Skip to comments.
South Carolina maybe the first state to exempt its citizens from Obamacare
Examiner ^
| 12/09/13
Posted on 12/10/2013 2:17:21 AM PST by Libloather
South Carolina legislators are looking to eliminate Obamacare in their state under State House bill H 3101, the Daily Caller reported on Monday.
The bill is titled the South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act, and was passed the state House of Representatives last April by a 65-34 vote.
The Daily Caller reported that the bill now heads to the South Carolina State Senate that is controlled by Republicans, is setting up the likelihood that South Carolina will become the first state to exempt citizens and businesses from all participation in the Affordable Care Act.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0bamacrapola; examinerblog; exempt; obamacare; sccarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
If it's good enough for Dingy Harry...
To: Libloather
Even a few of the more populous states doing this would be enough to rip the guts out of the ACA system.
2
posted on
12/10/2013 2:21:25 AM PST
by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
To: Libloather
3
posted on
12/10/2013 2:23:12 AM PST
by
QwertyKPH
(I didn't do it, nobody saw me do it, you can't prove anything!)
To: Libloather
Interesting historical comparison with South Carolina being the start.
4
posted on
12/10/2013 2:28:55 AM PST
by
McGruff
(Obama lied. Period!)
To: Little Pig
Even a few of the more populous states doing this would be enough to rip the guts out of the ACA system.With so few of the "youth" demographic signing up and so many of the enrollees being shifted to medicad (90%)I think that has already happened, and now we are just waiting for it to bleed out.
5
posted on
12/10/2013 2:41:01 AM PST
by
verga
(The devil is in the details)
To: McGruff
Interesting historical comparison with South Carolina being the start. I see what your getting at.
6
posted on
12/10/2013 2:41:42 AM PST
by
verga
(The devil is in the details)
To: Libloather
States Rights vs centralized govt. Awesome!
7
posted on
12/10/2013 2:43:33 AM PST
by
gattaca
("If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything." Mark Twain)
To: gattaca
Tyrants in Black Robes will have something to say about this. No question why Dingy Harry pulled the nuclear option and is setting up votes for Marxist Judges for the Appellant.
8
posted on
12/10/2013 2:55:14 AM PST
by
DAC21
To: McGruff
9
posted on
12/10/2013 3:38:15 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: DAC21
Interestingly, we're probably getting to the point where Dingy Harry and judges in black robes are less relevant in these matters than ever.
If you look at this move by the South Carolina legislature as a way to make the state more attractive for a manufacturing giant like Boeing, for example, you get a very different perspective.
You may not know this, but FedEx pretty much single-handedly destroyed the Federal "card check" unionization law that was one of the key priorities of the Obama administration back in 2009-10 when the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress. In that case it was a good thing, but I believe we passed the point long ago where major corporations like this have more influence in government than even our Senators and judges.
10
posted on
12/10/2013 3:42:12 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
To: gattaca
Won’t be long and the odumbo crowd will pass a law against all states rights. Nothing would surprise me that comes from that den of thieves.
11
posted on
12/10/2013 4:02:11 AM PST
by
DaveA37
To: Alberta's Child
FedEx pretty much single-handedly destroyed the Federal "card check" unionization law
Can you elaborate on that, please?
To: Progov
13
posted on
12/10/2013 4:08:03 AM PST
by
mazda77
To: mazda77
It all initially started in South Carolina. It may as well all start again in South Carolina. For the moment, soft revolution. Later on, who knows.
14
posted on
12/10/2013 4:22:22 AM PST
by
flaglady47
(When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
To: Libloather
Interesting, what will other states do?
15
posted on
12/10/2013 4:26:08 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine's brother
("When leftists donÂ’t get their way, they start shooting people and bombing buildings." - rr)
To: Libloather
Interesting, what will other states do?
16
posted on
12/10/2013 4:26:11 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine's brother
("When leftists donÂ’t get their way, they start shooting people and bombing buildings." - rr)
To: flaglady47
The whole thing will be soft and swift. To many, it will be over before they knew it started. Those will be the ones who will suffer their own willing disbelief. Sucks to be them, already, especially those with a public history like the MSM.
17
posted on
12/10/2013 4:37:08 AM PST
by
mazda77
To: QwertyKPH
And Linda Graham is actually allowing them to do that? I’m shocked...
To: Libloather
Another article about this
here.
19
posted on
12/10/2013 4:59:28 AM PST
by
upchuck
(I can't stand people that don't know the difference between 'than' and 'then.' Their so stupid...)
To: jsanders2001
Linda has nothing to do with it...he’s fed, this is all state controlled.
20
posted on
12/10/2013 5:01:19 AM PST
by
ThePatriotsFlag
(...and to the Republic for which it stood.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson