Once again, we have to go offshore to get journalism.
1 posted on
09/09/2013 11:01:19 AM PDT by
don-o
To: don-o
2 posted on
09/09/2013 11:06:01 AM PDT by
Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
(If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
To: don-o
To: don-o
With 0bama being so hot and heavy on attacking Syria, it also becomes clear that our presence in Benghazi was directly connected such a plan.
4 posted on
09/09/2013 11:08:48 AM PDT by
Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
(If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
To: don-o
Interesting that of the 100 E-mails released by the 0bama administration regarding Benghazi NOT ONE mentions the video. Not one.
5 posted on
09/09/2013 11:13:01 AM PDT by
Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
(If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
To: don-o
What about the 400 MAN-PADS at the CIA annex?
That needs to be our war-cry over Behghazi.
7 posted on
09/09/2013 11:16:33 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
To: don-o
10 posted on
09/09/2013 11:24:01 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: don-o
"The bigger question, so far unanswered, is what the CIA was doing in Benghazi. Neither the accountancy review board, the state department nor half a dozen congressional committees investigating the death of Stevens have made any public comment on the role of the CIA; nor have congressional committees tasked with performing the role of scrutinising the government on behalf of the electorate."?
11 posted on
09/09/2013 11:25:31 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Are Marines required to salute Al Qaeda yet?)
To: MestaMachine
12 posted on
09/09/2013 11:26:26 AM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: don-o
Why did Hillary and Obama use American personnel, equipment and facilities to overthrow the government of Libya?
Libya’s oil production is at 10% of what it was a year ago. Notice that the same people who attacked our compound also attacked that oil production facility. Why, it’s almost like someone is trying to reduce the production of oil and keep the price high. Russia? Saudi Arabia? Soros? Who knows? Follow the money.
16 posted on
09/09/2013 11:41:42 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: don-o
My initial guess, the day that it happened, was that Stevens was Fostered. The additional information we have learned to date, what of it that can be verified and/or appears to be credible, has done nothing but reinforce that hypothesis.
The fact that Hillary was ready with the YouTube video explanation the day of the incident is the smoking gun. You don't have a cover story ready before you know that you have something to cover up. Being pre-prepared with the coverup story strongly lends itself to the explanation that she knew that she had something to cover up - before the incident actually happened.
It is my opinion that Stevens was murdered at Hillary's direction, just as Vince Foster was, and for the same reasons - he knew too much about Hillary's dirty laundry, and had probably shown indications of a conscience, a combination too dangerous to her ambition for her to allow either man to live.
To: don-o
I hate having to reference ANYTHING thru the ‘60s Marxists at the Guardian, but seeing that it’s Obama... what the heck.
21 posted on
09/09/2013 2:39:40 PM PDT by
Deb
(If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
To: don-o
Very interesting article.
What's surprising is the Guardian's claim about the lack of bullet holes in the buildings. From the article:
The testimony of heavy fighting is hard to reconcile with the lack of bullet holes in the buildings. The villa's sandy walls are still blackened by the smoke from the fire, but there are few bullet marks here or on the other buildings, nor are there spent casings visible, at least on the paths and asphalt. The front gate has no sign of damage except two bullet holes. The only sign of heavy firing is at the rear gate, with holes from 23 rounds fired into the compound and six fired out. This gunfight is not mentioned in accounts made public. From the time of the attack to the time they were summoned, four of the five DSS agents were in hiding.................
And then at the CIA compound
........... The lack of bullet marks on the walls of the facility does not square with reports that it was assaulted. Rockets were fired at one wall, and mortar bombs struck the roof, suggesting the firing was opportunistic and from a distance, rather than an attempt to overrun the CIA compound.
Where were the heavy firefights?
22 posted on
09/09/2013 8:26:30 PM PDT by
Girlene
(Hey, NSA!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson