McConnell claims he will restore the historic filibuster
rule when he becomes Majority Leader.
this obviating @$h@t working for pResident 0'BlahBlah & his ilk.
Posted on 11/24/2013 4:41:57 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
November 24th, 2013
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Ben Cardin, D-Md.; former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Pre-empted by coverage of Formula One auto racing.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Reps. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.; former Secret Service agent Clint Hill.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and Tim Kaine, D-Va.; Facebook President and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., and Eliot Engel, D-N.Y.; Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis.
Awright Larri...
We’ll see yer hunnert and raise ya up another hunnert.
I doubt the slave owner he made an example of all slave owners even existed. He could have used George Washington as an example who offered the slaves their freedom due to overpopulating his plantation and they refused.
Over 75% of slaves never accepted their freedom at the end of the Civil War due to they lived in better conditions than most free men. Where was those examples of slavery?
Like all Marxists, he has to abuse his power to get her to shut up or at least not be taken seriously for fear of Americans hearing the truth.
Pray America is Waking
Well here’s the thing. It IS a bad deal.
In fact it’s more a lessening of sanctions for no evident reason than any kind of deal. I’ve no doubt money changed hands somewhere.
I just don’t think America understand any of this and until we do....and I include myself in that....just repeating something will eventually cause glazed eyes.
WHY is it a bad deal? What did the Iranians get? I learned that Iran has a new president....well Netanyahu got that out but until now, I didn’t know that.
I want to know WHY it’s a bad deal and I have yet to hear a pundit or a pub try to explain this to the American people.
Just a general complaint. If anyone out there in yon readership can give me more explanation, I’d appreciate it.
Of course, he will give you the old cliche of the Banking industry offering “preditory” loans. You can ask him why Fanny and Freddie dictated they offer those loans to unqualified home buyers.
Ask him why he trusts DC more than he does the banking industry who have been giving loans for thousands of years. Then ask him if why he trusts them more on banking then he does with Obamacare? It is the same corrupt gummit dictating the industries they hate and hurting Americans in the end.
You will never get an answer since he is a member of the cult.
Well...plus "The Fed" and the Boston Fed, issuing edicts directly to banks, saying as much.
A couple of additional names...Major players..."Einsteins" Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke.
I don't think expansion is the issue. I believe there are 3 openings currently. If this is true, it is Obama's intention to fill those 3 and tilt the court left.
Liberals in DC pressured the banks to issue subprimes (mostly minority loans).
Think about it...would the banks really have WANTED to issue loans to people who didn't have the money to pay them back? They were threatened by liberals with lawsuits, denial of mergers, etc. if they didn't issue junk loans.
Then when it all crashed the liberals turned around and blamed the banks...but instead of saying how wonderful it was to issue loans to minorities, now they called it "predatory lending" and thus the banks alone were blamed for issuing loans they didn't want to issue in the first place.
"Republicans argue that the D.C. Circuit doesn’t need any more judges. The current court has eight sitting judges divided evenly between Democratic and Republican appointees. There are also six senior judges, including five GOP appointees, who help decide some cases.
I’m watching Sarah right now she’s awesome!! Blew wall-ass right out of the water. No matter where he went she kicked his ass.
Obama simply wants to take Obamacare off of the front page.
He will even go as far as make a fake deal with Iran!
This is desperation!
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2013/1121/How-new-Senate-filibuster-rule-could-change-balance-of-power-on-courts-video
Every time she gets on TV she is better and better and better.
Christ is the foundation of Christmas,doesn't get any better than Sarah Palin.
I can't see Britt Hume bringing out details like that. He's above all that. Obviously, Wall ass is not.
I guarantee you if it were Hillary of the fat mooch there would have been no details by wall ass--he's a typical chickenshi__ wannabe excuse for a urinalist.
Saying what everyone else is afraid to say. Surprised that wallace repeated the dem claim that obamacare would insure 30 million people...blah, blah...
That bothered me too and really grossed out my wife, so it got me thinking. I don't know if I'm on the right track, but here is a possibility. Martin Bashir is British, but of Pakistani Christian origin. Could there be some real symbolism going on here, related to the Arab customs in the Middle East?
Refer to the Biblical text of 2 Kings 18, the bullying threats by the emissary of Sennicherib, King of Assyria (modern day Syria) against King Hezikaiah and the Hebrew people, specifically...
27 But the Rabshakeh said to them, “Has my master sent me to your master and to you to speak these words, and not to the men who sit on the wall, who will eat and drink their own waste with you?” - II Kings, 26-27"26 Then Eliakim... said to the Rabshakeh (Assyrian Commander), “Please speak to your servants in Aramaic, for we understand it; and do not speak to us in Hebrew in the hearing of the people who are on the wall.”
Apparently it was the custom of the Arabs of the day to make conquered peoples eat their own waste as a part of the humiliation of being conquered. So, this sort of treatment of the vanquished has a long history in the Middle East.
Was Bashir really threatening and symbolizing more (and in a Middle Eastern way) than he appeared to be saying? Or am I reading too much into this and he simply a crass, lying, Liberal bully who just likes to intimidate women in the worst way and knows he can get away with this on MSDNC?
Either way it's bad and inexcusable in a civilized society.
The timing of Iran is in part all about zero and Hillary's falling numbers. Neither one can afford that to happen. Val/jar has been secretly meeting with her counterparts/fellow Iranians in the Shia led country and figured out how to let them have what they want.All the while pretending to care about what is good for the U.S something they are experts at except when it all goes wrong like in Benghazi.
We will all be naive to think that after Iran peaks there won't be something else like... say.... amnesty which Boehner has already said he will take up.
Looks like my worst fears may be realized if we are not careful. If we work hard enough we may just snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory in 2014 once again.
When 90-150 million stand to lose their current coverage which is undoubtedly far better than what they are getting under zero care they brag about insuring 30 million. Borders on insanity.
And it would be if it were not for the fact that they will probably get away with the statement unless someone from the New Media counters it.(which we will)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.