[nathanbedford]

By now it's impossible to avoid the conclusion that Obama is fervently anti-American. Which is what you might learn from his personal history, all the way from Mom the Stalinist, to his "mentor" Frank Davis the child pornographer, all the way to the "Reverend" Jerry Wright and the Alinsky Machine in Chicago The only incongruity in the quoted portion above is the qualification "by now." There were many of us who posted countless times before Obama was sworn in that his biography, his autobiography, his associations, and his writings as well is his public statements all compel the conclusion that he was a radical leftist, perhaps a Manchurian Muslim, and no friend of the United States of America.

One might take issue with the author's assessment that Obama is a bumbler, it might be rather that he has a very difficult needle to thread which is to consistently aid the enemies of America, for example, as the author points out, the Muslim brotherhood, while not appearing blatant about it. It is difficult to know exactly what Obama's hidden agenda is but he cannot act entirely as a free agent even among his most trusted White House intimates and certainly not with such public figures as John Kerry or Chuck Hagel. That is not to say that these men share our agenda but it is to say that they would certainly react to any overt act of treason they observed in Obama. At least Obama cannot be certain that they would fail to react.

Finally, it is well to remember that Obama is a radical leftist and that is an animal very different from a leftist like Jimmy Carter. Obama is not Jimmy Carter on steroids. Obama is an entirely different kind of leftist, one who aggressively seeks to diminish America and remove it as the principal obstacle to one world socialism (or a worldwide caliphate if you are in that camp). These aggressive leftists, think Trotsky, chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin are to a man indifferent to human suffering and quite willing to order an effusion of blood to advance their own power. I do not believe for a minute that Obama will shrink from waging war to advance his agenda. I think his problem is to find an inflection point which the public will accept and which advances a cause which the public, if aware of its real purpose, would oppose bitterly.

[Travis McGee]

Three brilliant paragraphs; they should be a column somewhere.

[Art in Idaho]

Well said, especially the third paragraph.

One can hope there are sane people in Congress and the Pentagon who are keeping a very close eye on Obama. Since Obama is the highest national security risk we've ever encountered, I hope the NSA is monitoring his every word and communication so when the time is right, the US Marshals show up. People in Washington D.C. are at a point where they have to choose sides - America or the Obama agenda.

One can also hope the nation will get on board with Article V and the Liberty Amendments and begin the process of restoring our Sacred Republic. We have a lot of work to do. .

[matt1234]

I think his problem is to find an inflection point which the public will accept and which advances a cause which the public, if aware of its real purpose, would oppose bitterly.

Reparations by another name might be such an inflection point.

[lapsus calami]

 

 

I think his problem is to find an inflection point which the public will accept and which advances a cause which the public, if aware of its real purpose, would oppose bitterly.

 

That's exactly what I've been seeing - the Regime has been fishing around for an adequate cover story that would have traction and have been coming up snake eyes. So far.

 

 

[nikos1121]

I disagree. THe man is a coward. He will attack no one. He will not defend our interests. He is a coward. He will sit back and watch us beaten.

He has no military sense. He is a coward. He has been smacked down by Putin, who will now be even more brazen withtime until our next president stands up to him.

I think this is Jimmy Carter presidency all over again.

The man is a coward.