Skip to comments.
Exclusive: Juror pushes for new laws following Zimmerman trial
cnn.com ^
| 7/17/13
| Josh Levs. Dana Ford, and Holly Yan
Posted on 07/17/2013 11:34:14 AM PDT by ColdOne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: ColdOne
She will not be denied her fifteen minutes of fame.
21
posted on
07/17/2013 11:44:15 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: ColdOne
"The juror said she wanted to find Zimmerman guilty of "not using his senses" "
How about we make everything illegal and use selective enforcement? No trial necessary. Hell, we are 1/2 way there already.
22
posted on
07/17/2013 11:44:20 AM PDT
by
dmcnash
(Back off! I'm a Scientist.)
To: DonaldC
jenteel in her interview mention the bloods and martin’s father was a member of the crips. Martin either was or was well on his way to being a gang member thug.
23
posted on
07/17/2013 11:44:31 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: ColdOne
IF jurist are going to be cowards and apologetic for upholding law...... we (innocent) will not stand a chance in abumo-world 5 years from now.
24
posted on
07/17/2013 11:45:38 AM PDT
by
kimtom
(USA ; Freedom is not Free)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Everyone is in full CYA mode.
25
posted on
07/17/2013 11:45:38 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: ColdOne
Maybe Tom Joyner can send both Rachel Jeantel and Juror 007 to Law Skoo?
This Message Not Approved by the NSA
To: chris37
She reminds me of a person a network brings in as part of a crowd to watch a TV pilot to find out if it is viable and then afterward wants the network to use her as a programming consultant.
No thanks. She’s not qualified. Her arguments prove it.
27
posted on
07/17/2013 11:46:07 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: ColdOne
Let’s get a “SOMEONE’S GONNA HAFTA PAY” law passed, right away.
28
posted on
07/17/2013 11:46:19 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: SE Mom
stock to her gums
Where are you from?
29
posted on
07/17/2013 11:47:09 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
To: ColdOne
I have to avoid the topic of Zimmerman’s acquittal, as the useful idiots are everywhere. Just found my high school class on FB, or they found me...anyway, a very old friend who I was once close to posted an article on poor St. Trayvon to her page. Dear, God....she was in honors classes in high school, what happened to her brain since then? The waitress at my fav diner just graduated with her bachelor degree in geology....I was afraid to ask what she meant by being hooked on the Zimmerman trial...just couldn’t take it if she was another useful idiot and did not want to know either way.
30
posted on
07/17/2013 11:47:17 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: ColdOne
Isn’t she the juror who got roasted in the social media for trying to shop a book idea? Maybe she has been outed and now feels threatened if she doesn’t toe the liberal line.
31
posted on
07/17/2013 11:47:32 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: MrB
Nobody forced them to raise the boy outside the bounds of a committed married relationship.
Nobody forced them to raise a thug. Yes, liberty is dangerous. There needs to be more laws restricting stupidity. (/sarc)
32
posted on
07/17/2013 11:48:27 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: ColdOne
What in the blazes is her mental problem? I see her now starting a new career into creating a "Maybe guilty" verdict.
Meanwhile, a new law should be created that jurors should keep silent or face jail time, a year for each hour they deliberated. If one juror speaks, all jurors are fined.
To: kimtom
Seriously, if the jury had declared open season for thugs,
we’d be in a civil war within a couple of years.
When people know they can’t find justice in the jury system,
they’ll start taking matters into their own hands.
34
posted on
07/17/2013 11:49:16 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: ColdOne
Of course we should modify centuries of law because this twit got emotional! Sure, what could possibly go wrong?
35
posted on
07/17/2013 11:49:47 AM PDT
by
cdcdawg
(Be seeing you...)
To: DonaldC
No other family should be forced to endure what the Martin family has endured,
This logic happens in a lot of cases....no reliance on facts, just concern for emotional issues.
This is why I cringe at woman judges and woman juries. Emotional thinking is quite a valuable asset, but it has its weaknesses. Decision making in a court of law is one of them. You need people, cough *males* cough, who can “compartmentalize like Bill Clinton” and focus on the specific task. The job of the jury is not to determine the emotional impact of their decisions. Rather, it is to determine if the guy being accused can be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Period. Anything else is what we call “scope creep”.
Women are natural multitaskers and want to bring all sorts of irrelevent information to bear. It is important to be able to identify the irrelevant info and separate the chaff from the wheat. Men naturally do that better, though this has its own weaknesses that are to be held for other relevant threads.
36
posted on
07/17/2013 11:50:05 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: ColdOne
Her CNN interview has brought on the spotlight. Shes been getting threats so now shes trying to defuse the situation.
37
posted on
07/17/2013 11:50:05 AM PDT
by
Java4Jay
(The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
To: Sopater
“Laws” exist to punish stupidity.
They exist in this thing called “reality”.
Trayvon experienced the consequences of one of those laws.
38
posted on
07/17/2013 11:50:47 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: ColdOne
Has anyone else noticed that jurors in high-profile cases have now taken on celebrity status? It used to be that they just faded into the background.
39
posted on
07/17/2013 11:50:57 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: ColdOne
'"My prayers are with all those who have the influence and power to modify the laws that left me with no verdict option other than 'not guilty' in order to remain within the instructions.' Translation: People 4 times smarter than I (A.K.A. halfwits) finally got through to me that since I came forward and blabbed my chances of remaining anonymous are "slim" and "none" and Slim done left town. So I am gonna blame the system to try and save myself.
40
posted on
07/17/2013 11:51:16 AM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson