Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats attempting to revive push to tax the heck out of guns and ammunition
Hot Air ^ | August 27, 2013 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 08/27/2013 1:31:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve never been a fan of any form of sin taxes, so called because our august lawmakers deem a particular behavior a vice and then try to ramp up the taxes on its perpetrators to supposedly pay for the cost of the behavior on society at large, but the idea that law-abiding, gun-owning citizens need to pay for the sins of what are overwhelmingly not law-abiding and probably not tax-paying criminals… really just takes the cake of stupid.

But no way is that stopping a couple of Congressional Democrats from fixing to propose even steeper taxes on the lawful purchasers of handguns and ammunition and supposedly funnel the revenue to ‘gun violence prevention.’ Via Fox News:

Called the “Gun Violence Prevention and Safe Communities Act,” the bill sponsored by William Pascrell, D-N.J., and Danny Davis, D-Ill., would nearly double the current 11 percent tax on handguns, while raising the levy on bullets and cartridges from 11 percent to 50 percent. …

The lawmakers say the bill would generate $600 million per year, which would be used to fund law-enforcement and gun violence prevention. …

The bill would also increase the transfer tax on all weapons (except antique guns) covered under the National Firearms Act (which excludes most common guns) from $200 to $500 and index to inflation and increase the transfer tax for any other weapon from $5 to $100. …

“This legislation is a pro-active approach to reducing gun violence by using proven preventive programs which have been starved for funds until now,” Davis said. “As part of a comprehensive, multidimensional strategy to reduce gun violence, this legislation closes major loopholes in tax law and lays out an equitable, long term, sustainable strategy to provide the requisite resources.”

Yes, by all means, let’s add yet another regressive barrier to home- and self-defense, so that even more people will be completely dependent on the police for protection, in order to help offset the costs of law enforcement! …Anyone? Anyone?

It’s no surprise that Davis represents a portion of Chicago, whose own “long term, sustainable strategy to provide the requisite resources” for violence prevention has been a direct cause of skyrocketing murder rates but still seems to insist for more gun control as the answer.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; congress; democrats; guncontrol; secondamendment; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...really just takes the cake of stupid.”

Aside from being both unconstitutional and, therefore, illegal.

But when has the constitution ever mattered to our congressional betters?


21 posted on 08/27/2013 2:07:50 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not enough Democrats to get it even close.


22 posted on 08/27/2013 2:21:45 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Thy Kingdom come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"The lawmakers say the bill would generate $600 million per year, which would be used to fund law-enforcement and gun violence prevention."

ROFL!!!! Where have we heard bullshit like this before? (think - Tobacco taxes)

23 posted on 08/27/2013 2:26:29 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Democrats pushed the poll tax once upon a time too.


24 posted on 08/27/2013 2:30:14 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In the past it worked to defeat behavioral modification taxation by calling it “sin taxes.” This is fundalmentalist fanatics imposing their morals on the public. It is anti-American and anti-Constitutional to do that according to the communists (DNC).

Most ministers/churches are for liberalism’s sin taxes. Do an ad campaign with ministers and Christians all saying taxes on tabacco and guns as behavioral control, etc is holy. Plenty of left wing ministers, Rabbis and Imans would get their mugs on the camera if they thought it was supporting a liberal cause. Devil weed!

Devil butt action is the biggest health hazard and expense around. Tax butt f’ ing if sin tax is really for health care saving and not for moral high ground not for religious fanitics.


25 posted on 08/27/2013 2:44:22 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
Bought some a week ago on line at Midway.

By some, do you mean more than 100 rounds?

When it is available we are limited to one box, sometimes they have a brick of 325, or 500, but no CCI stuff.

26 posted on 08/27/2013 3:40:18 PM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Very regressive, indeed. But they’re doing this to health care under the common folk radar, so action is needed.


27 posted on 08/27/2013 4:03:39 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Only Five Days until
September.

Please donate today.

28 posted on 08/27/2013 4:20:55 PM PDT by RedMDer (http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Then we tax speech. Right?


29 posted on 08/27/2013 4:54:51 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

.10 to .14 cents/round if you can find any in Hoosierland.


30 posted on 08/27/2013 5:01:50 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Tax out of buying them so they can purchase them and give them to the various branches of the Imperial Federal Government who have no need for weapons or ammo. Why the IRS or NASA or CDC needs guns and ammo to do their jobs is beyond me. I think it is building Obama’s private army within the government.


31 posted on 08/27/2013 5:08:50 PM PDT by RetiredArmy ("As in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of Man." Come Quickly LORD Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Got a box of 375 rounds, 22LR, CCI MiniMag (copper plated hollow points) for $23.99.


32 posted on 08/27/2013 5:15:49 PM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Democrats attempting to revive push to tax the heck out of guns and ammunition

This would be a clear infingement of the right to keep and bear arms, just like if Republicans attempted to impose oppressive taxes on newspapers it would be an infringement of the right to freedom of speech.

33 posted on 08/27/2013 5:23:35 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


34 posted on 08/27/2013 5:26:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I aim to raise a million plus for Gov. Palin. What'll you do?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

not surprised its their modern day version of a poll tax.


35 posted on 08/27/2013 6:50:05 PM PDT by Cubs Fan (EVERYTHING IS RACISM!!! except hating whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

For me, this is the Tea Act.


36 posted on 08/27/2013 7:02:25 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is it frying pan time again?


37 posted on 08/27/2013 7:54:29 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

I propose it to be a sin tax to be a liberal democrat...

The revenue generated could be used to repay all the legal fees for conservative groups trying to get their 501c3 staus...


38 posted on 08/27/2013 7:58:22 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Retrograde genocide??? (snicker)

Brilliant!!! ;-)


39 posted on 08/27/2013 8:02:48 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

They’d end up plucking that one hair anyway...


40 posted on 08/27/2013 8:04:22 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson