Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Analyst: Rush Limbaugh ‘Represents The Confederacy’
nationalreview.com ^ | 7/22/2013 | Dimitrios Halikias

Posted on 07/23/2013 8:18:43 AM PDT by Bon of Babble

Rush Limbaugh would have sided with the confederacy during the Civil War, according to MSNBC analyst Dorian Warren.

Warren, a Columbia professor and fellow at the progressive Roosevelt Institute, explained that Limbaugh “represents the Confederacy. He would have been on that side that went to war around the question of slavery.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: confederacy; dixie; dorianwarren; limbaugh; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-216 next last
To: RJS1950

You missed my point entirely

Slavery was the issue, yes, but because the Fed was trying to force the states to eliminate it, and it was not up to the federal government to decide that - it was a state issue.

Not that Slavery was good, and should have been ‘allowed’, but it was not a federal issue.

Imagine if the issue was about the Federal govt forcing the states to buy health care. do you see what I mean now?

It WAS about states rights. Slavery was just a vehicle to assert federal power over states rights.


61 posted on 07/23/2013 9:11:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

msnbc represents pol pot, joseph stalin, marx and engels and satan.

LLS


62 posted on 07/23/2013 9:11:36 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Just like today, if a state tried to “opt out” of the left’s socialism,

they’d demand that the fedgov FORCE them to participate.

Leftists can’t stand the idea of someone doing something they don’t approve of.


63 posted on 07/23/2013 9:12:41 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950
What he offered them was keeping slavery which once again, they themselves stated was the reason for secession.

Not quite right. Lincoln himself, from day one and for years before he was elected, proclaimed that he had no power and no intention to interfere with slavery inside a state.

So he didn't offer to allow them to keep slavery. They already had that.

What he offered was that he would not oppose an amendment presently making its way through Congress that would irrevocably prohibit Congress from interfering with slavery in any state. IOW, no future amendment could change this.

This offer was rejected by southern leaders.

64 posted on 07/23/2013 9:13:06 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

The slave owners were Democrats.


65 posted on 07/23/2013 9:13:33 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Then what was it about BEFORE slaverybecame the issue?

Did the war start over some other issue?

(serious question)

[Like forcing them to buy health care maybe?]


66 posted on 07/23/2013 9:16:16 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

As my Late Mother used to say, “Some people are so smart, they’re stupid”.

Just another Marxist Mulatto with a victim attitude, nothing to see here.


67 posted on 07/23/2013 9:16:50 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (They can follow the Communist, I'll follow the Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Slavery was the issue, yes, but because the Fed was trying to force the states to eliminate it

Please provide evidence for this. There was no attempt by the Federal government to force, or even influence, slave states to abolish slavery prior to the 1860 election.

The issue in that election was entirely one of whether:

A. Slavery would be prohibited in the territories (Lincoln).

B. Slavery would be allowed to expand into the territories, with a federal slave code enforced to protect it (Bell and Breckenridge).

C. To allow slavery or not in a territory would be left up to the people of that territory (Douglas).

Abolishing slavery in states wasn't even discussed.

68 posted on 07/23/2013 9:18:08 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Dorian Warren would have been on the side of Stalin and Mao.


69 posted on 07/23/2013 9:26:44 AM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

70 posted on 07/23/2013 9:28:51 AM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
another headless hoodie wearing dope




This Message Not Approved by the NSA

71 posted on 07/23/2013 9:29:06 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (Macabre Crumpet of Caucasian Ethnicity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

The left represents Lunacy.


72 posted on 07/23/2013 9:29:43 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Goodbye America. Glad the majority of my years were spent during the good days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

You are confusing me - first you said slavery was the ONLY issue in the civil war, now you are saying it was not an issue at all

Please tell me what started the civil war, then... because I am confused now


73 posted on 07/23/2013 9:34:11 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Slavery was just one bullet point in the federal government’s list of acts against the states as was the Morrill Tariff. This and other taxes/tariffs that the northern states were trying to impose were strictly meant to hamstring the south and keep them behind the industrial north via protectionism. The north feared growth in the south and the availability of cheap labor either by slaves or the poor citizenry and acted to stifle growth in the south.


74 posted on 07/23/2013 9:34:29 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

On the same level as “Rush is a big fat poopie butt”.


75 posted on 07/23/2013 9:35:29 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
Rush Limbaugh would have sided with the confederacy during the Civil War, according to MSNBC analyst Dorian Warren.

Considering Cape Girardeau was in a heavily seccess part of the state, he probably would have. But what the hell does that have to do with anything in the 21st century?

76 posted on 07/23/2013 9:37:55 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
On FR Coming By "Clicking Here"!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


77 posted on 07/23/2013 9:38:31 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Slavery was a vehicle- but imagine if the southern states objected to the federal government telling them...oh, I dunno... that they had to buy health care?

What was it the federal government was telling the Southern states they could not do?

78 posted on 07/23/2013 9:39:26 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

“He would have been on that side that went to war around the question of slavery.”

Says a supporter of Obamacare, which takes posession of all of our physical beings. I can’t come up with a better comparison to our historical slavery than to have the ruling class actually own my physical body.....

Hey, morons, how does it feel to have slavery re-instated by the first black president.


79 posted on 07/23/2013 9:43:27 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

And Dorian Warren would have sided with the Crown during the revolution.

You know the left is losing when they play the race card.


80 posted on 07/23/2013 9:44:34 AM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson