Posted on 11/11/2013 9:04:33 AM PST by SJackson
- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -
Why Did So Many Wanted Nazis Convert To Islam?
Posted By Giulio Meotti On November 11, 2013 @ 12:30 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 5 Comments
Reprinted from IsraelNationalNews.com.
There are Nazi grafts in Arab-Islamic terrorism.
At the top of the most wanted list of the Simon Wiesenthal Center there is a man who today would be one hundred years old. His name is Alois Brunner and he is responsible for the deaths of over 130,000 Jews. The Nazi hunters still place him in Syria, where he was last seen in 2001, protected by the regime of Bashar al-Assad.
Brunner was one of the most zealous ideologues and officials of the “Final Solution,” the plan for the extermination of the Jews. The idea haunted him to the point that in 1985 he said to the German magazine Bunte: “I regret that I didn’t finish the job.”
When the United Arab Republic of Syria was formed, Dr. Brunner took up residence at 7 George Haddad, in the embassy district of Damascus. In 1961, the year that Adolf Eichmann was captured by the Israelis in Buenos Aires, Brunner received a bomb-letter, probably from the Mossad and lost an eye.
Brunner, a personal friend of Hafez el Assad, took part in the construction of Syria’s secret services on the model of the Gestapo.
In November 1967, the neo-Nazi organization Bund Heimattreuer Jugend published in Esslingen Hegensberg, West Germany, the obituary of Karl van Kynast: “Lieutenant (res.) of the Bundeswehr, Captain in the army of the United Arab Republic, he felt at the Suez Canal on 12 September, 1967”.
Brunner is, in fact, only the best known of a number of Nazi officials who participated in the construction of of the Islamic regimes and who died in those lands after converting to Islam.
This alliance between the Nazi swastika and the Islamic Koran is well explained in a 1942 article written by Johann von Leers, the best known of Nazi converts to Islam. Published in the newspaper “Die Judenfrage”, the article presented Judaism and Islam in terms of Hegel’s thesis and antithesis: “The hostility of Muhammad towards the Jews had a consequence: the Oriental Jews were totally paralyzed. If the rest of the world had adopted a similar policy, we would not have the ‘Jewish question’. Islam has made an eternal service to the world by preventing the conquest of Arabia by the Jews.”
One of the leaders of the “Jewish Affairs” in Galicia, Altern Erich, converted to Islam and took the name of “Ali Bella” in Egypt, where he trained Palestinian terrorists.
Leopold Gleim was known through his original name as a head of the Gestapo in Poland, but became “Ali al- Nahar” at the service of the Egyptian dictator Nasser.
Oskar Dirlewanger, after killing tens of thousands of Jews in the Ukraine, became the bodyguard of the Egyptian dictator. Dr. Heinrich Willerman, famous for some of the most atrocious experiments at Dachau, and directed the terrorist “Camp Samarra” in Egypt.
After having “liquidated” the Warsaw ghetto, Kurt Baurnann joined the Ministry of War in Cairo and trained the Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
The head of the Gestapo in Düsseldorf, Joachim Daemling, went to work at the Egyptian prison system.
Even François Genoud, the famous banker of Nazism, testamentary heir of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, used the war treasure of the Reich to finance the Arab- Muslim anti-Jewish causes, and in 1959, gave birth to “International Association of Friends of the Arab World”.
Walter Rauff, who invented the “gas vans” which killed at 97,000 Jews during the Holocaust, in 1948 tortured Jews in Damascus.
Boeckler Wilhelm became “Abd al Karim”, the SS Wilhelm Berner instructed Palestinian terrorists, the SS Gruppenführer Alois Moser became “Hassan Sulayman”.
In Cairo lived Hans Eisele, “Dr. Eisele”, who in Dachau became notorious for torturing prisoners with injections of cyanide. Even Otto Skorzeny, the SS commander who freed Mussolini from his prison on the Gran Sasso, lived in Cairo, where he perfected the Intelligence Services of Nasser’s regime.
Among the collaborators of Skorzeny there was also an official of the Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda, Franz Buensch, an “expert on the Jewish problem” who had worked with Adolf Eichmann on the “Final Solution” and had also written a book entitled “Sexual Habits of the Jews”, perhaps the most repugnant document produced by the Nazis.
In the Egyptian capital there was another infamous doctor, Aribert Heim, “Dr. Tod”, Dr. Death, so named because of the cruelty of his experiments in the camps of Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Mauthausen. Heim converted to Islam under the name of “Tarek Hussein Farid”. He sported an Islamic beard, he went to the al Azhar mosque every morning and read the Koran in the German translation.
The collaborator of Goebbels, Johann von Leers, was solemnly received in Cairo by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al Husseini: “We thank you for having fought against the powers of darkness incarnated by world Jewry”. After converting to Islam, Von Leers assumed the name of “Omar Amin von Leers” and in Cairo occupied many posts in the administration of Nasser.
When Tom Cruise in 2008 produced the movie “Valkyrie”, Major Otto Ernst Remer, who in the film has the face of Thomas Kretschmann, was portrayed as a key figure in the bloody suppression of the conspiracy that tried to assassinate Adolf Hitler. In 1993, an Egyptian newspaper interviewed Remer, who hailed the Khomeini revolution, said that the gas chambers were “lies” and who compared the defeat of Nazi Germany to that of the Palestinian Arabs, “both victims of the Jews, both suffered under occupation”.
And how to forget that neo-Nazis helped Yasser Arafat in 1972′s Munich massacre?
This is not an exotic, distant story, it sheds a dramatic light on the existential war between political Islam and the Jews.
While reading these and other stories of Nazi officials who fought for Islam, I am reminded of the project of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haji Amin al Hussein, who planned to install a gas chamber and a crematorium near Nablus/Shechem. That is the real “occupation,” that of a genocidal and totalitarian ideology at war with the Jews in their own land.
A Birkenau in the desert. A Mauthausen which would have liked to set foot on Mount Zion.
You bet. And they still refer to Hitler as “right wing”...
Is this a trick question?
On that last, see the Hayek quote on my profile page. It’s the third one, two paragraphs.
Quit battering the title.
Just so. Mussolini was a member of the Communist Party before he became a Fascist and one of Hitler’s models.
“..And they still refer to Hitler as “right wing”......”
Of course they do. They count on people being ignorant and not doing some basic research. And young boneheaded college kids, after having been taught revisionist history for 12 years prior to college, have zero clue - because basically, they don’t give a sh*t about it. They care about getting laid, getting stoned, and getting out of college with a degree that’ll start them at 80K a year somewhere.
Adolf was diehard socialist through and through.
Socialist is even in name, NAZI!! National Socialist German Workers’ (<...left wing code word) Party. Examine the history of the the party and of the Italian Fascists. Clearly from the left, both of them. Hitler may of been in the right wing OF the Nazi party, as there were others more devoted to left wing economics while he was focused on killing people and conquering the world.
It’s not the same thing as communism but it’s clearly and explicitly anti-capitalist and very similar to the “third way” polices of today’s corporate democrats and euro-socialists.
They’ll tell you his “authoritarianism” is what makes him “right wing” rather than economics, I guess Stalin is “right wing” as well then. Aside from a few slight differences and different mustaches they are the same damn guy.
Muslims specialize in hypocrisy.
Mohammed Atta and friends were downing vodka in strip clubs in the weeks prior to 9/11.
A very interesting question to ponder.
“..It’s not the same thing as communism but it’s clearly and explicitly anti-capitalist and very similar to the “third way” polices of today’s corporate democrats and euro-socialists....”
Socialism is a stage on the road to communism. Always has been, always will be.
It’s not a stopping point; it’s a stepping stone.
The National Socialist German Worker's party began as an non-Marxist socialist movement, combining left-wing economics with right-wing nationalism (in contrast to Marxist socialism which was internationalist).
When Hitler came to power, he needed the support of bankers, industrialists, as well as the Prussian aristocracy / army officer classes, so he purged the economic socialists from his party (Roehm, Strasser, etc) and cemented its identity as a right-wing movement.
“They count on people being ignorant and not doing some basic research.”
You bet.
“Aside from a few slight differences and different mustaches they are the same damn guy.”
Amen. I refer to them as “both sides of the same coin”.
Like I said I wouldn’t say fascism is the same thing as or a stop on the way to communism but it is not capitalist, it’s a kind of socialism. AFAIK any kind of economic oppression = left wing, period. Other issues, irrelevant, left-right is economic. Fascism uses corporations as tools of the government rather than abolishing them or nationalizing them like communism. Obamacare is very fascist.
Given that the “socialism in one country” philosophy is what won out in the Soviet Union I wouldn’t say they were anti-nationalist either, Trotsky was the internationalist, he got capped . So all in all precious little difference between Hitler and Stalin, silly to call one left and the other right.
Completely understand.
The left-right paradigm is what the libs use to distract, obfuscate, and draw attention away from what they’re actually doing - iow, all the things they accuse others of, they themselves are actually perpetrating.
“...Aside from a few slight differences and different mustaches they are the same damn guy....”
And the hair. Uncle Joe had that whole Brylcream “A Little Dab’l Do Ya” thing going on, with the hipster swoop and tuck action...
With hair like that he could.... rule the world....
I hear Mrs Stalin had an even BIGGER mustache under the babushka... But that’s just a Menshevik rumor....
Speaking of Mrs. Stalin, he possibly murdered wife #2.
Wife #1 died of typhus and he remarked at her funeral “This creature softened my heart of stone. She died and with her died my last warm feelings for humanity.”.
“So all in all precious little difference between Hitler and Stalin, silly to call one left and the other right.”
Exactly! But certain factors will always downplay that truth.
‘The left-right paradigm is what the libs use to distract, obfuscate, and draw attention away from what they’re actually doing - iow, all the things they accuse others of, they themselves are actually perpetrating.”
You bet; they specialize in “projecting”. And then they call their opponents out for the behaviors THEY undertake. When you have a complicit media, it works pretty well, huh?
“I hear Mrs Stalin had an even BIGGER mustache under the babushka... But that’s just a Menshevik rumor....”
No shaving down there I suspect.
“Speaking of Mrs. Stalin, he possibly murdered wife #2.”
I’d move that level of probability from “possibly” to “OJ”.
By this logic, mercantilism and absolute monarchy are "left wing" ideologies, which makes absolutely no sense. There are both left and rightwing alternatives to laissez-faire capitalism. In fact, during the French Revolution (where the terms Left and Right had their origin), the liberal Left advocated Anglo-American laissez-faire, the monarchist right wing advocated mercantilism.
Fascism and Nazism represent reactionary alternatives to capitalism and Republican government, Socialism and Communism are radical (left wing) alternatives to republican government and capitalism. Moreover, economics is secondary to fascist ideology - both Hitler and Mussolini were happy to support pro-business policies (busting labor unions) and pro-labor policies (wage and price controls) when convenient. Trying to frame these ideological differences in terms of the debates taking place today in the United States is foolish.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
