Posted on 08/10/2013 10:37:32 PM PDT by OL Hickory
08/08/2013-MOTION REINSTATE AND CONTINUANCE AGAINST ABOVE NAME DEFENDANT GEORGE ZIMMERMAN
(Excerpt) Read more at seminoleclerk.org ...
Could be a civil trial.
He doesn’t have any money, so there’s nothing to gain in terms of monetary.
The police did not arrest Zimmerman because after they investigated this, THOROUGHLY, they decided that they lacked probable cause.
The police were overruled by a political racist pandering political system and Zimmerman was forced to go to trial anyway.
Perhaps Zimmerman's attorneys want to get a LEGAL RULING showing that there was NO PROBABLE CAUSE to arrest Zimmerman. The lawyers would naturally want to take this case out of the trial jurisdiction because they believe the legal personnel showed obvious bias against Zimmerman.
If they can get a legal ruling showing that there was no probable cause to arrest him, then that may remove a major impediment to filing lawsuits against the people who forced this to trial, in other words, denying them "qualified immunity," because a reasonable person with the same qualifications and experience would not have done this to Zimmerman. Just a guess, but it could be very very bad news personally for those who prosecuted him if it is ruled that there was no probable cause for arrest.
No, this is the criminal docket.
No, specifically say ‘reinstate the charge’
Detailed Information for Case 592012CF001083A
“MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE
...
07/13/2013 JDNG JUDGMENT OF NOT GUILTY
07/13/2013 VRFN VERDICT FORM NOT GUILTY-REDACT”
All I need to see. This case is closed.
Nice guess, but probably not.
Zimmerman’s lawyers filed all documents on his web site. There is nothing there. So unlikely from his side.
“Answer must be stated in the form of a ques-”
Suddenly, a giant robot fist pummels Trebeks smug mug into the set pieces..
I can’t see any prosecutor launching a second trial, even if he’s found some charge the original prosecutor choose not to follow.
My guess is that some person has applied to retry the case. I don’t know if the courts will accept such an action.
I don’t you can do that.
That’s what it looks like. Some third party probably filed this.
I’m drunk so I have no idea
Oh yes! When does that episode go to air....?
It won’t, they had too decant yet another clone Trebek.
Then they refilmed the scene without the robots.
You could say that Alex was in...
*sunglasses on*
...Jeopardy.
Also unlikely you’d see an amicus filing from his side.
Some lawyer thinks he can get some money out of the parents. If filed by a lawyer he can be disbarred. If not filed by a lawyer hell be laughed out of court.
It means someone’s been swigging Purple Drank.
Here is the Affidavit of Probable Cause. I believe it was filed in April 2012. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/118653372/State-of-Florida-v-George-Zimmerman-—Affidavit-of-Probable-Cause .
I believe this is a motion by Zimmerman’s attorneys to reinstate a hearing regarding this affidavit, in light of the fact that we now know they lied in the sworn affidavit.
I hope you’re right. Crump & Co have issued a bunch of lies that need to be destroyed.
I hope you’re right. Crump & Co have issued a bunch of lies that need to be destroyed.
Most likely, the year was entered wrong by the clerk (2013 instead of 2012) and the filings are in regard to earlier phases of the case against Zimmerman. I have read through enough court files (including some in the Seminole County courthouse) to have seen similar errors before.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.