Posted on 07/14/2013 4:09:01 PM PDT by neverdem
Every so often there's that obligatory article asking, "Are Women Superior at_____?" or "Do Women Make Better ______?," with politicians often being the focus.
Of course, the question is always asked rhetorically. No matter the facts of the case, you'll never hear, "We examined the issue exhaustively from all perspectives, consulted with premier authorities in the discipline, collated the data, and have determined that in..."...
--snip--
Lawrence is fair to the not-fairer sex, though, writing that "some men" are "trying to make things work better"; these would be "[a]spiring deal-makers in today's Senate" such as "John McCain, South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham, New York Democrat Chuck Schumer, Virginia Democrat Mark Warner, and Tennessee Republican Bob Corker[.]"
And you put all those guys together, and you still have Low T.
Transitioning to High E, Lawrence emphasizes how "[s]ome of the strongest bipartisan relationships are among the women themselves" (that's easy when your ideology is basically the same) and also reports, "The members have thrown showers for women who are getting married or adopting children. They socialize with their families at each other's homes. They run together and discuss how to juggle a Senate career and the responsibility of raising young children." Yes, it's the Divine Secrets of the Tax-and-Spend Sisterhood.
Look, let's cut the (I'll be sexist) male bovine. It's well-known by the less brainwashed that women are creatures of the flock; they don't like going against the group, which is one reason I didn't think the women judging George Zimmerman would give us a hung jury (though I did predict an acquittal two days ago). And, thank God, this time 6 Collaborating Women did the job of 12 Angry Men. But there's another way of saying women are of the flock.
They are creatures of the collective.
And of collectivism...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
men.
one verdict ought not bring up such a question, these were not elected women. further several had engineering husbands, one was a lawyer, so we’re talking about women attracted to men who are very logical and ethodical and organized.
“And women will rule over them,” is a quote from the Scriptures about the folly of nations run by women. Women, in general, have problems with cold logic. They are by nature more nurturing and emotional than men. They are also more “catty.” The last thing that any country needs is to be ruled over by women. Matriarchal societies are exceedingly cruel. We do not need a Jezebel in the White House.
Govern? In an ideal world, Godly men would make the law and Godly women, being more empathetic by nature, would apply the law, the home and community writ large. Reality does not allow this, however. In most situations wherein the law is brought to bear, being logical and dispassionate is the only course approximating justice.
Caring and empathy when dealing with criminals leads to all manner of injustice in the larger realm, whether or not this might be appropriate in any given individual circumstance. Are women capable of being dispassionate and logical? Of course, and there are outstanding examples of such. We’ve just seen a fine instance of this in Florida. Are women as a group noted for this, absolutely not. Argue ‘till you’re blue in the face, ladies, but amongst yourselves you know it’s true.
Remove Godly from the equation and all bets are off. Do you want to ultimately end up with a brutal dictatorship or a smothering nanny state? Smothering nanny state is what we’ve gotten thus far, since the advent of this era of apparent female dominance. There has to be an enforcement arm of even a matriarchy, however, and so we’ll eventually have both.
Much better than those old dead white men ever managed, huh? /s
Giving women the right to ushered in socialism.
A Dagger at the Heart of Justice (Mark Steyn)
Brian Schweitzer gives GOP Senate hopes new life
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
Recent feminists and SNAGs in leadership positions have pretty much driven a wooden stake through the heart of that notion. [SNAGS: sensitive New Age guys.] They can keep pushing it, though, right through the remainder of the default process and eventual economic depositions of pathological, favored constituents. Consumers won’t start buying again in spite of measures being taken by leadership against the law of our land.
Thanks for the ping!
Repeal the 19th!! ;)
If you want to gin up your readership and attract a few more ad-buyers, post a “battle of the sexes” column. As predictable as rain in the Southeast this summer.
Because the quality of governance depends on a person’s plumbing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.