Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Part-Timers Losing Health Insurance May Want To Thank Their Companies
Yahoo News ^ | September 20, 2013 | Rick Newman

Posted on 09/20/2013 4:33:12 PM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy

How terrible. Home Depot (HD) and Trader Joe’s have decided to stop offering health insurance for part-time employees, moving them over to Obamacare instead. More companies seem sure to follow. And more wailing about greedy, heartless corporations is sure to follow that. Some workers may start to drop dead from sheer anxiety before Obamacare even goes into effect on January 1.

Once the new health law has been in place for a few months, however, Part-Time America may issue a collective sigh of relief. Nobody ever held up today’s part-time "mini-med" plans as model coverage. The majority of part-time workers don’t even get health insurance, and those who do typically get diluted plans with limited benefits they still have to pay something for. “You have to question whether that’s really insurance,” says Paul Fronstin, director of the health research program at the Employee Benefits Research institute. “They may not cover prescription drugs, and if you get cancer or end up in the hospital, they probably won’t help you a whole lot.”

Insurance offered under the Affordable Care Act, by contrast, could end up being a much better deal. Obamacare is complicated, and it will require many people to do detailed research on their insurance options instead of having an employer do it for them. There have also been elaborate efforts by foes of the program to depict it as The Ruination of Everything. So it’s not surprising that part-timers being told their employer is cutting them loose and sending them over to Obamacare are a little jumpy.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; obamablogger; obamacare; parttimeworkers; theexchange; zerocare
Or course it's not Obama's fault. It's those evil companies trying to make a profit and stay in bussiness. If it weren't for low information news, we might not have as many low information voters.
1 posted on 09/20/2013 4:33:12 PM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Thank you for saying it, thank flipping scumbama for the economic devastation he’s about to shove down your throats.


2 posted on 09/20/2013 4:35:45 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

I see this as a good thing.
Any initiative that separates health care from employment is a positive step.
The outrageous inflation in health care costs began when the consumer was insulated from the costs.


3 posted on 09/20/2013 4:38:48 PM PDT by nascarnation (Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and Media. It's an uphill climb....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy
Or course it's not Obama's fault. It's those evil companies trying to make a profit and stay in business.

We haven't heard about businesses shipping jobs overseas, but they will. It's just going to take a while.

4 posted on 09/20/2013 4:43:28 PM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

...diluted plans with limited benefits they still have to pay something for. “You have to question whether that’s really insurance,”
Oh, the horrors!


5 posted on 09/20/2013 4:43:32 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I see this as a good thing.
Any initiative that separates health care from employment is a positive step.
The outrageous inflation in health care costs began when the consumer was insulated from the costs.


Yeah, but sending them to the government instead, through bait and switch subsidies isn’t going to help. I think it’s all a ploy to make a huge mess and get the low information folks to demand single payer as the government solution.


6 posted on 09/20/2013 4:51:51 PM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Except in the situations this article addresses, low-income part-timers will be heavily subsidized by taxpayers while getting their coverage from an Obamacare exchange.


7 posted on 09/20/2013 4:59:23 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

No, they should tbe thanking their PRES__ENT.


8 posted on 09/20/2013 5:05:02 PM PDT by lightman (Prosecute the heresies; pity the heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

You may be right.
In my area, most HD/Lowes folks are retirees or spouses.
Very few “low income breadwinners”.


9 posted on 09/20/2013 5:07:11 PM PDT by nascarnation (Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and Media. It's an uphill climb....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

Yeah. The part they fail to mention is that these people will now find themselves working less hours and making less money. I’m sure they’ll have a lot to be thankful for.


10 posted on 09/20/2013 5:31:04 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

The author has totally missed several key flaws. He’s probably a hired 0-info troll anyways.
1. It’s far from certain that there will be enough providers enrolled in exchanges, especially since many exchange insurance companies appear to be intentionally limiting the number of providers. A lot of providers will probably decide not sign up as well.
2. I can’t see why healthy young people will sign up for 0-care, when the penalty is so low (or just not take the refund) These people have few assets, and they could sign up if they get sick or qualify for Medicaid if sick.
3. The paperwork will be a pain in the ass.
4. As the healthy realize that there is no value in signing up and overpaying for something they will not use, the costs for the exchange will go up as the pool gets sicker. Then, the subsidies will cover substantially less of the cost unless the subsidies are based on a percentage. If subsidies are based on a percentage, states paying for 0-care and the federal government will pay more and more.


11 posted on 09/20/2013 5:31:37 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson