When 90-150 million stand to lose their current coverage which is undoubtedly far better than what they are getting under zero care they brag about insuring 30 million. Borders on insanity.
And it would be if it were not for the fact that they will probably get away with the statement unless someone from the New Media counters it.(which we will)
Absolutely right about media covering or not covering. Like a tree falling in the forest.
Same way with employment numbers. Every month they brag about “O created” 80,000 (pick a number) jobs last month. But they never tell us how many jobs were LOST, how many able-bodied people of working age dropped out of the labor force entirely, how many went on permanent SS disabiliity, etc. In other words, what is a reasonable NET number?
And do they count part-time jobs the same as full-time jobs (if there are any)? Do those people cut to 29 hours earn the same pay they did at 40? (Probably not - but they still are expected to perform the same amount of work)
Everything has been a total deception.