Skip to comments.
WSJ on how to spot fake Obamacare sites: If ‘website is usable’
Daily Caller ^
| November 11, 2013
| Vince Conglianese
Posted on 11/11/2013 8:35:51 AM PST by PJ-Comix
On Sunday, The Wall Street Journal gave its readers a helpful tip on how to avoid being scammed by fake Obamacare sites: avoid websites that actually work:
Important consumer warning: If an insurance shopping website is usable, its not the federal governments, the Journal quipped in an unsigned editorial.
HealthCare.gov the federal destination for Obamacare-compliant healthcare has been famously horrible since Obamacare officially kicked off on Oct. 1.
The Journal notes that there has been a profusion of identity thieves and scam-artist pages that are now pretending to be Healthcare.gov and are tricking people into divulging sensitive information or buying fake products.
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: fail; fake; farce; fraud; obamacare
LOL! FUnnie but TRUE!
1
posted on
11/11/2013 8:35:51 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix; sickoflibs; Liz
Important consumer warning: If an insurance shopping website is usable, its not the federal governments
2
posted on
11/11/2013 8:38:05 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Obama - "too arrogant to question his own bad judgement" ... Greenfield)
I can tell you if a website is unusable...if it has a .gov behind the name. /s?
3
posted on
11/11/2013 8:42:24 AM PST
by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11) Hey, Harry Reid.. 1-800-318-2596!)
To: PJ-Comix
Ha! If you get past the sign-in page, something should tell you it is a fake......ha ha.....
This fake, quasi-black, foreigner Muslim President is a frigging joke.
4
posted on
11/11/2013 8:44:22 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: PJ-Comix
scam-artist pages that are now pretending to be Healthcare.govAs opposed to the scam artists who really are Healthcare.gov.
5
posted on
11/11/2013 8:49:29 AM PST
by
MUDDOG
To: PJ-Comix
Semi-serious question here. Is HealthCare.gov supposed to also handle financial transactions; i.e., do you pay an initial premium through the site as well? Or, do these insurance companies bill you separately?
6
posted on
11/11/2013 8:49:55 AM PST
by
Lou L
(Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
To: GOPJ
I made this up as a joke back in October...
even funnier now that it’s true.
7
posted on
11/11/2013 8:51:30 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: PJ-Comix
Baraq is missing a huge opportunity.
He could follow up his lost jobs due to ATMs by hiring a half million clerks (the 2010 census had 635,000) to process Obamacare apps. Forget the computers, go with telephones and paper!
Employment stats would be great.
The media would be ecstatic over this double win!
8
posted on
11/11/2013 8:53:56 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(Baraq's 3rd term: squaw Warren? Lord help us!)
To: MrB
9
posted on
11/11/2013 9:16:14 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Obama - "too arrogant to question his own bad judgement" ... Greenfield)
To: Gaffer
Neither Obama nor Sibelius nor anyone in HHS could pour p*ss out of a boot with directions on the back. This disaster is either the end of the Democrat Party -I hope! - or the catalyst for a second revolution (still thinking about that...).
10
posted on
11/11/2013 10:16:14 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: PJ-Comix
"Sure, it looks sketchy. But it
might be legit."
11
posted on
11/11/2013 10:48:55 AM PST
by
Paine in the Neck
(Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson