Posted on 07/17/2013 11:34:14 AM PDT by ColdOne
(CNN) -- The woman known as Juror B37 in the George Zimmerman trial released a statement exclusively to CNN Wednesday pushing for new laws.
"My prayers are with all those who have the influence and power to modify the laws that left me with no verdict option other than 'not guilty' in order to remain within the instructions. No other family should be forced to endure what the Martin family has endured," she wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
She must have been the lib holding up things.
*sigh*....
“An option of “guilty, even though you’re not” should be provided for in the law...”
Yep, she wants to prove to the world that she’s really liberal.
Forced to use logic and, while she did, it hurt so bad she must find an outlet. Obviously the emotional rants by the persecutor did make some impact.
Nobody forced them to raise the boy outside the bounds of a committed married relationship.
Nobody forced them to raise a thug.
Juror B37, no family should have to endure what the Zimmerman family has endured and is still enduring.
I appreciate your finding the fact that Zimmerman was not guilty, anyone who is honest can see that he was not guilty.
Now, beyond that, why don’t you drink a nice, tall glass of STFU.
” No other family should be forced to endure what the Martin family has endured,”
This logic happens in a lot of cases....no reliance on facts, just concern for emotional issues.
Raise your Kids with a degree of care and you won't have to.
time to make stand your ground part of the constitutition in order to remove it from politicians.
Sounds like juror B37 has been talking to Jasmine Rand.
She should move to NYC and she can everything she wants. Isn’t self defense illegal there?
This lady is a flake. Mr. Zimmerman is a very lucky fellow to be free. This woman could have just as easily wound up voting “guilty.”
Somehow I think this is the Chicago Hispanic lady who was holding things up..go back to watching your reality shows lady you did your job
I think they might have gone for negligent homicide - even though it was self defense - as a compromise verdict.
Overbilled the case just like in the Casey Anthony situation.
But what changes to the law would allow someone to beat you and not allow you to defense yourself??
This is gun control by another name. It’s keep white Hispanics as victims and compliant rather than have blacks take risks when they start fights or rob.
That’s why CCW exists - to create an environment when any criminal could be shot at any time.
Then they should have done a better job raising their little saint. The rest of us want to be able to legally defend ourselves.
It was a miracle George Zimmerman was acquitted. No man should be punished for an error in judgement because some thug jumped him. Ground and pound should be criminal. Heck, one punch and he broke George’s nose. The thug got what was coming to him, his parents had to have seen this coming. The rest of the world did.
No she went not-guilty from first vote.
I have a hunch she got nailed by the libs. .and doesn’t have the spine to stock to her gums. .so she is trying to fix it
,
I scanned the entire article. Where did the juror suggest the law should be changed?
Did I miss it, reading on my phone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.