Posted on 10/16/2013 4:57:44 PM PDT by Syncro
IT DEPENDS ON WHAT THE MEANING OF 'SETTLED LAW' IS
October 16, 2013No major legislation has ever been passed like Obamacare -- and I'm using the word "passed" pretty loosely.
It became law without both houses ever voting on the same bill. (Say, is the Constitution considered "settled law"?) Not one Republican voted for it -- and a lot of Democrats immediately wished they hadn't.
Historically, big laws have been enacted with large, bipartisan majorities. In 1935, President Roosevelt enacted Social Security with a 372-33 vote in the House and 77-6 in the Senate.
In 1965, Medicare passed in the Senate 70-24 and the House 307-116, with the vast majority of Democrats supporting this Ponzi scheme and Republicans roughly split.
Reagan's magnificent tax cuts in 1981 -- which Democrats now denounce as if they'd been appalled at the time -- passed with a vote of 89-11 in the Senate and even 323-107 in the hostile Democratic House.
Even Bill Clinton's signature legislative achievement -- Midnight Basketball for the Homeless -- received more bipartisan support than Obamacare.
No law, certainly not one that fundamentally alters the role of the government, has ever been passed like this.
But now, this greased-through, irregular law is relentlessly defended as "settled law" and "the law of the land"! (At least the parts that Obama hasn't unconstitutionally waived -- again, anybody know if the Constitution is "settled law"?)
Wow -- Obamacare sounds fantastic! Not only does Congress refuse to live under it, but its proponents' strongest argument is that it's "settled law!"
The most hilarious part of the "settled law" argument is that it's coming from the left, for whom nothing is ever "settled" until they get their way -- as described in my new book, Never Trust a Liberal Over Three-Especially a Republican.
Did you support Romney too like she did? She is no friend of the Tea Party, except to perhaps buy her books.
Pray America is Waking Up
Dems use selective “hearing”, selective justice...ie Holder and allowing “his people” to break laws, stand at polling locations with weapons to keep whites from voting, selective enforcing of laws, block WWII vets from visiting their memorial in DC while at the same time allowing illegal alien criminal invading colonists to us the National Mall for a protest/rally.
Drivers licenses for illegal criminal non citizens in California, plus the Gov there just passed a law so male preverts can go into little girls bathrooms.
It goes on and on, the dems growing their voter base.
Growing the voter base for dems is "settled law"...right!
Oops sorry for the tangent...heh
She is friends with lots of tea partiers.
I never supported Romney.
And she supported Christie.
You know, Obama’s buddy in NJ.
As much as I’d like to share this the link takes me back to either another story or one with no title.
I do not suffer from any syndrome, as you on the left like to claim about anyone who opposes you and those you love and worship.
I just remember those who are prostitutes for the fascists, and she is one who does, after all she dated Bill Maher, which I guess you may have dated him to. My guess is you think Bush and Rove are conservatives too....
Her threads used to get hundreds of posts, and demands for lots of pictures of her, not it is reduced to only the leftist syncophant’s that are Roveist’s or Bushbots or Moroons for Christi.
So many her have left her as she left us. And no she is NO friend of the TEA Party.
I never saw George of the Jungle. I googled it—a cartoon. Figures YOU would know all about it. It seems that cartoons are YOUR speed. Good for you.
This column is there.
Next week her new column will be on her home page, www.anncoulter.com.
Then this one will join all the others in her archives, which is a clickable link to the upper right from the title.
Sorry you couldn't access the link, must have been a glitch.
Try again, it should work just fine.
Quite germane, thanks Travis!
I do not suffer from any syndrome, as you on the left like to claim about anyone who opposes you and those you love and worship.
Typical symptom (in bold) of Coulter Emasculation Syndrome. Belittling another person when you have no substantive comments to make.
You are closing in on pissant's tactics, he imploded quite some time ago.
I guess you may have dated him to.
No stockpirate, never assume others have the same desires that you do.
Her threads used to get hundreds of posts, and demands for lots of pictures of her, not it is (make up your mind, not it is??? Makes more sense if you said it "is not" ) reduced to only the leftist syncophants that are Roveists or Bushbots or Moroons for Christi.Settle down, your sentences and spelling are atrotious. Hard to know what you are trying to communicate.So many her have left her as she left us.
Why do you care, you have given up anyway.
A quote from you a few days ago:
Soon, very soon the radical fascists on the left will be taking us out to the desert to rid the country of Tea Party people and Christians, and we will smile all the while...Sorry, there are some of us that will resist while you will smile when being led off.
Remember when this was a free country?
Is “settled law” anything like the “settled science” of anthropogenic global warming? < /sarc >
Nice try however you attacked me first so playing the belittling others card doesn’t work moron.
You should check for the recent posts here that has Ann belittling the TEA Party, yet again.
And no I have not given up, but with RINO’s like you and the Bushbots we will have a hard timing just standing our ground.
She has our book money to pay for the prevention of her prune face from showing.
She's trying to sell another book. Blank me once, shame on me.
I keep saying that her and Maher planned for each to hornswoggle their own side
for millions. And look, it worked. Neither give a crap about politics, only elitist gain.
We've all been duped.
It was you that attacked Coulter and me in #37 and this post I am replying to is a weak attempt on your part to try to Alinsky me by making up something that did NOT happen.
I was countering the dig you threw out at your first post on this thread.
Now you are calling names? How juvenile.
If you don't have links to back up your statements about Coulter then you are just blowing smoke.
From post 55:
“And no I have not given up, but with RINOs like you and the Bushbots we will have a hard timing (timing?) just standing our ground.”
Hmmm making up more stuff about me. Don't you have a better argument than throwing lies like that around? (RINO/Bushbots)
This looks like giving up to me, a quote from YOU:
Soon, very soon the radical fascists on the left will be taking us out to the desert to rid the country of Tea Party people and Christians, and we will smile all the while...
Sad.
Go psss up a stump loser
You filthy liar, I despise all those shows
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.