The Hawaii Registrar verified what the Secretary of State of Arizona asked him to verify in specific questions. Among those specific questions were that the father’s birthplace was “Kenya, East Africa” and the mother’s birthplace was “Wichita, Kansas.” Guess who was born in those locations.
Dr. Onaka also verified that the data on the whitehouse.gov version of the Certificate of Live Birth matched the data on the vault edition original birth certificate.
I can guarantee you that there is no judicial authority in the U.S. who wouldn’t accept that as 100% verification of the circumstances of birth.
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/Obama-Verification.pdf
And if anyone should ever require additional verification of the actual names of the persons listed as parents, Dr. Onaka is alive, well and able to further confirm or testify at any time. But since the Letter of Verification was issued on May 22, 2012, no one has made that request of Dr. Onaka.
Yet, Hawaii REFUSES to show ANY COPY of said certificate.
Mike Zullo spoke to a bunch of SOS’s, and NONE OF THEM would accept a “verification” that wouldn’t even verify a birth date as proof of anything.
AZ SOS Ken BEnnett assumed that the birthdate went unverified because it was a “mistake”. Apparently leaving off male, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama was just a mistake also. Hey, a 0% verification rate on facts submitted on the application form is good enough for government work, eh?
But this thread is not the place for this, so I’m not going to sabotage the thread with discussing the ins and outs of that.
Candidates and voters deserve to know the rules of the game before the game is over, and it’s way past time for the refs to stop saying that knowing what rules we have to play by is none of our business. That’s what we should all be able to agree on, and it is a critical issue.