Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/07/2013 8:28:13 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: RoosterRedux

As long as Obama keeps his minions fed, they won’t abandon him - no matter what he does. The moment the federal gravy train runs dry, “Holder’s people” will go Ceausecu on him.


2 posted on 09/07/2013 8:44:26 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
I had to read into the article to find out which Democratic President was considered the first anti-American President.

The author says the 1953 coup in Iran happened in Stalin's lifetime--actually it happened in August, a few months after Stalin's death.

3 posted on 09/07/2013 8:47:01 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Outstanding article, thanks for posting.


5 posted on 09/07/2013 8:50:20 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Impeach the wannabe dictator!!


6 posted on 09/07/2013 8:51:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

“Without the Taliban, the Twin Towers would still be standing in Manhattan. Today Obama is trying to make friends with them.”

eh?


7 posted on 09/07/2013 8:54:50 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Who would have ever thought that we'd elect an anti-American for _Resident ??
Why he'd have to keep his thoughts to himself , read only from telepromters, vote "Present" during significant legislation ,
and isolate himself from public opinion, and establish a propaganda machine in the media
and in a complicit press to cover up his failures.
That some legislator would call him a liar, even as that official lied to a mass of legislators and the American people on TV ?
Why would we ever elect such a politician ?
We would never do that , would we as a nation ...?
8 posted on 09/07/2013 8:55:00 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

It’s good if the stupid masses finally wake up and realize that elections have consequences.


9 posted on 09/07/2013 8:55:38 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Maybe these aren't stumbles but part of a master plan.


10 posted on 09/07/2013 8:55:49 AM PDT by McGruff (Strange times are these in which we live..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
By now it's impossible to avoid the conclusion that Obama is fervently anti-American. Which is what you might learn from his personal history, all the way from Mom the Stalinist, to his "mentor" Frank Davis the child pornographer, all the way to the "Reverend" Jerry Wright and the Alinsky Machine in Chicago The only incongruity in the quoted portion above is the qualification "by now." There were many of us who posted countless times before Obama was sworn in that his biography, his autobiography, his associations, and his writings as well is his public statements all compel the conclusion that he was a radical leftist, perhaps a Manchurian Muslim, and no friend of the United States of America.

One might take issue with the author's assessment that Obama is a bumbler, it might be rather that he has a very difficult needle to thread which is to consistently aid the enemies of America, for example, as the author points out, the Muslim brotherhood, while not appearing blatant about it. It is difficult to know exactly what Obama's hidden agenda is but he cannot act entirely as a free agent even among his most trusted White House intimates and certainly not with such public figures as John Kerry or Chuck Hagel. That is not to say that these men share our agenda but it is to say that they would certainly react to any overt act of treason they observed in Obama. At least Obama cannot be certain that they would fail to react.

Finally, it is well to remember that Obama is a radical leftist and that is an animal very different from a leftist like Jimmy Carter. Obama is not Jimmy Carter on steroids. Obama is an entirely different kind of leftist, one who aggressively seeks to diminish America and remove it as the principal obstacle to one world socialism (or a worldwide caliphate if you are in that camp). These aggressive leftists, think Trotsky, chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin are to a man indifferent to human suffering and quite willing to order an effusion of blood to advance their own power. I do not believe for a minute that Obama will shrink from waging war to advance his agenda. I think his problem is to find an inflection point which the public will accept and which advances a cause which the public, if aware of its real purpose, would oppose bitterly.


11 posted on 09/07/2013 8:58:36 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

...was Clinton’s missed opportunities to get UBL good for the US?
... was Carter’s diplomacy good for the hostages held for 444 days?
... was Johnson’s micro-managing the Viet Nam War from the WH good for the military?
... was Hillary’s denial of more security good for the Benghazi embassy?
...was Odungo’s Dereliction of Duty good for the people who died on September 11th 2012

..it’s best if the little muslim boy king plays golf for the next three years, preferably overseas with minimum security.


12 posted on 09/07/2013 8:59:47 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

13 posted on 09/07/2013 9:11:56 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

BTTT


14 posted on 09/07/2013 9:12:08 AM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

http://shoebat.com/2013/08/27/evidence-syrian-rebels-used-chemical-weapons-not-assad/


16 posted on 09/07/2013 9:14:51 AM PDT by 353FMG ( I do not say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Nothing good will come from this. Either he backs down from his red line, and looks like an even bigger cream puff to our enemies, who are then encouraged to make even bolder moves against us. Or he attacks, risking the lives of American troops, risking an full-blown shooting match with the Russkies, and possibly activating sleeper cells who are already in the USA (thanks to permissive immigration and wide-open borders), and we wind up with Boston and 9-11 x 100...or more.

Also, while our attention is diverted, the deadline to defund Obamacare will quietly pass, and we will find ourselves irreversibly slipping downhill toward full-on Socialized medicine. Maybe so-called "comprehensive immigration reform" will also pass, along with punitive tax increases on firearms and ammo. Who knows what will happen with the Obammunist's latest distraction?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

19 posted on 09/07/2013 10:07:56 AM PDT by wku man (It's almost deer season, got your DEERGOGGLES on yet? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jexrnFq2fXY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Nothing that this dictator does is good for America. And I don’t think he gives a damn about the fates of his so-called wife and kids either. Thus is he truly dangerous.


20 posted on 09/07/2013 10:18:05 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
We've got the biggest economy and military in the world. These are dangerous times, but not for us. John Derbyshire on why both GOP and Democratic pols are raring to bomb Syria:

Why does the administration want to bomb Syria anyway? Journalist Daniel Greenfield voiced a common opinion, quote:

The message from the attacks won't be that America takes human rights atrocities seriously. Sudan, Rwanda and countless other genocides make a mockery of that. The message will be that the Saudis can still call in the United States Air Force and Navy to clear the way for their regional objectives.

If you substitute "the Israelis" for "the Saudis" in that, you have another popular explanation going round.

I wish I could be that cynical! In my opinion, these sheltered, narcissistic moralizers in our government actually do believe the flapdoodle about "human rights" and the "international community," at least when it relates to something they've seen on TV and are therefore emotionally engaged with.

These are children of the Civil Rights era, remember, taught from childhood that good people must go out and confront evil. They believe that's what they should do, even when evil is minding its own business in some obscure foreign nation of no concern to U.S. interests. And let's face it: This belief of theirs appeals to something old and deep in the collective psyche of the U.S.A. — the City on the Hill, the Hope of the World, the Arsenal of Democracy, ready to bear any burden, pay any price …

Meanwhile, chess grandmasters with cold eyes are sitting watching in Moscow, Tehran, Riyadh, Jerusalem, Peking.


22 posted on 09/07/2013 10:41:18 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

BFLR


25 posted on 09/07/2013 10:44:45 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

We have 3 1/2 years left with this guy. It’s going to feel like 10 years.


26 posted on 09/07/2013 11:37:01 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Obama is an historic President. He's America's first 'Dear Leader' President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Nice article and I agree. But where were the “great thinkers” five years ago BEFORE he was elected the first time?

Seriously.

We not-so-great non-thinkers already knew enough about Barry even then to suspect he is STRONGLY anti-American and an anti-white racist, lily-white mother notwithstanding, or lying naked on an ottoman.


30 posted on 09/07/2013 12:16:13 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Are Obama's Syrian Stumbles Good for America?

No. This clown is dragging us down on the world stage which is unforgiving.

It is Carter times two.

The next President is going to have a real mess on his hands. Hopefully they will be the kind who wants to clean it up rather then add to it.

33 posted on 09/07/2013 10:06:19 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Revenge is a dish best served with pinto beans and muffins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson