She must have been the lib holding up things.
Yep, she wants to prove to the world that she’s really liberal.
No she went not-guilty from first vote.
I have a hunch she got nailed by the libs. .and doesn’t have the spine to stock to her gums. .so she is trying to fix it
,
“She must have been the lib holding up things.”
She told Anderson Cooper that she was one of the 3 “not guilty” on the first poll. She never wavered during jury deliberations.
Closer to the truth may be:
Zhang Fei: She will not be denied her fifteen minutes of fame.
SE Mom: I have a hunch she got nailed by the libs. .and doesn’t have the spine to stock to her gums. .so she is trying to fix it
jazusamo: Sounds like juror B37 has been talking to Jasmine Rand.
Also, she told Cooper that she had a book deal, but not long after her interview with Cooper, it was rescinded.
Twitter user swiftly sabotages Zimmerman juror’s book deal
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3043819/posts
I’ll give her credit where credit is due. Her determination was made by using current law - not how she “felt”. Now maybe she feels the law should change, but at least she’s doing it in the proper order.
Or to get attention. WHo knows?