Look at my posting history. Your accusations aren’t worth a response.
YOU posted an article suggesting that it would be better PR to promote a Con-Con in euphemistic terminology.
THAT is your posting history.
I suggested that it’s the left that whines that their ideas only lack for support because that haven’t been sold the right way.
Why don’t you propose an Art V con-con on the basis of what Art V says.
Show me the phrase, “Convention of States” in Art. V. What I can show you in the plain language of the Art. is that Congress has the authority both to call such a Convention and to choose its mode of ratification, i.e. a federal Con-Con.
Oh, snap.