Why? For as weak-kneed and wobbly as the GOP candidate for President is, I have a hard time believing he would be as radical as Obama.
Doing the job full steam.
...John McCain would like to beg your pardon here...
They’ll find her mummified corpse sitting in the chair around 2020.
Hey, when did she pass on? You mean we’ve been playing weekend at Bernie’s this whole time?
When we have to be grateful that Ginsburg is interpreting the Constitution, you know how little hope remains for this country.
"could" being the operable would.
"is remotely possible" being a more accurate replacement.
That’s good news.
Ruthie is brain dead, isn’t she? Poor homely, bird-faced leftist.
In that case it’s a good thing she’s a place holder so that her scrawny backside can be replaced with a Constitutional Conservative before it’s too damned late!
Yes! You go Ginsburg! Stay healthy.
Good. Lord knows what hussein would replace her with.
I believe she was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. She must be getting excellent medical care. I’d like to know the names of her doctors & what treatment she has received.
Given her dx, I’m amazed that she can continue to work.
I concur. This is good news.
Why should this former ACLU lawyer with a 100% Marxist voting record retire? Obama is just waiting for one of the conservatives to die so he can appoint a Marxist, giving him a majority. The Leftists never have to waver from their judicial agenda, doncha knows, because it is the side the media is on.
The US Senate approved Ginsburg by a 96-3 vote despite her extreme left wing record and her refusal to answer a number of questions during her confirmation hearings. Ginsburg’s easy confirmation came only 6 years after the defeat of Robert Bork’s nomination to the court. Instead of killing the Ginsberg nomination in retaliation for the Democrat behavior on the Bork and Thomas nominations, the Republicans decided to confirm President Bill Clinton’s choice without a clash over ideology.
History has shown how this “bipartisan” outreach has been rewarded.
She is probably petrified about who her replacement could be.
I am glad she is staying for that reason
“For as weak-kneed and wobbly as the GOP candidate for President is, I have a hard time believing he would be as radical as Obama.”
I can’t believe that people here are still spouting this type of nonsense concerning the Republican leadership, they are NOT weak kneed and wobbly for God’s sake, they are part of the SAME agenda, they want the exact same things as the fascists, as in they are fascists too.........
Now about Ruth, she once wrote a paper advocating the age of consent for sex between adults and minors be lowered to I think it was 11 or 12.
Me, I hope she dies a horrible slow painful death.
The Supreme Court should have a fifteen year term limit the post isn’t a life time free ride.
To many of them become pals with long term hacks and end up passing insane laws.
That is about the best any Constitution-loving American can hope for...
Democrat Presidents always appoint dyed-in-the-wool lifelong Democrats, with a spotless record of pro-abortion activism. During the vetting process, they are asked point-blank what their position is on abortion, etc.
Republicans appoint people who have filled a series of positions and remained “respectable.”
Democrats in the Senate apply a number of litmus tests—such as a history of pro-abortion activism.
Republicans in the Senate will vote for any nominee who has never been convicted of a felony.
Democrat nominees never “disappoint” their President. They are reliably Socialist and pro-abortion.
When more than half of Republican appointees turn out to be Socialist and pro-abortion, Republicans wring their hands and wonder why.
We need to get Columbia University to offer her the job of President of the University and the Vice President job to Sotomayer, Assistant Vice President Job to Kagan.