Posted on 09/17/2013 7:01:09 AM PDT by markomalley
Its back-to-school time across America and you know what that means: a fresh supply of stories about transgender students demanding special treatmentparticularly when it comes to bathrooms and locker rooms.
The latest spat involves an expelled transgender student at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown who has filed a federal lawsuit claiming that the school violated her civil rights by preventing her from using mens locker rooms and restrooms, reports the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
The student, Seamus Johnston, was born female but identifies as a male. Johnston has undergone several months of hormone treatment recently.
The lawsuit was filed Monday. The suit claims that the school violated federal anti-discrimination laws. Johnston is representing herself.
A Pitt spokesman told the Tribune-Review that the school plans to defend the legal challenge vigorously.
The events leading up to the lawsuit are nothing if not interesting.
Johnston was expelled from Pitt-Johnstown for repeatedly using the mens locker room despite the schools order that she not do so, explains the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Johnston, 22, and her partner, Katherine Anne McCloskey, 56, filmed an attempted (and failed) series of citizens arrests at the Pitt-Johnstown campus. McCloskey did the arresting. Johnston filmed the events. (The antics can be seen at the end of a collection of clips from WPXI on YouTube.)
We believe that you are a female and that your campus ID indicates you are a female, an unidentified staffer firmly explains after he was accosted by the couple. Your application form indicates you are a female. You went into a mens locker room. You are not permitted to do that.
Later, the FBI focused on Johnston and McCloskey during an investigation of some bomb threats made at the main Pitt in Pittsburgh. The FBI questioned the couple in 2012. There was also a federal grand jury that threatened at times to dissolve into a circus.
In May, Johnston pleaded guilty to charges in county criminal court of trespassing and disorderly conduct related to the mens locker room fracas. The sentence was 90-days probation.
The Post-Gazette notes that Johnston declared in a prior complaint with the Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations that the Social Security Administration found her disabled for a variety of emotional liabilities that included gender identity disorder.
Yes. Two girls, who for some reason have decided they “think” they are men, but they are attracted to girls, except girls who think they are men.
I think bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports teams should be an EASY thing, having nothing to do with what you “think” or “identify with”. If you have a penis, you get to use the bathroom that has the urinals. If not, you use the bathroom that is all stalls.
There’s no reason a transgender female should feel uncomfortable in a girls bathroom — after all, the transgender ARGUMENT is that normal people should NOT feel uncomfortable having an opposite-sex person in the bathroom with them, so clearly a transgender person should not feel uncomfortable having a same-sex person in the bathroom with them.
OK I read it as a girl who wants to be a boy and a man who wants to be a woman.. so confusing..
Hm. Now I think you are right, and I misread it.
SO they are heterosexuals who just can’t figure out what stereotype they should pretend to fit into.
Transgender is largely the imposition of sexist stereotypes on your own psyche. Are you too sensitive for a “man”, then you must identify as one of those emotional “women”.
Elrond has really let himself go.
Elrond has really let himself go.
Distant relative to Churchill?
Well, they're both primates.
Someone believes in safe sex - they put their pr*ck in a sheath.
I had forgotten all about that. The man’s past is a regular freak show.
I just vomited in my mouth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.