Posted on 10/16/2013 8:11:10 AM PDT by Dave346
In Yom Kippur War anniversary speech, prime minister suggests that inaction on Iran is costlier than international opprobrium
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered a thinly veiled defense of a possible Israeli preemptive strike on Iran during a Knesset commemoration Tuesday of the 40th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War.
In a speech to MKs about the war, in which Israel was surprised by a coordinated Arab invasion on the northern and southern fronts, Netanyahu explained that IDF soldiers who fought in the bitter battles of that war saved us from paying the price of complacency.
In the end we won a great victory, but the lessons of the war have stayed with us these 40 years, Netanyahu said.
The first lesson is to never underestimate a threat, never underestimate an enemy, never ignore the signs of danger. We cant assume the enemy will act in ways that are convenient for us. The enemy can surprise us. Israel will not fall asleep on its watch again, he vowed.
The second lesson, he added, was that we cant surrender the option of a preventive strike. It is not necessary in every situation, and it must be weighed carefully and seriously. But there are situations in which paying heed to the international price of such a step is outweighed by the price in blood we will pay if we absorb a strategic strike that will demand a response later on, and perhaps too late.
Netanyahu added: A preventive war, even a preventive strike, is among the most difficult decisions a government can take, because it will never be able to prove what would have happened if it had not acted. But the key difference between the [1967] Six Day War and the [1973] Yom Kippur War lies first of all in the fact that in the Six Day War we launched a preventive strike that broke the chokehold our enemies had placed on us, and on Yom Kippur the government decided, despite all warnings, to absorb the full force of an enemy attack.
The prime minister is engaged in a blitz of international meetings and interviews warning against any slackening of international sanctions directed at the Iranian regime over its nuclear enrichment program. Netanyahu has openly threatened that Israel would unilaterally attack the Iranian nuclear program if it was allowed to advance to the point where Iran was able to develop a nuclear weapon.
Sources close to the Prime Ministers Office suggested the Tuesday speech was directed at the Iranian issue.
Netanyahu also offered hints at Israels negotiating position in peace talks with the Palestinians.
The third lesson of the war, he said, is the strategic importance of buffer zones. [Israels] control of the Golan [Heights] and the Sinai Peninsula [in 1973] prevented an enemy penetration deep into the country in the first days of the war.
Press reports sourced to leaks from the peace talks with the Palestinians have suggested in recent days that Israel seeks to retain security control over the Jordan Valley as a buffer zone to the east.
And, Netanyahu said, there is a fourth lesson: Peace is attained from a position of strength. In the Yom Kippur War, despite the enemys excellent opening position, they learned they could not best us with weapons. Five years later, [Egyptian president Anwar] Sadat and [prime minister Menachem] Begin signed a peace deal, and later [peace accords were signed] with Jordan.
Now we are engaged in a serious investment in [making] peace with the Palestinians, Netanyahu added. Peace was achieved when our neighbors understood we are powerful and will not disappear.
Later Tuesday, while observing a training exercise of the 7th Armored Corps Brigade on the Golan Heights, Netanyahu spoke about the P5+1 nuclear talks underway in Geneva between Iranian nuclear negotiators and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany.
I think that it would be a historic mistake to ease up on Iran without it dismantling the nuclear capabilities it is developing, Netanyahu said. Iran is now on the ropes, and it is possible to employ sanctions at their fullest in order to achieve the desired result. I hope that the international community will do this, and I call upon it to do so.
I stand with Israel.
If there is a strike, the USA should be there to back Israel!
Operation Opera - preemptive strike on Osirak (Iran's turn ...?)
We'd like to support Israel but since the Republicans attacked our economy, we just can't help right now. So sorry.
Your friend Barry.
God will bless those who bless Israel and He will hammer into dust those who do not bless and support Israel. Our Muslin president does not support Israel, thus has brought JUDGMENT upon America! Plus, America has also worked herself into judgment by her own actions. Double judgment upon America will come by the hand of the Lord. America without TOTAL repentance will be driven into the ground. Scoff if you might, that will not change it. It will still come. Time running short for all to make the choice. That choice is upon all shoulders of all who don’t believe.
Will the Saudis tacitly cooperate this time? Iran is a huge threat to all the Arab states in the region, and their version of Islam actually aggravates the threat. The Saudi princes don’t want their solid gold lifestyles interfered with, and Israel has never threatened to do so.
Netanyahu & Israel are going to be universally condemned no matter what they do; their mere existence is an offense to the muzzie `Ummah’. Which is worse, regretting what you did, or what you could have done but failed to?
Would be interesting to know just which indications of imminent military action would have even the mullahs going “Uh-oh, something’s about to go down”?
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, I wonder when the attack will take place?
I believe you are right sir.
Retired Air Force.
bttt
Under the Bathhouse Barry regime, the US will be there to back Iran and condemn Israel.
If Iran's economy is truly on the ropes, then some "unforseen" event like a bad accident at their major refinery complex at Abadan would really push them.
Here's hoping for an unfortunate and "surprise" uh...accident (yeah, an ACCIDENT - THAT'S the ticket!) at Abadan.
What kind of radioactivity can we expect? I’ve heard a lot of talk of strikes on Iranian reactors, but no talk of of radioactive release.
Maybe we should ask the Japanese. I think they have some experience with this.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
I wonder how desperate the Saudis are getting? An airbase in SA - even just a dirt strip - would be a helluva force multiplier.
...inaction on Iran is costlier than international opprobrium... "...never underestimate a threat, never underestimate an enemy, never ignore the signs of danger. We can't assume the enemy will act in ways that are convenient for us. The enemy can surprise us. Israel will not fall asleep on its watch again... we cant surrender the option of a preventive strike. It is not necessary in every situation, and it must be weighed carefully and seriously. But there are situations in which paying heed to the international price of such a step is outweighed by the price in blood we will pay if we absorb a strategic strike that will demand a response later on, and perhaps too late... A preventive war, even a preventive strike, is among the most difficult decisions a government can take, because it will never be able to prove what would have happened if it had not acted. But the key difference between the [1967] Six Day War and the [1973] Yom Kippur War lies first of all in the fact that in the Six Day War we launched a preventive strike that broke the chokehold our enemies had placed on us, and on Yom Kippur the government decided, despite all warnings, to absorb the full force of an enemy attack." ...Netanyahu has openly threatened that Israel would unilaterally attack the Iranian nuclear program if it was allowed to advance to the point where Iran was able to develop a nuclear weapon... "The third lesson... is the strategic importance of buffer zones. [Israel's] control of the Golan [Heights] and the Sinai Peninsula [in 1973] prevented an enemy penetration deep into the country" in the first days of the war... "there is a fourth lesson: Peace is attained from a position of strength. In the Yom Kippur War, despite the enemys excellent opening position, they learned they could not best us with weapons. Five years later, [Egyptian president Anwar] Sadat and [prime minister Menachem] Begin signed a peace deal, and later [peace accords were signed] with Jordan... Peace was achieved when our neighbors understood we are powerful and will not disappear... Iran is now on the ropes, and it is possible to employ sanctions at their fullest in order to achieve the desired result. I hope that the international community will do this, and I call upon it to do so."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.