Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High radiation readings found at Fukushima tanks (NEW LEAK)
Japan Today ^ | 09/01/13 | staff

Posted on 09/01/2013 7:10:12 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper

At the time of last week’s discovered leak the plant operator said the radioactivity of the puddles was around 100 millisieverts per hour.

Jiji news agency said the highest reading of 1,800 millisieverts per hour was found at one of the tanks, adding that exposure to that level for four hours would be fatal to humans. The other readings measured between 70 and 230 millisieverts, the agency added.

A TEPCO official said the operator could not rule out the possibility of new leaks of radioactive water at the four sites, the agency reported, adding that the operator had not noticed a decline in water levels inside the tanks.

(Excerpt) Read more at japantoday.com ...


TOPICS: Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fukushima; nuclear; nuclearpower; radiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-306 next last
To: Errant

I think I’ve read 666,000 spent rods.

I really am thinking of getting a geiger counter.


21 posted on 09/01/2013 8:06:38 AM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper

How much water is there?

What is the half-life of the material?


22 posted on 09/01/2013 8:06:55 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant
I don't think anyone knows how bad it could get if the workers are forced offsite and unable to keep the cooling going.

I thought Japan was the premier developer in robotics. What have they done in that regard?

23 posted on 09/01/2013 8:09:58 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: txhurl; djf
Between Fukushima and Obama trying to start WWIII, it might not be a bad idea. If do get one, go for those that also read alpha particles. They are more expensive, but better for checking for food contamination which could be important in the long run.

Many on here know much more about them than I.

24 posted on 09/01/2013 8:14:52 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Even hardened electronics have issues in that kind of a high radiation environment. Seems their efforts are mostly geared toward containment, and I’m sure they know much more than me, but I’d look at remotely controlled demolition and removal/distribution, while the ability to do so still exists.


25 posted on 09/01/2013 8:22:35 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Is NERC even taking water samples and publishing them?


26 posted on 09/01/2013 8:28:07 AM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: txhurl; winoneforthegipper

I don’t know. Most everything I’ve seen is data from the power company in Becquerels and hard for most everyone to convert to better understood Sieverts - for a reason, I assume.


27 posted on 09/01/2013 8:32:33 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Having watched the Deepwater Horizon activities live, it seems they could do certain remote control actions with radio or cable controlled normal equipment...like Bobcats and other tractors fitted with specialized gripping equipment.

I’m sure there are overhead cranes etc, and they probably have the best engineers in the world there working on it, but why is nothing happening?

If ever there were a serious threat to the environment...this is it.


28 posted on 09/01/2013 8:33:42 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Yep, I don't have an answer, and time is running out...

In the same regard, why are we trying to blow ourselves up over the ME?

It's like we've lost the ability to work together and put our differences aside in order to accomplish a common good, lately.

"...see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass..."

29 posted on 09/01/2013 8:41:52 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Having watched the Deepwater Horizon activities live...

Btw, wasn't that something! The thread is still here on FR, I'm sure. We never did learn who the heroes behind the controls were.

30 posted on 09/01/2013 8:43:54 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper; flaglady47; mickie; seekthetruth; Chigirl 26; hoosiermama; Maine Mariner
Where is Algore, the Sierra Club and all the usual globull-warming shills on this?

Sitting in the counting-house counting all their carbon footprint money?

Leni

31 posted on 09/01/2013 8:48:50 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Errant
We never did learn who the heroes behind the controls were.

By the way they handled that gear (which already existed) it appeared they were old hands at it.

Maybe they do it every day...somewhere else.

32 posted on 09/01/2013 8:53:41 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

What amazed me, when they were placing the control head on, and the oil was gushing everywhere blinding the cameras, the ROVs were still perfectly able to remain on station. Maybe they also have some kind of sonar imaging or other stabilization method?


33 posted on 09/01/2013 9:06:02 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Errant
The DWH gear was "fly by wire" as opposed to wireless, since radio doesn't work well under water.

Regarding what you said about "hardened electronics":

I'm not sure if there is a lot of electromagnetic wave activity around such intense radiation (if so, I always wondered why they bothered to make steam instead of harnessing the radiation to make power) or if the radiation actually damages the chips etc by changing their atomic structure.

It's pretty likely that "hardening" would probably entail quite a bit of lead shielding in the form of cases for the controls, and maybe the cable too.

If cables are not needed, that would make life a lot simpler for the engineers.

34 posted on 09/01/2013 9:18:10 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
or if the radiation actually damages the chips etc by changing their atomic structure

It works something like that. Radiation hardening: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hardening.

35 posted on 09/01/2013 9:22:31 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Errant

If the Mythbusters can drive a Plymouth Fury by remote control, and considering the DWH folks, these world class engineers should be able to remotely be in there to git-er done.

Maybe the Japanese aren’t allowing Americans and other foreigners in there to help.


36 posted on 09/01/2013 9:26:22 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
I'm not sure if there is a lot of electromagnetic wave activity around such intense radiation

γ radiation is high frequency photons, or radio waves above 10 exahertz (1019 Hz.) So there is a lot of EM waves around a γ source.

or if the radiation actually damages the chips etc by changing their atomic structure.

Yes. Ionizing radiation is directly affecting atoms, and it causes electronics to fail. Per Wikipedia:

Environments with high levels of ionizing radiation create special design challenges. A single charged particle can knock thousands of electrons loose, causing electronic noise and signal spikes. In the case of digital circuits, this can cause results which are inaccurate or unintelligible.

37 posted on 09/01/2013 9:33:38 AM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Greysard
Hmmm...

In that case (back to my musing)....Why don't they just put an "antenna" around a radioactive source and pull current out of it, instead of messing around with an archaic boiler and steam-punk engine?

ie convert radiation directly to current.

38 posted on 09/01/2013 9:41:08 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
The Japanese are ahead or equal with robotics. My guess would be the age old enemies: bureaucracy and fear. What's needed is something massive in size. Controlling and collecting dust will be a huge issue during demolition along with a number of other technologies needed to be developed specifically for this job.

Reagan used to offer up the scenario of aliens attacking as a reason to unite the world. Here we have an actual threat to us all and still can't unite to solve it. We have to go create even more danger. Are we stupid or what?

39 posted on 09/01/2013 9:55:03 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Why don't they just put an "antenna" around a radioactive source and pull current out of it, instead of messing around with an archaic boiler and steam-punk engine?

They kinda do. However what is the wavelength of 10 exahertz? It is 1.18 microinches. That's twice the length of the antenna that you need. Care to build one or two for me, along with rectifier diodes? :-)

This is subatomic scale, and this is why the radiation can affect atoms. Electrons themselves are antennas for the energy. A single atom of Hydrogen (one proton, one electron) has diameter of 2 microinches. The smallest atom is larger than the wavelength of gamma radiation!

You still can convert energy of gamma radiation into thermal energy. But it's about the same as boiling a cup of tea by harvesting kinetic energy from a hail of bullets on a battlefield. Each gamma photon is so destructive that you will be awash in radioactive products of collisions. Sure, eventually they all decay into something more or less stable, and thermal energy will be released. But it will be a dirty business, not unlike what happens inside of a nuclear reactor.

40 posted on 09/01/2013 9:58:07 AM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson