Skip to comments.
Rolling Stone Defends Cover Featuring Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect (Firestorm Ensues)
Rolling Stone ^
| July 15,2013
| Staff
Posted on 07/17/2013 1:39:49 PM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Time Magazine had Hitler on its cover three times. I don't know what reaction it generated at the time but that Hitler managed to end up the cover three times, I would have to assume, Time Magazine didn't garner enough criticism to prevent them from having him on the cover as many times as he did.
1
posted on
07/17/2013 1:39:49 PM PDT
by
lbryce
To: lbryce
HYPE a rag that isn’t selling as much anymore!!!
WHATEVER it takes, right???
2
posted on
07/17/2013 1:42:47 PM PDT
by
mason-dixon
(As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
To: lbryce
They could have used a picture of him, that won’t make chicks go, “Wow, he’s dreamy.”
3
posted on
07/17/2013 1:44:40 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: lbryce
This should be fun to watch.
4
posted on
07/17/2013 1:46:07 PM PDT
by
GBA
(Our obamanation: Romans 1:18-32)
To: All
Rolling Stone is being provacative. The same way a hooker dresses provacative. They need attention to sell their goods.
Rolling Stone, like a lot of the media is irrelevent and nobody is paying any attention to them.
This is their way of getting attention.... It worked...unfortunately.
5
posted on
07/17/2013 1:46:56 PM PDT
by
OhhTee5
To: dfwgator
Don’t laugh. There is a Facebook group of young girls who do agree that he’s “dreamy”. AND they are raising money for his defense!!
To: Buckeye McFrog
7
posted on
07/17/2013 1:48:06 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: lbryce
Dzhokhar was a good boy, just tryin’ to turn his life around...waitin’ on Ramadan...lovin’ his Islam.....
8
posted on
07/17/2013 1:48:08 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
To: lbryce
Time Magazine had Hitler on its cover three times. Not only that, he was Time's Man of the Year in 1938--the next year, it was Stalin.
9
posted on
07/17/2013 1:48:17 PM PDT
by
Fiji Hill
To: lbryce
Now that he’s got his picture on the cover, he can buy five copies for his mother!
To: nascarnation
He’s gonna buy five copies for his mother.
11
posted on
07/17/2013 1:49:35 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: lbryce
It’s a big liberal magazine making a hero out of a guy who targeted a big liberal event in the bluest section of the voting map.
If you can’t follow all the ironies in that, I can’t help you.
12
posted on
07/17/2013 1:49:59 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
To: lbryce
They put him on the cover because he looks like a young Bob Dylan
13
posted on
07/17/2013 1:50:06 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: lbryce
I watches the video and I saw Crystal scream when she realized she was going to die. I saw Todd’s legs as they wheeled him away. Joker is not cool...joker needs to be terminated.
14
posted on
07/17/2013 1:51:27 PM PDT
by
ez
(Muslims do not play well with others.)
To: lbryce
Who knew Mic Jagger’s band owned a rag?
15
posted on
07/17/2013 1:51:36 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
To: lbryce
Want a useful BOYCOTT this is it,Well see whos in whos out ,Outs need to be outed for ever!!
To: PGR88
They might as well borrowed the line from their Jim Morrison cover.
“He’s Hot....He’s Sexy....And He’s a Terrorist”
17
posted on
07/17/2013 1:53:38 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: lbryce
I wonder how much the Saudis paid Rolling Stone to put him on the cover?
18
posted on
07/17/2013 1:53:57 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: lbryce; mickie; flaglady47
The filthy mag-rag should have shown a picture of the 8 year-old boy torn apart by the bomb....with the top half of his body on the cover and his bottom half on the back cover.
The Rolling Stone sickos might as well be hung for a cow as a calf if it's attention they want. /s
Leni
To: lbryce
Lets think back in time.
In the 1770’s a newsmagazine which which porrayed George III on its cover as a hero would be ripped off the stands and burned, the presses would be wrecked, and the printer tarred and feathered and road out of town on a rail.
Interesting. Who is worse, Tsarnaev or George III? I don’t think its George III.
20
posted on
07/17/2013 1:54:49 PM PDT
by
ZULU
((See: http://gatesofvienna.net/) Obama, do you hear me?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson