Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Betsy McCaughey to Mark Levin: “[This law] is NOT the Affordable Care Act”
http://therightscoop.com ^ | October 1, 2013 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 10/01/2013 9:02:56 PM PDT by Whenifhow

Betsy McCaughey made a great point tonight in an interview with Mark Levin, noting that the Affordable Care Act that was passed by Congress, signed by Obama and upheld by the Supreme Court is not the same law that Obama is currently imposing on the American people. McCaughey says that with all the changes Obama has made to ACA, it is now nothing more than a ‘distorted little piece of the Affordable Care Act’ and says it doesn’t have the status of law because it’s not what they passed:

MCCAUGHEY: I have the Obama health law right here in front of me and I think about how different what the president’s health reform today is from that law. I hear the Democrats say all the time ‘well it was passed by Congress, it was signed by the president and it was vetted by the Supreme Court.’ But what the president is imposing on us today is not the Affordable Care Act.

LEVIN: Stop! Stop! That is a very important point. Wait a minute, Congress passed, the president signed, the Supreme Court upheld…and your point is since then Obama has changed the law and nobody and nothing has passed on that. Brilliant!

MCCAUGHEY: Oh yes exactly. He has stripped the employer mandate, income verification, caps on out of pocket expenses, over half the statutory deadlines in the law. So now he’s had this very distorted little piece of the Affordable Care Act and he’s tacked new things onto it, 1472 waivers. And how about this new subsidy for members of Congress that he weaseled through without congressional approval. All of this means that this reform doesn’t have the status of law.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: betsymccaughey; budget; insurance; iwillnotcomply; marklevin; obamacare; shutdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Whenifhow

bttt


41 posted on 10/01/2013 9:57:08 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Thanks. Handicapped with an old XP program that needs updating, and on dialup the reason XP needs updating, or I’d happily read your links. Kinda leaves me out of the loop on some things.

Thanks again.


42 posted on 10/01/2013 9:59:23 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Whenifhow :" At the same time, he did not rewrite the law to delay the “individual mandate,”…"

The last I knew, Congress wrote laws
The House funded the laws..
and the EXECUTIVE was supposed to implement (execute) laws
The Executive re-writing laws isn't within his perview, and is a violation of his oath of office : "To execute the law..",
furthermore , it offsets the system of checks and balances that our republic depends on .
I guess , since he has his own man in the dept. of " JUST-US ", he figures he is above the law, much less obey the law .
FUBO

43 posted on 10/01/2013 10:11:49 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Now we are getting somewhere. What exactly is in those thousands of pages added to what was the original law. Why would anyone want to sign up for anything they didn’t know what was in it? Sounds kind of dumb.


44 posted on 10/01/2013 10:11:51 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

I think you’re right but I doubt the Repubs have the guts for this fight. My red line was crossed when Chrysler went bk and bammy stole the bondholders equity and gave it to the UMW. He broke the contract between me and the Federal government at that point. Join the party.


45 posted on 10/01/2013 10:14:30 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statue of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

Chrysler went bk and bammy stole the bondholders
*********
That was an impeachable offense. He should have been impeached on the spot for that deed. Look where we are now - it will be much more difficult now.


46 posted on 10/01/2013 10:19:25 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Whenifhow:" My take is that we must enforce the law vigorously so that people will see just how bad it is - in particular those congress critters should be included in the law. If they are not subject to the law they will not find the courage to change it."

Agreed !!
There should be a Constitutional Amendment that "Congress shall not order any law to any citizen that they , themselves, are not subject to "
Let them stew in their own juices !!

47 posted on 10/01/2013 10:26:58 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
freekitty~:" What exactly is in those thousands of pages added to what was the original law."

Those were interpretations of the law by the bureaucracy.
The passed law was 1800 pages, as I remember.
The law , along with the bureaucratic interpretations now runs 7 1/2 feet tall ~ that isn't just 1800 pages !

Why would anyone want to sign up for anything they didn’t know what was in it? Sounds kind of dumb.

Ask Nancy Pelosi :
She vouched for Obama's authenticity
She vouched for OBamaCrap when she said :"You gotta pass it, to find out what's in it ".
Well , it got passed , and is now 7 1/2 feet tall ( and it wasn't 7 1/2 feet tall when it got passed ! )
"Bait and Switch "~ Typical tactic of the Libtards !

48 posted on 10/01/2013 10:36:37 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Ignore me. Misspelled something.


49 posted on 10/01/2013 10:56:36 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Girlene; Jane Long

I realize he has made a lot of changes...but what was the legal basis?
*********
Betsy is the expert on Obamacare, so if she says it - it must be so.

In much of the HC bill, the language used was “as the secretary shall deem necessary” or something to that effect.. which is vague and allows for some flexibility. However, the waivers were not part of the original law.

Video - Betsy shows visually how little is left of the original law.

1:58 Minutes
Betsy McCaughey Explains Executive Unconstitutional Nature of Obamacare
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OILDVcNo3Hw


50 posted on 10/01/2013 11:00:58 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

“..This needs to be sent to EVERY Rep in DC!!”

And every FReeper should write a letter to the editor about it in their hometown newspaper, because many of the reps won’t care. When I write a letter to the editor, I often ask readers to please call their reps.


51 posted on 10/01/2013 11:04:55 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sun

SCOTT WALKER WON!!! THE TEA PARTY WON FOR SCOTT WALKER!!!
WHY? The sheeple hate people having what they don’t have,
congress critters are getting FREE healthcare FREE PLATINUM HEALTHCARE!!! WE ARE PAYING FOR IT!!! The sheeple are paying for
it!!! TAKE TO SOCIAL MEDIA, STAND WITH CRUZ!!!!


52 posted on 10/01/2013 11:12:29 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Dictatorship.


53 posted on 10/01/2013 11:25:13 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

The Repubs blew it back when the House sent over a Bill which the Senate gutted then inserted the ACA. THAT was when the battle should’ve occurred and FOUL been declared.


54 posted on 10/01/2013 11:31:33 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Someone early on should have asked the president if he would resign if his promises proved false.

It is not too late to ask the man this on future promises.


55 posted on 10/02/2013 12:03:49 AM PDT by Joe Bfstplk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

I was listening to this live yesterday and it really clicked to hear her say this. I think Mark and I yelled “stop stop” at the same time. They could hear me though.


56 posted on 10/02/2013 1:41:10 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (What's the frequency, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

Native Americans are exempt and I was born here and thusly “Native”.

All my carbon is American sourced.


57 posted on 10/02/2013 4:24:43 AM PDT by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Thanks for the video. Betsy is on of the few people who has actually read the bill, understands it, and is able to explain it. She warned about the navigators - essentially a new ACORN type group, when no one else was talking about them.


58 posted on 10/02/2013 4:40:15 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

It was 2700 pages plus a few. Nancy Pelosi also verified that Obama was the President. Remember that? We all know Congress puts amendments in other bills to hide them; however, this is not the original bill signed into law. We also all know the original Obamacare is illegal and really not the law.


59 posted on 10/02/2013 7:32:31 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
freekitty:

"..this is not the original bill signed into law."

EXACTLY TRUE !!


60 posted on 10/02/2013 2:07:30 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson