The article says no charges have been filed against the cop. That sounds like that part is still open and being looked into. That is garbage.
A robber comes in and points a gun at them and an off duty cop shoots him. What is to investigate? It’s too bad he didn’t kill the robber. It says he shot the robber twice from five feet away. Why is the robber still alive? If I had two shots from five feet, he would be dead, two in the chest to make sure I hit the chest and the next one in the brain.
“So far, there are no reports Pollard will face any charges for defending against the attack.”
Pollard was the security guard who shot the robber; Sutton was the cop who couldn’t get to his gun. I wonder if he had an ankle holster?, or was pinned in the booth somehow? Doesn’t elaborate.
Ever had to shoot someone under the stress of them having the ability to shoot back?
I didn’t think so.