Posted on 07/17/2013 1:54:59 PM PDT by BillyBoy
Liz Cheney Would Be Fourth Republican Senator To Back Gay Marriage
by David Mark
Liz Cheney, 2014 Republican Senate candidate in Wyoming, and daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney. AP There are few policy differences between Wyoming Republican Senate candidate Liz Cheney and the incumbent she's trying to oust in 2014, Sen. Mike Enzi. Except for one issue: Gay marriage. Unlike Enzi, the 46-year-old daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney supports the right for states to legalize gay marriage. At least that's what she said in 2009, in an interview with MSNBC, of all places. At that was a time when the notion of same-sex marriage had considerably less support. And that has even Daily Kos writer Scott Welch offering at least limited praise for Liz Cheney. Cheney, Welch writes: Seemed to indicate tentative support for marriage equality and LGBT rights at large, saying: 'Well, look I think, you know, my family has been very clear about this, that we think freedom means freedom for everybody and that this is an issue that states have to decide for themselves.' While Cheney's language is hardly a full-throated, ringing endorsement of equality ('this is an issue that states have to decide for themselves'), her aligning herself with her family is encouraging: her sister, Mary, who is an out lesbian and her father both are on record support marriage equality. She went on to reiterate opposition to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, expressed support for the State Department's extension of benefits to same-sex couples, and said, 'I think it's wrong to discriminate, in those relationships, based on someone's sexual preference.' Additionally, she supported repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. All this leads me to wonder, should we be rooting for Cheney in her primary campaign against Enzi? Don't get me wrong: I would abhor seeing either of them elected to the Senate. Both embrace the Tea Party agenda and the right's nutty conspiracy theories wholeheartedly. That being said, even if the primary is as ugly as possible, the winner of the GOP primary will, come 2014, be elected Senator in a state as ruby red as Wyoming. Given that either of them would both toe the Tea Party line if elected, why not root for Cheney in the hopes that she might be a sleeper vote for LGBT rights such as the Employee Non-Discrimination Act? It's hard to see on what issues she might be farther to the right than Enzi. If elected, Cheney would be the fourth Republican senator to back same-sex marriage, along with Mark Kirk, Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Rob Portman (Ohio). Most Democratic senators have said they support gay marriage.
Sen. Mike Enzi, her GOP primary opponent, opposes it
Editor-in-Chief
The ultimate stated purpose of the document:
"To secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity."
If there's no real marriage, there can be no Posterity, much less a Posterity that is Blessed.
As you promote the gay agenda throughout freerepublic, just as you are on this thread in defense of Liz Cheney’s candidacy which is titled “”Liz Cheney Would Be Fourth Republican Senator To Back Gay Marriage””, you should know that she is against a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.
Your path to gay marriage is a quick one, your support of the libertarian/leftist agenda is noted, again.
Widow benefits for federal service, legislation added to in years since, 1794, 1798, 1802, and so on.
USED to LOVE Liz.....but “SAY NO TO LIZ”!!!!!!!!
Noooo, it’s because of her LESBIAN SISTER!! IDIOCY!!! All DECENCY gets TRUMPED if your relative is a DEGENERATE!!!
geesh... THAT is NEVER going thru...get real.
They will continue to get Fed benefits but an non-gay state is under no compulsion to give state benefits.
Besides...the number of gay married people who work for the fed gov't and will be relocated is SO low.
Only 2% of the population is gay...even less are married or will get married (they are notoriously promiscuious) and even less have a federal job that will require relo.
Thanks for posting this.
Any politician who supports gay marriage supports infringing on the first amendment since that freedom is always attacked by gay rights activists.
Just say NOOO!to Liz Cheney. Bob
bump
cannot believe freepers would go for that
She’s toast, I hope...
As much as I’ve liked her as a pundit, the pro-homo marriage does it for me.
What else would she turn on?
Good luck, WY....
I love your screen name. It’s the nickname for male prostitutes in the P.I.
I don’t think that we’re on the same sheet of music.
As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, I support only traditional one man, one woman marriage. My emphasis for states to regulate marriage is because that’s what California’s legal majoritity voters wanted. It’s only because of pro-gay, PC interpretations of the Equal Protections Clause of Sec. 1 of the 14th Amendment by activist justices and CA judges that CA still has gay marriage.
Regarding Liz Cheney, again, Mr. Mark’s article wrongly implies that federal government can regulate / define marriage.
I don’t live there but I’d never vote for her.
What about her position says that she supports gay marriage?
Not all her beliefs are known. I admit I was taken in. Now I’m a skeptic about LC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.