Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freedom Party--What Would it Look like?

Posted on 07/25/2013 8:49:59 AM PDT by cradle of freedom

There has been talk about having a new party, some have called it the Freedom Party. If there were to be a Freedom Party what would be the party platforms?

Here are some thoughts that I have and I would welcome your suggestions.

1) Based on the Constitution 2) Government that serves not rules people 3) Restoring power to the individual citizen, towns and states 4)Respect for life from conception to natural death 5) Respects moral institutions based on the Ten Commandments 6) Respect for the hard earned money of the tax payers 7) Protecting self defense and 2nd Ammendment rights 8) An immigration policy that is based on what is good for Americans


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: freedomparty; palin; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: ansel12

yes. another person who gets what is happening to the GOP. it is becoming libertarian.


21 posted on 07/25/2013 9:26:08 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom; holdonnow; Biggirl; Fudd Fan
Freedom Party - I like the sound of this!

Still want to keep Tea Party...can they be 2 sides of one coin?

22 posted on 07/25/2013 9:27:02 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1; holdonnow; Biggirl; Fudd Fan
What would Freedom Party look like?

See post #3!!!

23 posted on 07/25/2013 9:29:06 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
Have you taken a look around the world recently? A weak President and weak America makes for a very bad world economy. A good President surrounds themselves with people who can handle the Presidents appointed tasks, they would appoint a "CFO" to administer while the President himself is busy running the country and returning us to the status of leader of the free world.

Surround yourself with the best people you can find, delegate authority, and don't interfere as long as the policy you've decided upon is being carried out.

Ronald Reagan

24 posted on 07/25/2013 9:30:51 AM PDT by Ghost of SVR4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
America's Party

Platform

25 posted on 07/25/2013 9:32:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life. Liberty. Property. Marriage. Family. Sovereignty. Security. Borders. The Oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
There’s not going to be a viable 3rd party. Period.

You are correct. The election laws in the US, unlike those in Europe, make it very difficult for 3rd parties to compete.

Bet let's suppose for a moment that there could be a viable 3rd party. That would be a dream scenario for the Democrats! They'd love it!

Because there will be some conservatives who will be upset with the GOP and go 3rd party. And there will be some conservatives who will be upset with the 3rd party and stay with the GOP.

End result? The dem's win every election of any importance.

The only way out is to somehow replace the current GOP elite. Palin had a shot at that, but for various reasons it didn't happen.

So I'm just hoping another Palin or Reagan appears on the national scene. I can't see any other solution that works.

26 posted on 07/25/2013 9:33:05 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
"There’s not going to be a viable 3rd party."

Could Freedom Party take the place of Republican party?

Primary out RINOe and replace with FP candidates.

The Republican Party is no longer what the Republican Party used to be anyway.

27 posted on 07/25/2013 9:33:27 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Ditto.


28 posted on 07/25/2013 9:34:03 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

This is what I wrote in 2010, I believe, with regard to the Tea Party. I still believe that this is what we need:

“The tea party is not another political party. It is a group of like-minded individuals who have similar goals, ideals and objectives.

It’s a movement that calls for changes - smaller limited government, drastically reduced gov’t. spending, less taxes, a secure border, state’s rights, strong national defense.

We want our basic freedoms and liberties protected including gun ownership, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and protection of our property rights.

We are comprised of persons from all political venues, from all parts of the country, from all races and genders, all ages with the above issues special to our hearts foremost in our minds as we start the process of cleaning house.

Cleaning house the likes of which has never been seen. On both sides of the aisle. We don’t have the time or the desire to fight amongst ourselves.

Our focus should be laser sharp and pointed at any element in any area of government that does not represent the Constitution or the freedom of American people.” —MWESTMOM 2010


29 posted on 07/25/2013 9:36:45 AM PDT by MWestMom (Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

A little wordsmithing to make it absolutely clear:
1) ABIDE BY AND ENFORCE the Constitution
2) Government that IS LIMITED TO SERVING not DICTATING TO people
3) Restore power to the individual citizen, towns and states 4) PROTECT life from conception to natural death
5) Respect moral institutions based on the Ten Commandments 6) LIMIT SPENDING TO WHAT THE GOVERNMENT TAKES IN. ALL TAX INCREASES ARE TO VOTED ON NATIONALLY.
7) Protect self defense and MAINTAIN 2nd Amendment rights
8) ENFORCE immigration policy that REWARDS THOSE WHO COME HERE LEGALLY AND DEPORTS THOSE WHO COME ILLEGALLY.

Just my two cents.

And for the NSA trolls, FU.


30 posted on 07/25/2013 9:38:56 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Dismantling the ability of the Federal Bureaucracy to produce rules with the force of law which have never had an up-or-down vote in the Congress.


31 posted on 07/25/2013 9:40:37 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Here are my suggestions for a party platform.

*Rule of Law

*Constitutional Originalism

*Individual Liberty

*Individual Responsibility

*Individual Property Rights

*Capitalism

*Strong Military

*Decrease Central Authority

*Increase Federalism

*US Interests trump all others

*Balanced Budgets

*Reduce Spending

*Lower Taxes

*Austrian School Economics

*Pro strong 2nd Amendment

*Eliminate the Department of Education

*Eliminate the Department of Energy

*Eliminate the Department of Commerce

*Eliminate the Department of Agriculture

*Overturn Obamacare

*Fix Healthcare with free market competition

*NO on Abortion

*NO on Euthanasia

*NO on Amnesty for illegal immigrants- Yes on legal immigration

*NO on Homosexual Marriage- Yes on Family Values

*NO on Affirmative Action- Yes on performance based equal treatment

*NO on ‘Social Justice’ (socialism)- Yes on Equal Justice under the law

*NO on Perpetual Welfare- Yes on a reasonable and limited Social Safety Net

*NO on wasteful investment in high speed Rail, Wind and Solar Energy-

*Yes on Drilling in ANWR and Offshore, Clean Coal, Fracking and Energy Independence

*Anthropogenic Global Warming is a hoax- Climate Change has been part of earth’s history for millennia

*Intelligent Profiling for terrorist threats

*Protect Social Security- Choice of investment vehicle- Means testing

Principled societal framework must not compromise to accommodate the whims of society’s members it regulates. Society’s members must compromise themselves to live within the proven structure or else dystopian anarchy results.


32 posted on 07/25/2013 9:42:45 AM PDT by DWar ("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

It would be nice to have a viable 2nd party. What passes for Party #2 is just a sect of the ruling party, perfectly willing to moan and groan, but not really interested in governing.

It’s all bread and circuses anyway, just meant to placate the rabble and nothing ever changes.

And for the NSA trolls, FU.


33 posted on 07/25/2013 9:44:46 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
Unfortunately it will look small and impotent dividing votes among other small splinter parties. SORRY.
34 posted on 07/25/2013 9:48:12 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWar

We don’t need legal immigration, we need to end the colonization of America period. It really makes little difference if the next 100 or 500 million foreigners are legal or not, it still is a tidal wave that we cannot Americanize, and they will still vote democrat.


35 posted on 07/25/2013 9:58:42 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Santorum appeared on CBS and pronounced George Zimmerman guilty of murder, first degree. March-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

***DONT CALL IT THE FREEDOM PARTY***


36 posted on 07/25/2013 10:01:05 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

I believe we need leaders who will appoint administrators who will follow the leaders and support them.


37 posted on 07/25/2013 10:25:21 AM PDT by winkadink (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Zero immigration policy would shoot ourselves in the foot. We need engineers, doctors, technicians and American citizens are not graduating with those degrees in sufficient numbers to fill the positions needed. Unrestricted immigration and America will be overwhelmed. Zero immigration and America will not be able to grow or soon function. We need a slow growth immigration policy that favors occupations we need and allows time for integration and assimilation into American culture.


38 posted on 07/25/2013 10:32:10 AM PDT by DWar ("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I’m drawling the line at those white pantyhose. Lee Straightleg Jeans for everyone.


39 posted on 07/25/2013 10:37:14 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

It would look like a waste of votes. We need to take over or replace the current party. We don’t need a vote splitting (dem-electing) party.


40 posted on 07/25/2013 10:38:04 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson