Posted on 11/08/2013 6:55:19 AM PST by GonzoII
Last Tuesday, the Washington Times published an article by Joseph Cotto entitled, “Overpopulation: Should America have a one-child policy?” Despite the provocative title, the article does not present a stimulating thought-experiment, but rather a series of half-truths and inconsistencies with dangerous implications.
Because such half-truths have been at the ideological root of every forced abortion this century, we at Population Research Institute drew up a list of the claims made in the article—and countered them with facts to expose their fallacies.
Claim 1: Cotto commences his article by citing Michael Arth, a controversial gubernatorial candidate who advocated the imposition of birth credits. Arth argued that although human innovation often “increases under pressure,” the pressure which inspires it is worse than the innovation itself. The article cites, “One of the most innovative periods of human history was WWII…However, we also had the wholesale destruction of cities, untold suffering and the massacre of at least 60 million people.”
Reply: World War II was indeed a period of both ingenuity as well as suffering. However, Mr. Joseph Cotto confuses correlation with causation. Ingenuity and suffering are not inextricably related. There have been periods of misery without ingenuity, and periods of ingenuity without suffering. For instance, the Silicon Valley technology boom of the 1990s did not produce “misery and sorrow for the sake of innovation.”
Claim 2: “The human misery created by overpopulation is comparable to war and one of the main reasons for war. Nazi foreign policy, for example, was based on the need for ‘Lebensraum,’ living space that would support Germany’s growing population.”
Reply: Joseph Cotto again presents another half-truth. Yes, Hitler touted “overpopulation” as a justification for his aggressive and expansionist foreign policy. Germany was not actually overpopulated at the time, however, but Hitler used the spectre of overpopulation to provide a justification for his horrific human rights abuses and eugenic policies. Such has been the historical use of the myth of overpopulation: from China’s forced abortions to the sterilization of Ethiopian immigrants in Israel, it has been wielded as a weapon of control.
Claim 3: “We are far exceeding the carrying capacity of the planet.”
Reply: The world currently produces enough food to feed 10 billion people, and there are only 7 billion of people. That is, with 7 billion human minds at work, we produce enough food for 10 billion human bodies. Imagine how much food we could produce with 10 billion minds! According to the World Education Service, “World agriculture produces 17% more calories per person today than it did 30 years ago.. . . This is enough to provide everyone in the world with at least 2,720 kilocalories (kcal) per person per day.”
Claim 4: “The U.S. population grew by 22.5% from 1990-2010. That is the highest growth rate in the industrialized world. By comparison. . . Japan only grew by 4.7% in the same period.”
Reply: Yes, the U.S. population grew at a rate of about 1% per year during the twenty year period between 1990 and 2010. However, the U.S. does not have the highest growth rate in the industrialized world. Australia, Albania, Greenland, Iceland, Ireland, and New Zealand all have higher rates of natural population increase (growth without immigration or emigration). Quick! Impose a one-child policy. . . Iceland is about to be over-populated!
A further word about Japan: Japan has had below-replacement fertility since 1955, and now that their larger, higher fertility generations are dying from old age, Japan is shrinking. Japan has had negative growth rate since 2009, and their population is already shrinking by over 100,000 people per year. As the Japanese population continues to age, they will shrink faster and faster each year. Academics at Tohoku University have created a clock counting down to the day when Japan will have one only child: Japan is not a model for demographic health.
Claim 5: “The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of American women has been at or below the replacement level (2.1) for 4 decades. This means that if the net immigration were zero, or even below a few hundred annually, the US population would stop growing in a matter of decades. What keeps our population growing very rapidly and unsustainably is net immigration.”
Reply: Mr. Joseph Cotto is correct on this point. American fertility has been at or below replacement level since 1970, and without immigration, the US population would soon shrink. Immigration has accounted for anywhere from one-half to one-quarter of American population growth for decades, and this doesn’t even account for the higher fertility of immigrants. In addition to bolstering the U.S. population, first-generation immigrants have higher fertility rates than natural-born citizens.
CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!
If Mr. Cotto were really concerned with the “overpopulation” of the U.S., then arguing for stringent anti-immigration laws would be a simpler solution than his proposed “birth license plan.” In fact, Joseph Cotto quotes the executive director of Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) in his article as “the foremost group addressing overpopulation,” who, without debate, are passionately anti-immigration. According to the CAPS website, the U.S. should stop immigration by “saying ‘NO’ to amnesties” and “end ‘birthright citizenship.’”
We at PRI do not argue for expelling those with higher fertility, denying entrance to those who need amnesty, nor for preventing the reproduction of those whom the government deems “unfit.”
Historically, such ideologies have been responsible for more atrocities than betterments. Nor is the historical scoreboard the mere result of badly implemented policies; any policy rooted in lies and distortions can never produce good fruit. We at PRI fight against coercive population control, because we believe in human dignity and ingenuity.
Holt-Giménez, Eric, et al. “We Already Grow Enough Food for 10 Billion People… and Still Can’t End Hunger.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36.6 (2012): 595-598.
LifeNews Note: Anne Morse writes for the Population Research Institute.
"Yes, Hitler touted “overpopulation”...Germany was not actually overpopulated at the time, however, but Hitler used the spectre of overpopulation to provide a justification for his horrific human rights abuses and eugenic policies. Such has been the historical use of the myth of overpopulation: from China’s forced abortions to the sterilization of Ethiopian immigrants in Israel, it has been wielded as a weapon of control."
The world elites have wanted this for a long time. Obamacare ushered in “Soylent Green”...
Notice how these population-reduction folks never lead by example.
Now who didn’t see this coming???
Immigration drives 75% of our population growth. We will add 110 million people over the next 40 years. The US can control its population growth thru limiting immigration, not the number of children someone can bear.
I so want to comment, but what’s in my mind to say would just get deleted.
Umm...how are they going to control the welfare bunch whose livelyhood depends on multiple babies from multiple baby daddies????
At the same time we’re letting in untold number of illegals?
I have a better idea, let’s put a complete anti American, economically ignorant, narcissist into the White House and accept that congress refuses to oppose him.
honestly, there’s a lot of Americans that shouldn’t be having one child let alone more than that.
But, but, that might be racist.
yeah, and we on FR know....well...those are the liberals future voters! Can’t lose them!
If liberals believe that then they should do it.
Yes, if we are to be concerned about population growth, then America should first try having a One-Crimigrant Policy. We’ll allow one illegal crimigrant to cross the Rio Grande per year.
Amazing to me to reflect that in 1780 there were 3 million Americans, mostly patriots. And today, we have 150-200 million dolts.
Well each father only has 1 baby! Maybe the Chinese women should do this since they abort all the girl fetuses.
OK but only for Welfare recipients.
Let me guess, Washington will pass some law and not read it first...like Obamacrap, I mean CARE....and then find out enforcing it means forced abortions like in China?
Good Lord have mercy. We are so freaking doomed if we don’t get a real AMERICAN in the oval office.
Overpopulation is the latest "emotional appeal" gimmick aimed at the "guilty white" privilege class. Why don't we use this argument against this idiot and ask him; If you are so concerned about overpopulation than why don't you advocate deporting illegals, it will reduce the population by at least 12 million.
The liberal morons can't have it both ways
Yeah, isn’t it amazing that your avg liberal will be critical of a family with 3+ kids that are supporting them themselves, but can’t bring themselves to say anything negative about a welfare broodmare that keeps having babies to stay on the dole.
Legal immigration has a far greater impact. We bring in 1.2 million legal immigrants a year. In 1970 one in 21 was foreign born in this country; today it is one in 8, the highest it has been in 90 years; and by 2050 it will be one in 5. We have close to 45 million foreign born in this country, which would, if it were a country, be the 32nd largest country in the world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.