Posted on 09/03/2013 7:37:59 AM PDT by Sopater
HIV and AIDS patients think they have a right to spread it
sexual intercourse particularly rape, results in microabrasions that can transfer HIV.
Breivik? I suspect he was a plant. The left was on the ropes.
What studies show Zero chance of infection from vaginal sex, globally?
As a general statement, it’s true.
Woman to man transmission of HIV from normal vaginal intercourse, and assuming no pre-existing injury or VD, is very very difficult.
As in, there are no confirmed cases in the USA.
Rape, however, is not normal vaginal intercourse, so the risk is presumably much higher due to lack of lubrication, etc.
The Queer Mafia hides this statistic to insure better funding.
“Woman-to-man transmission of HIV is not very common.”
I think that’s true, if vaginal. But if the rape was not vaginal (you get my drift), would it be more likely? Seems so, considering the issue of AIDS and gays is so common, and “vaginal” is definitely not possible for them.
That’s a good point ... and I don’t know the answer and would rather not research it.
This is not a global story so take your little cliche argument somewhere else. Keep believing a lie if you want.
I tried to help you out earlier, but you seem firmly in the nut column.
Men can’t get HIV from women.
*********************************
It’s about a 1:600 chance assuming you don’t have any open sores/wounds.
Now all you have is name calling? Go do some research and you will find there are no cases of males catching it from females in America. You sound like a lib, what next denier?
Pray for America to Wake Up
I'm not saying I'm for it, mind you. But it's statistically rare.
There was a campaign by homosexual groups a few years back to sell the idea that we had to devote the equivalent of the entire Pentagon budget (or whatever) to fighting AIDS—using the claim that AIDS "can happen to anybody," that is, including normal males. And when you looked at the stats, which came out a year or two later, it was clearly, bizarrely untrue. Okay, a lie. It's what they do best. I guess it's cute and puckish somehow.
Of course, previously, the same, petulant individuals were trying to get money for AIDS research on the grounds that it was a special, gay, victim thing.
But before that, the disease was called, in the epidemiology field, GRID—for "Gay-Related Immunological Disorder." That had sent the militant homosexuals into a frenzy that someone would dare oppress them by associating them with a disease so horrible it suggested the wrath of God.
Soon they adopted the disease (and the fund-raising potential) as their own—a dignifying tragedy that was somehow Society's fault. And AIDS became for them like the Ring for Gollum.
Today, with the "norming" of homosexuality into more institutions, the incidence of AIDS is skyrocketing again. (Among homosexuals.)
Really? I did not know that. I was always led to believe that if you have sex with someone who has HIV then you risk getting it yourself.
Only if you are a woman, IV user or homosexual. It is rare for women to get it vaginally.
thank you for clarifying that. My sister died of the disease; but, she got it through a transfusion of contaminated blood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.