Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's race card
Politico ^ | 8-15-13 | Rich Lowrey

Posted on 08/15/2013 7:35:55 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

Anyone who doubts that Hillary Clinton is already in fine fighting trim for a presidential run should consider her speech this week to the American Bar Association in San Francisco.

She assailed an alleged “assault on voting rights.” She took aim at the Supreme Court’s recent decision striking down a portion of the Voting Rights Act and excoriated states that have recently tightened their voting laws. She declared that “anyone who says that racial discrimination is no longer a problem in American elections must not be paying attention.”

Madam Secretary hasn’t missed a beat. She knows that the calling card of Democrats in the Barack Obama era is a polarizing politics that seeks to fire up minority voters by stirring fears of fire hoses and police dogs. Its basic vocabulary is imputations of racism; its evidentiary standard is low and dishonest; and its ethic is whatever works — so long as its stirs fear, anger, and resentment.

Get ready for Hope and Change 2.0.

The latest target is the state of North Carolina, which is accused of soiling itself with a new voter ID law, among other changes in its election laws. “The Decline of North Carolina” harrumphs the New York Times. “North Carolina’s Attack on Voting Rights” says the Daily Beast. The state is supposedly part of a tide of disenfranchisement victimizing minority voters in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2016election; alinskytactics; clinton; corruption; democratcorruption; democratplantation; democrats; democravoterfraud; electionfraud; elections; fraud; hillary; minorityvoters; northcarolina; racecard; victimization; voterid

1 posted on 08/15/2013 7:35:55 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

She is absolutely running in 2016. No doubt in my mind whatsoever.


2 posted on 08/15/2013 7:37:33 AM PDT by ScottinVA (If you don't care about Antonio Santiago, sure as hell don't whine about Trayvon Martin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

She knows that black Democrats now feel they OWN the office of POTUS, and she will have a real battle on her hands convincing her party to go back to nominating white people.


3 posted on 08/15/2013 7:42:04 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Remember when Hillary was out jive talkin’ on the campaign trail in 2008?

One of the most pathetic things I ever saw in politics.


4 posted on 08/15/2013 7:43:27 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Remember when photos of speeches showed the speaker looking at the audience? Now it’s teleprompters only.

They might as well run a video loop - it would be a lot cheaper as well.


5 posted on 08/15/2013 7:44:02 AM PDT by relictele (A community vigilant in enforcing economic, racial and social equality. It was called Jonestown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

6 posted on 08/15/2013 7:45:12 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

How can the Dems keep up this patently absurd claim that only black people don’t have any identification?


7 posted on 08/15/2013 7:46:28 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be what you might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

NO, the ‘Rats will run her and say that any criticism of her (abysmal) record is sexist.

They are diabolical — and know that the public will sucker for this next twist on the old canard.


8 posted on 08/15/2013 7:48:35 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

LOVE your graphic!


9 posted on 08/15/2013 7:50:25 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

10 posted on 08/15/2013 7:56:41 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Who ARE these people who can not produce a valid ID?

11 posted on 08/15/2013 7:59:20 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Democrats can’t win an honest election it’s why they fight so hard for anti photo ID’s.


12 posted on 08/15/2013 8:50:33 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“She knows that black Democrats now feel they OWN the office of POTUS . . . “

Right On, and now it’s time for a black man who was down for the fight - a real black man - to become POTUS.

Neal Cavuto agrees with me that Hitlery will not be the demorat nominee. The Clintons have always evaded controversy by deriding it as old news.

Irony of ironies, Hitlery will lose the nomination, because she is Old News. Demorats love fresh, pristine, utopian, savior of the day candidates.

They will run like lemmings to someone new, promising, and charismatic. You heard it here first. I’m predicting a huge comeback by Al Green (SC Senate candidate) and his demorat cadre of action figures.


13 posted on 08/15/2013 8:58:19 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

She said: “I ain’t in no way tarred” or something close to that.


14 posted on 08/15/2013 9:09:06 AM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

fity percent of em are crimnulls from the hood...the other fifty percent are from south of...OUR Border ?


15 posted on 08/15/2013 9:35:46 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (This Message NOT Approved By The N.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; ScottinVA; Buckeye McFrog; BenLurkin

She Who Must Not Be Named is the most ruthless woman ever to stalk the halls of power.

Never forget that she is a student of Saul Alinsky. She has used the Rules for Radicals extensively in clawing her way to the top.

Her ultimate goal has always been the Oval Office. Her boast of being “Co-President” was not idle hubris. When her legal career was thwarted after Watergate, she married into power, using William the Impeached as a stepping stone.

She then used the NY Senate seat as another springboard to power but was foiled again, this time by the Chicago Machine, who had already chosen Odinga to carry the party banner.

Examine her personality. She has the need to dominate. It’s not enough that her subjects obey her commands; they must be forced to obey against their will, or the needed gratification is not derived.

She is a compulsive liar. She is a consummate fraud. She is most likely a lesbian with a deep-seeded hatred of the men who, in her mind, deny her her rightful place in history. Never again must she be allowed to approach the levers of authority, for that day will spell the doom of the Republic.


16 posted on 08/15/2013 9:44:43 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Why isn’t she rotting away in federal penitentiary?


17 posted on 08/15/2013 9:46:10 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Goodbye America. Glad the majority of my years were spent during the good days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
aint she just dripping with self loathing and "white" guilt!


18 posted on 08/15/2013 9:48:55 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (This Message NOT Approved By The N.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Examine her personality. She has the need to dominate. It’s not enough that her subjects obey her commands; they must be forced to obey against their will, or the needed gratification is not derived.

And anyone unfortunate enough to be in her way will not only be removed, but be the subject of her relentless attempts to destroy them. Billy Dale, the former director of the White House Travel Office will attest to that. It wasn't enough for Hitlery to simply fire Dale and install Harry Thomasen... no.. she sought to destroy Dale's reputation by siccing the IRS and the FBI on him with phony charges.

Hitlery is an evil, remorseless bitch.

19 posted on 08/15/2013 11:53:09 AM PDT by ScottinVA (If you don't care about Antonio Santiago, sure as hell don't whine about Trayvon Martin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks afraidfortherepublic.

Racism and high blood pressure link suggested in research in black patients
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3054998/posts


20 posted on 08/16/2013 4:47:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson