Posted on 12/03/2013 10:46:59 AM PST by Kaslin
Fast food workers are planning a strike to force employers to pay them $15 per hour. This Thursday, in over 100 cities across the nation, Big Labor is coordinating with "grassroots" activists to pressure these employers to pay a "living wage." From all the press, you'd think the push toward higher wages was something noble. But, this is Big Labor. And no one will bully, threaten or intimidate to steal your hard earned money more than Big Labor.
The group Fast Food Forward, one of the organizations in sync with Big Labor to shame fast food restaurants into extinction, states their purpose:
In America, people who work hard should be able to afford basic necessities like groceries, rent, childcare and transportation.While fast food corporations reap the benefits of record profits, workers are barely getting by — many are forced to be on public assistance despite having a job.
Raising pay for fast food workers will benefit workers and strengthen the overall economy.
It's not the workers that Big Labor wants to benefit. It's Big Labor that Big Labor wants to benefit.
The idea of a living wage is a fantasy. It's a myth. Like the Chupacabra, or a working Healthcare.gov website or that Lindsay Lohan is an actress. It's based on an idea that a certain amount of money, per hour, will make everything better. In this case, the elitists decided on $15 per hour.
Why? How is $15 per hour before taxes a living wage? Based on what? How much the elitists and Big Labor think you should earn? Why not $20 and hour? $50? Do I hear $100?
It's at this moment the Progessives and power merchants say things like, "Oh, come on!" and "Get serious, will you?" But I'm as serious as they are. (Actually, they're not serious. They're dangerous, but they're not serious.)
A living wage can't be quantified. It's based on the person and the needs/wants/desires of the person. The healthy person requires less money than the person with specific health conditions. The person who lives in Los Angeles needs more for rent than the person who lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The mother who has two children needs more than the single person.
Or, I could be totally wrong! The healthy person might live in Los Angeles while this sick person lives in Tulsa. The mother of two may be a better money manager that that single person, who uses their spare cash to buy drinks at local bars. It's not out of the realm of possiblity. It's not like some who were driven from New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina used their FEMA payments to pay for lap dances, right? Personal responsibility plays a huge part in the amount of money people need to "live."
There is no way to determine a living wage anywhere in America. It's a lie, and so is the idea that groups like Fast Food Forward and Big Labor care about fast food employees. Listen up, fast food workers, because you're being used! Not by McDonald's or Wendy's or Chick-Fil-A, but by Big Labor and the political candidates (ideology) they support. BIg Labor wants you to unionize because Big Labor wants you to pay union dues.
They want your money, and they don't give a good holy damn about you!
No one, anywhere, deserves more money at the expense of someone else. People can earn more money, and they should follow whatever path is necessary if earning more money is their motivation. Use jobs like these to learn the skills necessary to find other employment. Use jobs like these to work your way up the corporate ladder. Or, find another job. (Difficult, I know, in the Barack Obama economy; The same economy that has some people working these jobs because there are no other jobs. A difficult Catch-22 that a good 2014 election might actually fix!)
But don't expect fast food restaurants to give in to Big Labor's mythical demand of $15 per hour. And never think that striking for it is noble. You're not striking for your rights. You're participating in a shakedown.
For the rest of us, Thursday is a good day to treat yourself to some fast food. Fill the drive-thrus. And be patient. Some fools will actually strike, and things may run a little slower than normal. For those who don't strike, and don't give in to Big Labor's bullying tactics, say thank you. And, if you can, offer them a job. Because they're the one who understand hard work, and are working to create their opportunities.
Union numbers in the private sector have declined to nearly trivial numbers.
In the Baraqqi economy, all the new jobs are min wage/part time.
So even if the unions can only tap them for numbers like 10 bucks a month, it could still be a lot of dough for Democrats.
My dollars go to the chain that doesn’t fold to labor demands.
IMO they will eventually get what they want, because you can’t counter-argue any of those points with the bulk of the public.
The way you counter those points is when you advertise Big Macs will have to go up to $10 a piece!
I don’t begrudge anyone doing whatever they can, legally, to get a better wage.
Probably won’t be much of a picket line outside of Chick Fil A.
Many union contracts specify wages as a multiple of the minimum wage, which means that if the minimum wage increases 50%, some union members get 50% pay increases.
If people cannot earn enough to support themselves, minimum wage laws will likely do more harm than good. A business is not a charity. Charity should be a private matter, but if the government is to intervene it could provide supplementary income (what Milton Friedman called a negative income tax). The current welfare system that rewards sloth, family break up and dishonesty is transcendentally dysfunctional.
There’s another aspect of this as well - the payroll tax.
Increasing the min wage increases the payroll tax,
at least when forecast statically.
And just what will fast food workers get if they are unionized? A marginally better health care plan, 0-care notwithstanding? An extra bathroom break? More difficult for mgmt. to fire those who truly deserve it? And maybe, after intense negotiations a dollar or two/hour wage increase, that’ll be more than cancelled out by mandatory union dues, which aren’t even tax deductible. Be careful what you wish for. Well I’ll be thinking of fast food forward on Thursday, I’ll be at the local Hardees for our weekly cruise night.
If it took $15 an hour to retain qualified workers in the fast food business, then the fast food business would necessarily have to pay $15 an hour.
Evdidently that’s not the case and wishing it to be so doesn’t make it so.
You don't have to out argue them. The bulk of the public may agree but will still eat at whatever fast food has the cheapest prices with the food they like best. Big labor can't use these tactics to shut down fast food and with the current House in Washington they won't get it done legislately either.
They are fools.
Automation can easily do every part of fast food service except for verbal order taking, and kiosk ordering can replace that. Once people learn to use kiosks, and robots become politically correct, it will spread like wildfire.
I’d give it a year, after these workers get their $15.
No thanks—I prefer that the food I eat not be contaminated by a thug wannabe with an attitude.
No kidding. Hawking one up for Trayvon.
I kind of like sausage-egg mcmuffins
I bet the SEIU is paying the picketers less than they are demanding that workers be paid.
they get $50
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.