Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich: I Side With Rand Paul and Ted Cruz
Newsmax ^ | Thursday, 01 Aug 2013 02:10 PM

Posted on 08/01/2013 6:10:07 PM PDT by drewh

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Thursday that he sides with Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz because they are not afraid to ask important questions, and it is disheartening to watch establishment Republicans like Gov. Chris Christie "grow hysterical."

"I consistently have been on the side of having the courage that Rand Paul and Ted Cruz have and I think it's sad to watch the establishment grow hysterical, but frankly they're hysterical because they have no answers," Gingrich said while appearing on "The Laura Ingraham Show," Politico reports.

Gingrich was on Ingraham's show to offer his opinion on the current debate going on between Paul and the New Jersey governor, which began when Christie said the libertarian ideas promoted by the Kentucky Republican were "dangerous" because of his isolationist views on national security and his opposition to the NSA's surveillance program.

Gingrich said that even though he did support the wars in Afghanistan and in Iraq, Republicans need to admit that "the way they were executed failed, and maybe we should have known better, those of us that supported them. … Republicans have a real obligation to ask themselves the question: Aren't there some pretty painful lessons to learn from the last 10 or 12 years? Don't we have to confront the reality that this didn't work as a strategy?"

The GOP infighting is a sign of the discomfort the establishment has with the power that Paul and Cruz, of Texas, have gained in recent months, Gingrich argued. "Trust me, Chris Christie is only the first sign," he said.

Gingrich said established Republicans will grow "more hysterical" as Paul and Cruz become "more powerful."

"They will gain strength as it's obvious that they are among the few people willing to raise the right questions," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: Illinois; US: Kentucky; US: New Jersey; US: Ohio; US: South Carolina; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; afghanistan; chrischristie; florida; georgia; globalwarming; highpraiseindeed; illinois; iran; iraq; kentucky; lauraingraham; newjersey; newtgingrich; ohio; politico; randsconcerntrolls; southcarolina; tedcruz; texas; thekycandidate; thisweeksflipflop; ultimaterino; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: cookcounty

hear, hear


21 posted on 08/01/2013 7:22:03 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock
Circular firing squad, anybody??

Apparently, those don't work. The old political retreads keep sticking their heads up every few years.
22 posted on 08/01/2013 7:23:47 PM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Words mean things. Or in the case of #3, commercials mean things. And in Gingrich’s case, not “conservative” things.


23 posted on 08/01/2013 7:24:00 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

He’s also tried running for office. Egad. Let him stay in the tank.


24 posted on 08/01/2013 7:25:45 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

I do, too.

Nothing he is saying in this article is untrue. Pretty interesting that folks would down him for promoting two of our best conservative voices.


25 posted on 08/01/2013 7:29:57 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Newt Gingrich: I Side With Rand Paul and Ted Cruz

I'm going say something very bold, or at least very different from most the comments that I see on this thread.

I side with Newt's comment about Rand and Cruz versus Christie.

26 posted on 08/01/2013 7:31:13 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie
Nothing he is saying in this article is untrue. Pretty interesting that folks would down him for promoting two of our best conservative voices.

They are not quit downing him for promoting today's two best conservative voices.

But they are certainly ignoring the comment aren't they.

27 posted on 08/01/2013 7:35:24 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I stand with Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Newt Gingrich.


28 posted on 08/01/2013 7:54:46 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Newt needs to dump on Juan and Boner. It’d be more useful.


29 posted on 08/01/2013 7:56:06 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

If Newt Gingrich was the nominee last year, whether he won or not, at least he would have fought and fought hard. Unlike the poser who was too afraid to say anything too controversial.


30 posted on 08/01/2013 7:59:18 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I side with FreeReign who sides with Newt who sides with Rand and Cruz vs. Christie.


31 posted on 08/01/2013 8:11:18 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/newt-gingrich-john-mccain-attacks-on-rand-paul-sad-88617.html

I can’t say that this is a harsh slap down..but it isn’t a pat on the head. He sort of said McCain is washed up.

There is no love lost between Gingrich and Boehner.


32 posted on 08/01/2013 8:15:01 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

I don’t think we had a shot of winning last year...but I would have paid good money to see Newt debate The Won and put the slanted mediators in their respective places.


33 posted on 08/01/2013 8:22:54 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

We didn’t go to war against Iraq or Afghanistan. We went to war against terror. Anyone paying even a little bit of attention would have known it’s a “war” that can’t be won.


34 posted on 08/01/2013 8:28:42 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Let me add it’s a war we can’t win because we do what has to be done to win.

Newt jumping on the bandwagon reminds me of Jim Maddox when he was running against Ann Richards for governor. Ross Perot was running strong so Jim went around telling people “I’m like Ross Perot”. I swear. He said it to me.


35 posted on 08/01/2013 8:30:29 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie
Nothing he is saying in this article is untrue. Pretty interesting that folks would down him for promoting two of our best conservative voices.

People are such mindless sheep. They forget that Newt was "tea party" long before those others came along. Remember the one minute speeches, his taking down Speaker Jim Wright and building the revolution that took over the House? That victory was years in the making and Newt was out front in all of it. Perhaps, some should show a bit of gratitude to him for his efforts. I haven't forgotten.

36 posted on 08/01/2013 8:31:57 PM PDT by upsdriver ( Palin/West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Or, back to Tiffany’s ;)


37 posted on 08/01/2013 8:32:41 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drewh; Jim Robinson; RedMDer; The Cajun; musicman; TheOldLady; LibLieSlayer; deoetdoctrinae; ...
Gingrich said established Republicans will grow "more hysterical" as Paul and Cruz become "more powerful."

NEWT GINGRICH IS absolutely right.

Seen the game played too many times.

Destroy the TEA Party conservatives, then tell us we have to support the squishy moderate nominee because he's better than the demonic-rat.

NEVER AGAIN!

38 posted on 08/01/2013 8:39:25 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
What Gingrich says is true, his reasoning is correct as to the establishment's feelings of "discomfort," due primarily to the rest of the GOP refusing to follow their lead on gays, women and illegal aliens.

Kind of like saying, "Trust me, I'm from the government."

No longer, do we trust either the government nor the RNC "establishment" for they represent the same thing - "do as we say, NOT as we do!"

Unfortunately, Gingrich will say this today, then tomorrow (figuratively or not) he'll come down on Christie's side an saying Cruz and Paul are "out of the mainstream!" His credibility is seriously in question, in my mind.

39 posted on 08/01/2013 8:58:26 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

There is never a war that can’t be won.
Don’t be a defeatist.


40 posted on 08/01/2013 9:00:50 PM PDT by RedMDer (http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson