Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Which Came First--the Spear or its Thrower? (article)
Institute for Creation Research ^ | Dec. 6, 2013 | Brian Thomas

Posted on 12/06/2013 11:23:06 AM PST by fishtank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2013 11:23:06 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Figure 2. A sample of Gademotta pointed artifacts exhibiting micro- and macrofracture features indicative of projectile weaponry. show more (A, B) fracture wings on transverse fractures; (C, D) fracture wings on burin-like fractures; (E) impact fractures on two fracture fronts on the distal portion. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078092.g002

Earliest Stone-Tipped Projectiles from the Ethiopian Rift Date to >279,000 Years Ago Yonatan SahleW. Karl HutchingsDavid R. BraunJudith C. SealyLeah E. MorganAgazi Ne..........

2 posted on 12/06/2013 11:24:44 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Which Came First--the Spear or its Thrower?

What a joke! If there are no spear throwers, then there are no spears - DOH!

3 posted on 12/06/2013 11:25:29 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

They really mean javelins here. A spear is a thrusting, not a throwing, weapon.


4 posted on 12/06/2013 11:26:10 AM PST by Doctor 2Brains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I think the Spearchucker came 1st.


5 posted on 12/06/2013 11:26:23 AM PST by Autonomous User (Pain Fades. Chicks Dig Scars. Glory, lasts forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Autonomous User
Which Came First--the Spear or its Thrower?

That be hard to choose, Andy.

6 posted on 12/06/2013 11:28:09 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Ancestors of Spearchucker Jones


7 posted on 12/06/2013 11:28:42 AM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

This is a veiled racist article, clearly implying spearchuckers.

And it’s Bush’s fault too,

QED


8 posted on 12/06/2013 11:29:12 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like you constitution, you can keep it. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Apes don't throw spears, and this kind of elegant throwing—the same basic action as pitching a baseball—requires a distinctly human anatomy...

Bad news... sounds like the palees have skipped development of a nuclear weapon, and gone for the time machine instead. They must have gone back and instantiated some 280,000 year old Intafadahs that we are just now learning about.

9 posted on 12/06/2013 11:29:34 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Beautiful stone.


10 posted on 12/06/2013 11:29:54 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains

280,000 years ago?!! and from the looks of it they have barely advanced beyond that stage (just about the same over all Africa for that matter other than what inventions European settlers brought there)...


11 posted on 12/06/2013 11:31:15 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Scientists age-dated a cache of stone-tipped throwing spears unearthed from Ethiopia's Gademotta Formation at 280,000 years old.

No hominid ever had an atlatl, ever. The atlatl was the planet's first super weapon and it was the thing which allowed Cro Magnon man to eliminate Neanderthals and other hominids from the planet, and Cro Magnon does not date from further back than around 45,000 years ago.

Apes and hominids did not have the kinds of shoulders you'd want for throwing things or using something like an atlatl. The dating scheme these guys are using is FUBAR.

The relationship between Cro Magnon Man and the people of Genesis...

12 posted on 12/06/2013 11:31:16 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Maybe the carbon dating system is only accurate to a certain point like say a few thousand years...


13 posted on 12/06/2013 11:33:23 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I thought the article was referring to the spear thrower—but what good is a thrower without a spear? The 80,000 year discrepancy seems sort of trivial to me, anyway. There are no written records of course, so new discoveries are bound to upset older theories.


14 posted on 12/06/2013 11:33:27 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Apes don't throw spears, and this kind of elegant throwing—the same basic action as pitching a baseball—requires a distinctly human anatomy.

Apes & monkeys throw poo

15 posted on 12/06/2013 11:34:58 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
evolutionary dogma's 200,000-year mark of man's supposed emergence.

Do you suppose the author misunderstands the concept of "dogma" or just chooses to misuse it?

And this material is peddled as science? How about that?

16 posted on 12/06/2013 11:35:02 AM PST by Dysart (Obamacare: "We are losing money on every subscriber-- but we will make it up in volume!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

Those dates you keep using...

17 posted on 12/06/2013 11:37:03 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

Do you suppose the author misunderstands the concept of “dogma” or just chooses to misuse it?

And this material is peddled as science? How about that?


Dogma: a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.

Well if it can’t be questioned... ;)


18 posted on 12/06/2013 11:40:25 AM PST by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

http://youtu.be/jDKvWiToj8Y


19 posted on 12/06/2013 11:41:15 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Autonomous User

I think his father came first.


20 posted on 12/06/2013 11:44:39 AM PST by clintonh8r (Don't twerk me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson