Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAME-SEX WEDDINGS 17 PERCENT OF WASHINGTON MARRIAGES
breitbart.com ^ | December 5, 2013 | DONNA GORDON BLANKINSHIP

Posted on 12/07/2013 7:19:07 AM PST by ilovesarah2012

Gay weddings made up 17 percent of marriages in Washington this past year, the first year gay marriages were legal in the state, state officials reported Wednesday.

About 7,071 same-sex couples got married in Washington between December 6, 2012, and the most recent complete month of data, September 2013. There were 42,408 total marriages in the state during that time, according to the Washington State Department of Health.

So far, most of Washington state's same-sex marriages, 62 percent, were between two women.

Washington is one of 15 states plus the District of Columbia where gay marriage is legal, but few have the kind of detailed data Washington released this week, in part because gay marriage is so new in most places.

According to the 2010 Census, there were about 152,335 same-sex married couples and 440,989 same-sex unmarried couples in the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; sicksicksick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: highball

“California would have repealed Prop 8 had the courts not made that moot”

Yup, I’ve been saying that for years.

“Virginia will have a repeal on its ballot next year.”

Where did you see this?

Freegards


41 posted on 12/07/2013 4:07:32 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic

That’s what I said (or meant to say, at any rate).

Gay marriage was prohibited by law in Minnesota. The voters had a chance to make that ban far stronger, but voted not to, and then the ban was repealed because they hadn’t.

Not exactly the same as a direct repeal of a constitutional amendment, as I said, but the closest I could think of.


42 posted on 12/07/2013 5:17:18 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic; stubernx98

It’s the left that wants to claim homosexuality is not a choice but a genetic inheritance. That’s absolutely false and there’s no evidence for it.

It’s difficult to find a clear scientific explanation of how sexual fetishes develop. But I believe whatever “causes” homosexuality are the same factors that cause any other kind of unnatural fetish.

Or it could be as simple as the fact that homosexuality is promoted, celebrated and portrayed in often pornographic ways throughout all our mass media. Simple marketing recruits more people into the lifestyle.


43 posted on 12/07/2013 5:27:00 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: knarf
God ?

You know what to do ...

Indeed He does, and He has a built-in way to do it, too.

Ever hear of the Cascadia Subduction Zone? Same kind of fault as the one that tore up Japan back in '11. Set that thing off and Seattle (and Portland, for that matter)....and a LOT of the surrounding area...gets destroyed.

44 posted on 12/07/2013 5:40:08 PM PST by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"They’re trying to get a proposal on the ballot here in Michigan to repeal the gay marriage ban we voted for 6 or 8 years ago."

The irony of this stuff is that most of the fervent supporters working on it aren't gay.

45 posted on 12/07/2013 5:50:25 PM PST by Baynative (Wake me up early, be good to my dogs and teach my children to pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

Gay marriage never used to be a political goal — I think it became a big priority because of death by AIDS, the supposed benefit to be the formalization of the legal relationship in order to prevent the massive promiscuity among gay men. I mean, we’ve all heard how perfectly that works with heterosexual relationships. ;’)


46 posted on 12/08/2013 3:53:38 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

My mistake - that’s what I get for not looking for a link.

I misremembered - Virginia’s repeal has been introduced in the legislature, but has a long way to go before it hits the ballot.

Still, only a matter of time. If we cling to “none of them have ever been repealed” the way we did “no electorate has ever voted for gay marriage” we’ll be caught as flat-footed as we were then. We need to strategize ahead, as our opponents do.


47 posted on 12/08/2013 5:29:26 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Are you aware of the twin studies(Identical twins)? Pretty much determines that who you are is based upon how your mom and Dad's DNA combined. You know, wheether your tale or short, smart or dumb etc. Based upon my research my estimate is that Genes determines who you are 70%, and culture 30%. Another factor that impacts things is the use of alcohol and drugs by the parents.
48 posted on 12/08/2013 2:05:38 PM PST by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98

doubtful


49 posted on 12/08/2013 2:06:52 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98

Your sexual fetish and behavior is not determined by DNA in any way shape or form.

I stumbled across some show once, accidently, and watched a host of a TV show berate and badger a man trying to TELL him he had to be gay because his twin brother was.

It was disgusting.


50 posted on 12/08/2013 2:08:22 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98

Googling around there don’t seem to be too many studies of homosexuality in twins. One seems to have found a roughly 50% matching rate among twins who were raised together. The methodology in that study seems to have been questioned a lot. But 50% in twins raised together seems to show there isn’t a strong genetic cause, since physically these are identical twins. And unless the twins were separated, we can’t know if they were exposed to an environment that led them both into this lifestyle. Certainly if your twin sibling starts doing something of his own accord, you might be inclined to imitate him, whether it be drinking, drugs or this.


51 posted on 12/08/2013 9:16:02 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

The twin studies I am refering to were of twins seperated at birth.


52 posted on 12/08/2013 9:20:21 PM PST by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson