The ObamaBots have to “salt” the stats so they aren’t so puny when they report them. If those millions of young people don’t foolishly sign up, ObamaDon’tCare is toast.
Were is suxnet when you need it? ;-)
Actually the website was done by Canadians LOL
Nail it Shut.
Gubment workers screwed this up during their weekdays. I doubt they work weekends and if they do, it will be especially shoddy work.
With all the problems they’ve had rolling it out, you’d think that the left would be embracing a one year delay...not fighting it.
GEeez...glad DEar Leader’s IT crew doesn’t run the stock exchange!
Having the website fail buys the Regime time from the otherwise inevitable insurrection by his supporters. The problem for Obama comes not from the House Republicans but from the unions and other supporters who will be repulsed by this abomination.
I'm also very certain there have been lots of "it is exactly what I asked for, but it is not what I wanted" moments.
The Democrats deserve these results.
And here I almost thought they’d noticed what raging hypocrites they are leaving that site up and deliberately taking many other public-facing sites down.
So, is there some reason the contractor couldn’t have simulated a year ago several million users attempting to use the web site simultaneously?
If you visit the Obamacare website, you’re almost guaranteed to be a loser. Either you won’t get anywhere, you’ll be offered a policy you can’t afford, or you’ll decline the policy and be fined by the federal government.
They could not make it work with two years, what makes them think they can get it to work over the weekend.
closed to fix broken crap and add a whole ton of fake enrollees to boost the numbers.
It was thrown together hastily, probably under orders to “get it up and running or else”
There was not enough time to make it work right. It was not tested enough. The connections and interactions were not tested.
If a bank had set up a website like that, the government would be on its back and fine the bank big time.
But it’s the government that created a mess. Who will fine the government?
And to add insult to injury, I’ll bet that they didn’t program any security in the system, so the moment it goes live, I’ll bet the hackers try to get in.
<><> “The plan that Congress is considering will provide health insurance to millions of Americans who don’t have it and control costs for millions more who do.” — Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa, calling for Congress to pass ObamaCare, March 16, 2010
<><> “Right now, unless you and the Obama administration enact an equitable fix, the ACA will shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits, but destroy the foundation of the 40-hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class.”— Hoffa in a July 2013 letter to Sen. Harry Reid and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the top Senate and House Democrats.
TALKING POINTS---A West Virginia nonprofit has turned down a federal grant it received to help residents navigate new health insurance options under the Affordable Care Act after it received an inquiry from Attorney General Patrick Morrisey about how it would protect consumer information. Clarksburg-based West Virginia Parent Training Inc. did not respond to a letter it received from Morrisey directing it to answer 26 questions about the group's personnel and hiring practices, including employee background checks and employee monitoring programs, the Sunday Gazette-Mail (http://bit.ly/17M1QVe) reported. (Excerpt) Read more at sanluisobispo.com ...
YOUR TURN--Contact your state AG---ask him/her to issue a letter of inquiry to groups receiving federal "Navigator" grants. The inquiry should center on questions WRT how the group intends to protect consumer data.
In particular, the questionnaire should ask if the tax-funded "Navigator" program intends to transfer personal/ financial/medical data of the insured to the local/county/national Democrat Party, relevant Unions, banks, investment companies, drug companies, insurance companies. Trial Lawyers' associations and whether "Navigators" have sub rosa contracts with these, and other groups, plan to profit, to provide significant info to enrich databases for pecuniary purposes.
The AG also needs to confirm (1) whether the "navigator" was ever convicted of a felony....... and....(2) whether the "navigator" can be bonded.
Most importantly demand that your AG enforce the requirement that "Navigators" must have a state insurance license (consists of a comprehensive test on all aspects of insurance and compels a background check).