“Great. So long has he denounces his Canadian citizenship, then, sounds like he’s good to go.”
He has done that.
If just not being naturalized means a person is natural born, then there would be no need for him to renounce his Canadian citizenship. He could be a country of every nation in the world and still be a natural born US citizen, if just not having to naturalize to be a US citizen makes you a natural born citizen.
That’s one of those issues where different inferences can be made.
The laws involving a person renouncing US citizenship also comes in to play. A person who has renounced their US citizenship is not a US citizen at all, but if being BORN a US citizen is all that is meant by natural born citizen then a person could not even be a current US citizen and still be a “natural born citizen”.
What I’m trying to say is that there are a multitude of inferences that can be made, and they might all make sense to different people, but the only ones that are legally binding are the ones actually decided by the judiciary. We need the judiciary to tell us what the rules of the NBC game are BEFORE we get 2 seconds away from the final buzzer. It doesn’t matter what the players say the rules are. What matters is what the OFFICIALS say the rules are, and no way is it a fair or right game if the players are not ALLOWED to know the rules before the game starts. It’s pure crap, the idea that the officials can tell us it’s none of our business what the rules are, until after we’ve already lost the game according to their unknown, hidden rules.