Posted on 11/13/2013 7:04:46 PM PST by markomalley
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must disclose its plans for a so-called Internet kill switch, a federal court ruled on Tuesday.
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the agencys arguments that its protocols surrounding an Internet kill switch were exempt from public disclosure and ordered the agency to release the records in 30 days. However, the court left the door open for the agency to appeal the ruling.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is seeking Standard Operating Procedure 303, also known as the Internet kill switch from Homeland Security. The protocols govern shutting down wireless networks to prevent the remote detonation of bombs.
The broad government power to shut down communications networks worries civil libertarians. However, the agency argues the protocols must be kept secret to protect national interests and the safety of individuals.
EPIC filed a FOIA request for the protocols in July 2012. The Department of Homeland Security originally said it could not find any records on the kill switch.
After EPIC appealed, the agency located the protocol, but redacted nearly all of the information. The agency cited exemptions that allow the withholding of information that could disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions or could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual.
The court said Homeland Security wrongly claimed that it could withhold Standard Operating Procedure 303 as a technique for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions.
The court also found that interpreting a safety exemption to encompass possible harm to anyone anywhere in the United States within the blast radius of a hypothetical unexploded bomb also flies in the face of repeated Supreme Court direction to read FOIA exemptions narrowly.
While the court rejected the agencys broad interpretation of FOIA exemptions, it left the door open for further appeals by Homeland Security. The agency has 30 days to release the protocols to EPIC, but the court issued a 30-day additional stay on its opinion to allow the agency time to appeal.
what they really want to do is keep us from communicating with each other when they start thier ball rolling
.
Women WILL talk. Faster than the speed of light.
And there aren't enough of 'they' to stop all of us, since us is the folks that make things happen anyway.
When is the last time you saw a federal agent microcode on bare metal? Or plug something into a wall socket, even?
They aren't all that. Basic math and logistics keeps one's feet on the ground.
/johnny
Public discourse is in a much larger arena now. Orders of magnitude. 10x12 kind of magnitude.
/johnny
10^12. Idjit.
Gore’s fault.
Ethernet — not originally wired.
>>Dear God... 300 baud acousic coupled on a rotary dial POTS. I’ve done that. On a pay phone with a genset running in the trunk of a Lincoln Mark IV and a VT-100 in the back seat.<<
Beat the hell out of driving into the office to hotfix a C04 error.
The problem was that we went from the ABILITY to remote access to the REQUIREMENT we do so.
If you recall the ill-fated Vanguard missile program, it was compared to the bureaucrats who implemented it: ‘You can’t fire it and you can’t make it work.’
bump
LOL
...ham...
Exactly. Has there ever been an instance where a bomb was designed to be activated through the internet ? Seems to me it would be unreliable and much harder to set up than just using a cellphone.
And at the time it was just the coolest thing...
If they shut down the internet how will DHS know what’s going on in all those Tea Party terrorist meeting?
For that matter, how will Obama know anything? Shutting down the internet is going to kill the new services.
So sorry, Internet must not have been plugged in!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.