Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unions exposed as war saboteurs
Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) ^ | 2nd November 2013 | Miranda Devine

Posted on 11/05/2013 12:16:44 PM PST by naturalman1975

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2013 12:16:44 PM PST by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Thanks for sharing this.


2 posted on 11/05/2013 12:31:45 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

American unions did their fair share of crap during the war, as well.


3 posted on 11/05/2013 12:36:31 PM PST by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Wow! That story makes me wonder what American unions did to subvert our country during the war.


4 posted on 11/05/2013 12:37:29 PM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Then there was this problem which soon spread around the world, even to New Zeeland and Australia.


5 posted on 11/05/2013 12:43:08 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

In his autobiographical book “Goodbye Darkness” William Manchester wrote that in August 1942 at Guadalcanal there were
some merchant marine ships carrying cargo for the Marines. The ships with union crew members bugged out and did not off load supplies for the Marines. the only food the marines had was rice captured from the Japanese. Manchester blamed the unions.


6 posted on 11/05/2013 12:44:34 PM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

How about the Longshoremen under the leadership of Harry Bridges who struck the docks on the West Coast, delaying shipments of arms and munitions to our troops in the Pacific. Bridges was a self-declared Communist.

I knew a Marine Captain who participated in several invasions. He told me that he and his men went into battle with just one round apiece. One round!

He told me that after the war he had a good mind to kill Harry Bridges. But as he was a good Christian, I think that was a momentary, idle threat.


7 posted on 11/05/2013 12:46:21 PM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Another problem I read about years ago was that quite a few service men were pro-Nazi. Instead of arresting them, the US Army put them in charge of security at US POW Camps.

After several escapes the problem was found to be in the political orientation of the guards, who looked the other way, and they were removed from duty.


8 posted on 11/05/2013 12:47:07 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Unions are Marxist in nature.


9 posted on 11/05/2013 12:49:38 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man

The truth is that the whole US Navy, supply ships and all men of war left, deserting the Marines and taking all their supplies.

Union sailors had nothing to do with it

” Shockingly, those who have never read the history of Guadalcanal will discover that with only a small portion of supplies and equipment ashore, the Navy, fearing Japanese bombardment and air attacks, abandoned the Marines and sailed away with much of the division’s food, ammunition, equipment and other supplies.” - See more at: http://www.mca-marines.org/leatherneck/bookreview/guadalcanal-us-marines-world-war-ii-pictorial-tribute#sthash.aZdw5QNM.dpuf


10 posted on 11/05/2013 12:54:32 PM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
 
 
Oh yes they did. Sabotage was a very tenacious problem in our defense industries from the 1930s and into the 40's. Communist and Nazi influences on bluecollar Americans played a huge part in that. After the Hitler/Stalin pact of 1939 the communists declared open season on our defense projects. Shipyards had to have heavy security to dampen down the mischief but even so all sorts of things would still happen - sand and metal grit in hydraulic lines, necessitating it all getting ripped out and replaced, scrap metal being tossed under gun turret mounts thus having to pull main turrets back out, replace the rollers and resurface/remachine the bearing area. Holes drilled where they should not have been any or no holes where some should have been - stuff like that. After Hitler attacked the Soviet Union there was a decent drop-off in incidents though there still were Nazi infiltrators and disgruntled workers to contend with.
 
 

11 posted on 11/05/2013 12:54:47 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Should have sent them to the Pacific theatre.

I had a number of relatives that came to the USA from Germany, France and Poland during the late 30s. They were immediately drafted at the start of the war — being native speakers, but Jewish -— because they were deemed anti-Nazi.

In fact, they have been visited by what-is-now selective service prior to Pearl Harbor, to make sure they were ready to go whent the time came.

Pretty logical, actually.


12 posted on 11/05/2013 12:56:37 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DeFault User

At least on the East Coast the US Government enlisted the Mafia to help keep the ports open.


13 posted on 11/05/2013 12:59:47 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

They did the same thing in the U.S. They were either Communist or just as likely part of the Mafia.

The government eventually was forced to make a deal with them. We basically looked the other way on their crimes and they did the work.


14 posted on 11/05/2013 1:01:53 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

Some of the communist unions sought to sabotage the war against Japan, so more effort would be be committed against the Nazis, who were at war with the Soviet Union.

We (the US) were never at war with the Nazis before the Nazis were at war with the Soviets.

The Soviets finally joined the war against Japan after Hiroshima bombing.


15 posted on 11/05/2013 1:04:42 PM PST by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar will soon be repeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
The Brits had similar problems during the war.

On a related note, one historian states that although the Soviets were as culpable as the Germans re the invasion of Poland, British politicians knew that any reprisals against the USSR were impossible. The Commie sympathizer unions would have shut Britain down.

16 posted on 11/05/2013 1:11:58 PM PST by jumpingcholla34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yeah, one of the coolest rebuttals on a military topic I’ve ever seen went like this:

“What can the Marines really do without the Navy?”

“Win on Guadalcanal.”


17 posted on 11/05/2013 1:12:40 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
 
 
Some of the communist unions sought to sabotage the war against Japan, so more effort would be be committed against the Nazis, who were at war with the Soviet Union.
 
I don't know about all that - the first I've heard of it. All I can do is relate the first-hand experiences of someone who guarded the Brooklyn Naval Yard and had to deal with the incidents there. They had Marines on-site in barracks, about 150 of them, who manned the entry ways, walked post and coordinated with Naval Intelligence, the FBI and et al. Those guys were fully equipped, carried live ammo in their weapons at all times - they weren't playing around and couldn't because the enemy, whomever or whatever they might be, certainly wasn't.
 
 

18 posted on 11/05/2013 1:21:37 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
There was an upturn in train derailments during the war years. “Accidents” the government said. Others still believe it was Nazi sabotage.

The US Government refused to put guards on all overpasses and bridges, except for the major ones.

19 posted on 11/05/2013 1:22:01 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bert

I think Manchester, who was there, may have had more real information than we do now. Many facts about WWII were distorted then as well as revised now. All one has to do is look at the bombing of Hiroshima to see the contrast.


20 posted on 11/05/2013 1:31:19 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson