Posted on 10/03/2013 9:35:06 AM PDT by ColdOne
full title....'How do you know I wasn't handcuffed?' Hannah Anderson hits back at critics who questioned her 'odd behavior' after friend murdered her mom and brother - as she shows off new boyfriend
The teenage girl who was rescued after being kidnapped by her close family friend that killed her mother and brother has broken her silence once more, fighting back at critics who accuse her of acting strangely in the wake of the tragedy.
Hannah Anderson has tried returning to her earlier life as 16-year-old California high school student, but the memory of her abduction and the lingering questions about her brother and mother's murders continue to creep their way into her daily conversations.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Caril Ann Fugate
Patty Lynn Hearst.
If you’ve been cuffed there are usually bruises on your wrists.
Uhhh, so I’ve heard...
She’s an attention whore — she was only able to go a month without it.
Stockholm Syndrome...
Maybe, but I think she was in on it from day 1 and a willing participant.
Yep!
Missed clues & unanswered questions in the Hannah Anderson case
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3060217/posts
The missed clues are still missing and the unanswered questions remain unanswered.
She was probably a willing participant in the “kidnapping” but I’d wager she wasnt in the killing.
Don’t forget she did signal the people who ran into the two of them at that lake.
Two words: Marlene Olive.
She does seem to have been addicted to attention, with all of her look at me, me, me-and are they ever going to search for the missing info about the murder and abduction?
Did one of the employees at Kreditbanken of Norrmalmstorg correspond regularly with the hostage takers? Did one of the employees text the bank robbers in advance a dozen times on the day of the robbery? I don’t seem to recall that happening...
She certainly wasn’t handcuffed when the hikers saw them on the trail. There were no bruises on her the day after her “rescue” when she was photographed getting out of the car in shorts, sporting a new cell phone and a fresh manicure.
How could she have been on her cell phone all that day, yet have it burned in the fire if she didn’t know anything?
Yeah, after being kidnapped, my family killed, my dog killed and my house burned to the ground along with everything I owned I’d be kissing a new bf, shopping for a new homecoming dress and smiling big for the cameras. Not. Any bets she wrapped DiMaggio around her little finger to do this because she was mad at her mother? Now it’s her word against, well, no one’s since DiMaggio’s not talking and the cops can’t see past her short shorts.
That didn’t happen with Patty Hurst, either, but like then, Stockholm Syndrome is going to be the raison du jour given for the girl’s behavior if an investigation finds her complicit and she hires an attorney...
Blah, not her house burned but still.
“...her short shorts...”
This thread is useless without those pics.
I notice that she never actually answered that question or stated whether she was handcuffed or not???
I continue to hold reservations about this case, which saddens me. Really hope that the truth of truths is that she’s just an awkward, but innocent victim. We may never know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.