Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Juror pushes for new laws following Zimmerman trial
cnn.com ^ | 7/17/13 | Josh Levs. Dana Ford, and Holly Yan

Posted on 07/17/2013 11:34:14 AM PDT by ColdOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: ColdOne

She will not be denied her fifteen minutes of fame.


21 posted on 07/17/2013 11:44:15 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
"The juror said she wanted to find Zimmerman guilty of "not using his senses" "

How about we make everything illegal and use selective enforcement? No trial necessary. Hell, we are 1/2 way there already.

22 posted on 07/17/2013 11:44:20 AM PDT by dmcnash (Back off! I'm a Scientist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

jenteel in her interview mention the bloods and martin’s father was a member of the crips. Martin either was or was well on his way to being a gang member thug.


23 posted on 07/17/2013 11:44:31 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

IF jurist are going to be cowards and apologetic for upholding law...... we (innocent) will not stand a chance in abumo-world 5 years from now.


24 posted on 07/17/2013 11:45:38 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Everyone is in full CYA mode.


25 posted on 07/17/2013 11:45:38 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Maybe Tom Joyner can send both Rachel Jeantel and Juror 007 to Law Skoo?






This Message Not Approved by the NSA

26 posted on 07/17/2013 11:46:04 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

She reminds me of a person a network brings in as part of a crowd to watch a TV pilot to find out if it is viable and then afterward wants the network to use her as a programming consultant.

No thanks. She’s not qualified. Her arguments prove it.


27 posted on 07/17/2013 11:46:07 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Let’s get a “SOMEONE’S GONNA HAFTA PAY” law passed, right away.


28 posted on 07/17/2013 11:46:19 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
stock to her gums

Where are you from?
29 posted on 07/17/2013 11:47:09 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I have to avoid the topic of Zimmerman’s acquittal, as the useful idiots are everywhere. Just found my high school class on FB, or they found me...anyway, a very old friend who I was once close to posted an article on poor St. Trayvon to her page. Dear, God....she was in honors classes in high school, what happened to her brain since then? The waitress at my fav diner just graduated with her bachelor degree in geology....I was afraid to ask what she meant by being hooked on the Zimmerman trial...just couldn’t take it if she was another useful idiot and did not want to know either way.


30 posted on 07/17/2013 11:47:17 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Isn’t she the juror who got roasted in the social media for trying to shop a book idea? Maybe she has been outed and now feels threatened if she doesn’t toe the liberal line.


31 posted on 07/17/2013 11:47:32 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Nobody forced them to raise the boy outside the bounds of a committed married relationship.
Nobody forced them to raise a thug.
Yes, liberty is dangerous. There needs to be more laws restricting stupidity. (/sarc)
32 posted on 07/17/2013 11:48:27 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
What in the blazes is her mental problem? I see her now starting a new career into creating a "Maybe guilty" verdict.

Meanwhile, a new law should be created that jurors should keep silent or face jail time, a year for each hour they deliberated. If one juror speaks, all jurors are fined.

33 posted on 07/17/2013 11:48:35 AM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

Seriously, if the jury had declared open season for thugs,
we’d be in a civil war within a couple of years.

When people know they can’t find justice in the jury system,
they’ll start taking matters into their own hands.


34 posted on 07/17/2013 11:49:16 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Of course we should modify centuries of law because this twit got emotional! Sure, what could possibly go wrong?


35 posted on 07/17/2013 11:49:47 AM PDT by cdcdawg (Be seeing you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

” No other family should be forced to endure what the Martin family has endured,”

This logic happens in a lot of cases....no reliance on facts, just concern for emotional issues.


This is why I cringe at woman judges and woman juries. Emotional thinking is quite a valuable asset, but it has its weaknesses. Decision making in a court of law is one of them. You need people, cough *males* cough, who can “compartmentalize like Bill Clinton” and focus on the specific task. The job of the jury is not to determine the emotional impact of their decisions. Rather, it is to determine if the guy being accused can be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Period. Anything else is what we call “scope creep”.

Women are natural multitaskers and want to bring all sorts of irrelevent information to bear. It is important to be able to identify the irrelevant info and separate the chaff from the wheat. Men naturally do that better, though this has its own weaknesses that are to be held for other relevant threads.


36 posted on 07/17/2013 11:50:05 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Her CNN interview has brought on the spotlight. She’s been getting threats so now she’s trying to defuse the situation.


37 posted on 07/17/2013 11:50:05 AM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“Laws” exist to punish stupidity.
They exist in this thing called “reality”.

Trayvon experienced the consequences of one of those laws.


38 posted on 07/17/2013 11:50:47 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Has anyone else noticed that jurors in high-profile cases have now taken on celebrity status? It used to be that they just faded into the background.


39 posted on 07/17/2013 11:50:57 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
'"My prayers are with all those who have the influence and power to modify the laws that left me with no verdict option other than 'not guilty' in order to remain within the instructions.'

Translation: People 4 times smarter than I (A.K.A. halfwits) finally got through to me that since I came forward and blabbed my chances of remaining anonymous are "slim" and "none" and Slim done left town. So I am gonna blame the system to try and save myself.

40 posted on 07/17/2013 11:51:16 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson