Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High radiation readings found at Fukushima tanks (NEW LEAK)
Japan Today ^ | 09/01/13 | staff

Posted on 09/01/2013 7:10:12 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper

At the time of last week’s discovered leak the plant operator said the radioactivity of the puddles was around 100 millisieverts per hour.

Jiji news agency said the highest reading of 1,800 millisieverts per hour was found at one of the tanks, adding that exposure to that level for four hours would be fatal to humans. The other readings measured between 70 and 230 millisieverts, the agency added.

A TEPCO official said the operator could not rule out the possibility of new leaks of radioactive water at the four sites, the agency reported, adding that the operator had not noticed a decline in water levels inside the tanks.

(Excerpt) Read more at japantoday.com ...


TOPICS: Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fukushima; nuclear; nuclearpower; radiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-306 next last
To: ROCKLOBSTER
You'd be amazed at the number of power plants built on faults (North Anna in VA, for instance), or on an actively eroding coastline (Lusby, MD). There are others, and though people were told....they just don't listen.

That's where I discovered most 'hearings' are just a formality, the decision has been made and the hearing is just so they can say the hearing was xx hours long and yy people testified, and that they are going to do what they wanted to do anyway.

Most plants can be sited to avoid such hazards, it is just more expensive to do so.

61 posted on 09/01/2013 12:10:19 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Thanks :) Boy is that a good explanation.


62 posted on 09/01/2013 12:19:51 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Well, I think the siting has everything to do with the massive cooling needs, and lots of water. Often riverbeds contain fault lines. That’s why I was asking about direct radiation to electric conversion, and less heat.

I understand the US Navy has a pretty good record on nuclear safety. Don’t they have some older ships that are becoming obsolete?

I’ll bet a decommissioned carrier could power up a coastal city AND become a good self-sustaining tourist attraction.


63 posted on 09/01/2013 12:22:49 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

We don’t but I think you just gave Errant and Idea.....Work on that Buddy!....lol

As for the robotics, Errant. While Japan is leading the way in research and development they are woefully behind in production practicality.


64 posted on 09/01/2013 12:57:26 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper; machogirl
I'm TOO errant to manage a ping list. Besides, it's machogirl's idea! ;)

they are woefully behind in production practicality.

South Korea or even China come to mind with collaboration and Japanese design. The world needs to come together and fix this!

65 posted on 09/01/2013 4:11:11 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: houeto
You're welcome. Hope that answer wasn't too short. Basically, all of the reactors and pools start melting down, burning and possibility even going critical a time or two. There are a half dozen reactors in that location and numerous fuel storage pools as well. If the radiation gets too high, the area will have to be abandon and eventually the cooling pumps stop, then the meltdowns begin occurring.

It would be a tremendous catastrophe, not only for Japan, but the entire world.

66 posted on 09/01/2013 4:17:13 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
“...see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass...”

You wouldn't believe how many times I repeat that line to myself too, when things are just too crazy to believe.

Do you have a link to the video you mentioned?

Thanks,

67 posted on 09/01/2013 4:20:35 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Why couldn't they create a controlled EMP inside a containment vessel, a sort of shielded rotating cylinder, which has slots or windows in it that alternately "flashes" the radiation at a transducer/antenna?

A nuclear EMP is a geophysical effect on scale of the entire planet. Perhaps E1 components can be duplicated in a lab using a highly energetic gamma ray source; but far more energy could be recovered by not doing any of that :-)

68 posted on 09/01/2013 4:22:21 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Greysard
far more energy could be recovered by not doing any of that

But that's not going to happen again...is it?

69 posted on 09/01/2013 4:40:22 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Sorry so long in replying.
I am trying to find the actual radio broadcast link we listened to. Ran across show through luck—had never heard of him before, and his guest just kept us on the edge of our seats..(I misspelled his name-it’s Bob Tuskin-—not “Tusken”.) We were listening to it on Friday night, but I think it was a re-broadcast.

I will continue to try and find the link to the audio we heard. (wish my better half had bookmarked it.)

If I find it, I’ll send it to you thru Freepmail.


70 posted on 09/01/2013 6:44:49 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
lol, no problem... If you happen across it, would love to take a look.

Many thanks!

71 posted on 09/01/2013 6:47:33 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Errant

My better half is attempting to find the audio for me...

But, while we wait, I ran across this site:

Sunday, August 25, 2013
#Fukushima I Nuke Plant: RO Waste Water Tank That Leaked Had Been Moved from Another Area After Ground Sank

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2013/08/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-ro-waste-water.html

I remember the guest (the one with the nuclear background) mentioning something about how they had “lost” some of the rods...LOST! I think that’s when our blood pressure went up.

(I hope I can send you the link to the audio soon.)


72 posted on 09/01/2013 7:01:54 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Errant
Hope that answer wasn't too short.

It was shorter than I had hoped. Still appreciated though.

Basically, all of the reactors and pools start melting down, burning and possibility even going critical a time or two.

I do not understand what "GOING CRITICAL" means. That's why I am asking.

Thank you in advance for your reply.

73 posted on 09/01/2013 7:38:41 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Errant

lol on the pun of your screen name. i’ve never, ever, made a pint list in my 12 years here. in honor of Barry, i will vote Present.


74 posted on 09/01/2013 8:16:14 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: houeto

To rescue Errant here....lol

What could theoretically happen is there is a real possibility that what is contained in Fukushima could go live again. Meaning an uncontrolled Nuclear Reaction.

That possibility increases with their evident lack of radiation containment.


75 posted on 09/01/2013 8:29:50 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

If you gin up a ping list, I’d like to be on it, even thought I really don’t want to be on it. This is bad.


76 posted on 09/01/2013 8:53:53 PM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: machogirl; Errant

This was my facebook post a few minutes ago....so MachoGirl it’s time for you to have your first List....lol

Okay...a Fukushima update. Been a few years....lol

Last week you all might have read of the storage tank leaking on property that released contaminated fluids into the ground water. While bad the water was not extremely radioactive.

Today however TEPCO the owner of the now cursed Diiachi reactor complex reported a new radiation leak that is extreme. 1800 milisieverts am hour. Such a reading produces death within four hours.

Here’s the issue though. If the contamination becomes so risky as it would be impossible for TEPCO to send in workers then something very very bad could occur.

Three of the reactors that were damaged from the earthquake and tsunami must be hand cooled with water. That water must be exchanged then stored and it is these storage tanks that have overwhelmed the property. The simply have run out of room for them. The tank construction was sent out to bid so the contract is the cheapest of those that submitted a proposal. So they leak and they leak a lot.

So here’s the danger for the UNITED STATES.....

The reactors if not maintained will overheat and become exposed. So not only is there a real possibility now of what is called the CHINA SYNDROME where by the reactors completely melt, but there is enough heat contained in at least two to start an uncontrolled nuclear reaction.

Despite what is happening in the Middle East this issue must now be brought to everyone’s conscience and we now must demand IAEA involvement.


77 posted on 09/01/2013 9:11:20 PM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper
The tank construction was sent out to bid so the contract is the cheapest of those that submitted a proposal. So they leak and they leak a lot.

That item is asinine, and obviously the main cause of the current problem.

Stupid stupid stupid.

Who's the Einstein proudly wearing this decision?

78 posted on 09/02/2013 6:47:57 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Here ya go a little tidbit from the Article but I encourage you to read the entire piece....!

Tepco spokeswoman Mayumi Yoshida said a joint venture of Taisei, Shimzu and Hazama Ando won the first contract to build storage tanks at Fukushima in April 2011. She declined to say whether the contractors built the tank that began to leak. Tepco has not identified the cause of the leak, and has consistently declined to give details on the value of contracts it has awarded or winning bidders, citing a need to protect “corporate secrets”. The Fukushima decommissioning is projected to cost at least $11 billion and take at least 30 years to complete.

Taisei, which built the structure around Japan’s newest reactor at Tomari in Hokkaido in 2009, was heavily involved in the construction of the Fukushima tanks, according to three people involved, who asked not to be named. Workers and engineers at Fukushima have been put on an “emergency” footing to work on the storage tanks this week, they said.

Shimizu, which also has experience in building nuclear plants in Japan, had technology needed to build the bolted tanks and brought in experts, one of the sources said.

Taisei said it could not comment on individual client projects. Shimizu and Hazama Ando decline

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/23/japan-fukushima-endgame-idUSL2N0GN0M920130823


79 posted on 09/02/2013 8:00:15 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper ("If you can't ride two horses at once, you probably shouldn't be in the circus" - SP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper

A well written concise summation! :)


80 posted on 09/02/2013 8:01:22 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson