Posted on 11/04/2013 2:39:29 AM PST by markomalley
Hadley Heath's health insurance plan seemed to have it all. A low deductible, low monthly premium and comprehensive coverage that even included free preventative care.
But Heath's insurer, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield just sent her a letter, announcing they will terminate her plan because it lacks "Essential Health Benefits," mandated under the affordable care act.
Health is one of millions of people holding individual health insurance plans who are about to lose them. Florida Blue will drop 300,000 policies that don't meet the ACA requirements, while 150,000 Oregon residents who are signed up under individual plans will also lose their current coverage. California's Blue Shield sent termination notices for 119,000 policy holders, an official told the Washington Examiner.
Many of those policy holders are now facing higher deductibles and higher monthly premiums if they purchases a new policy under Obamacare.
In Heath's case, if she chooses the cheapest policy known as the bronze plan from the newly created health care exchanges, she will pay a $200 monthly premium, up from the $113 she pays under her soon-to-be-cancelled plan. And her deductible would increase from $2,700 per month to $3,500, according to estimates from her current insurance provider.
In the words of President Obama, Heath holds a policy issued by a a "bad apple" insurer. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius called plans like Heath's "medically underwritten," while Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said last week such plans are being eliminated because they have "flimsy" and "deficient" coverage "that disappears when people actually need it."
Waxman added, "nobody should want that."
But Heath was happy with her policy and wanted very much to keep it.
"My plan is not a junk plan," said Heath, who is a health care policy analyst at the Independent Women's Forum in Washington D.C.
"It's got emergency room care, primary care, immunizations and it has hospitalization coverage."
Heath's deductible is higher than some policies but there is no lifetime cap on coverage and she utilizes a tax-exempt medical savings account to ensure she can meet the deductible if needed.
"That way, I feel some responsibility," Heath explained.
Heath's insurer offered no details about why her plan was dropped, other than to report that it does not include one or some of the ten "essential health benefits," now required on every insurance policy under Obamacare.
According to the healtcare.gov website, all health care plans must include ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment, prescription drugs, rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices, laboratory services, preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management, and pediatric services, including oral and vision care.
Heath, who is 25 and doesn't have children, said she wasn't looking for a plan that included things like pediatric dentistry, chronic disease management or substance abuse help.
"I feel a little insulted," Heath said. "I'm a grown up. Let me decide what's best for me. I think I should be in charge of that."
By some estimates, up to 80 percent of the individual market, which includes as many as 16 million people, will lose their plan because it does not meet the new coverage standards under Obamacare. And new reports suggest when the employer mandate kicks in next year, tens of millions more people will be dumped from their employer-sponsored plans and into the health care exchanges.
The Obama administration, meanwhile, has continued to defend the cancellations of individually purchased policies as necessary in order to rid the market of so-called junk plans.
In California, Blue Shield decided not to allow any customers to keep their individual plans. They sent cancellation notices to all 119,000 of their policy holders.
"It would have been difficult to find plans that had all ten essential health benefits," Stephan Shivinsky, Blue Shield's vice president of corporate communications, told the Examiner.
Policies purchased before the health care law took effect in March 2010 are supposed to be exempted by the new health care law requirements, so long as they do not alter their coverage or prices too dramatically.
On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace challenged an Obamacare architect, Ezekiel Emanuel, on the administration's exclusion of policies that have as little as a $5 increase for co-payments.
"That's usually a 25 percent change," Emanuel said. "That's a big change."
Mike Tanner, a health care policy scholar at the libertarian Cato Institute, said people are discovering that the plans offered on the health care exchanges are not always cheaper, in part because more comprehensive coverage is required and because the costs are shifted around to cover the sickest. Young people like Heath, Tanner said, "are getting charged significantly higher premiums."
Independent Women's Voice has launched the website, mycancellation.gov to showcase the the cancellations letters people are receiving from health insurance companies.
A Blue Cross Blue Shield letter posted Sunday from a North Carolina policy holder showed a 2013 premium of $456 per month increasing to $1,260 per month.
Another letter, also posted Sunday, showed a policy holder losing a plan that costs $367 per month and being offered a plan for a monthly rate of $641. The deductible on the new plan would increase from $2,200 out-of-pocket maximum for an individual plan, to $6,350.
Wonder when the “small sacrifice for the greater good” propaganda machine starts playing.
Let it. Obamacare couldn’t do anything BUT paint itself into a corner. It’s only a matter of when and how, not whether.
I think some of the focus of this fiasco should be placed on Blue Cross also. They did not lobby against the new law and in fact they supported it because, tada, they knew it would benefit them financially. Everyone of the plans I see cancelled seemed to be issued before by Blue Cross. It is a mutual tax exempt entity which means it is owned by the policy holders and is SUPPOSED to act in the best interests of its policy holders. No, it acts in the best interests of its maggot managers. In fact in Florida, they changed their own charter to accommodate the new law and began working on this change as soon as the law passed.
Anyone, tell me, if you had to choose, would you pay for a good brain surgeon or the guy who was doing them for "free"?
Lets start documenting exactly what Obamacare considers “substandard”.
Is it abortion?
Coverage for kids you don’t have?
Maternity coverage for kids you CAN’T HAVE?
"It's got emergency room care, primary care, immunizations and it has hospitalization coverage."
Clearly, Ms. Heath is too stupid to know what is best for her. That is why the democRATs have to make these decisions FOR her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.