Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimmerman probably immune from civil suit (vanity)
Florida statutes ^ | 7/14/2013 | me

Posted on 07/14/2013 8:40:18 AM PDT by freedumb2003

The 2012 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI CRIMES Chapter 776 JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE

776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force.— (1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant. (2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful. (3) The court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (1). History.—s. 4, ch. 2005-27.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: blackkk; ericholder; florida; georgezimmerman; removeholder; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
I know we shouldn't post vanities here but this is really on point...
1 posted on 07/14/2013 8:40:18 AM PDT by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3042754/posts?page=12#12


2 posted on 07/14/2013 8:43:30 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Assuming, of course, that the rule of law will prevail. Remember, these are the people who found gay marriage and the right to an abortion in the U. S. Constitution. Anything can happen.


3 posted on 07/14/2013 8:44:05 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Under Florida law, yes, you are probably correct. That is why they will attack him under federal law, which seems far more flexible under the current administration.


4 posted on 07/14/2013 8:46:15 AM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You are correct. That is why DOJ will pursue a civil rights suit if they can convince enough people that a Hispanic killing an African-American is subject to civil rights law.

CNN: Zimmerman is a white Hispanic.
Then, isn’t Obama a white African-American?


5 posted on 07/14/2013 8:51:07 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rey

Under what federal law ? Civil rights violation can be brought only against Law Enforcement officers.


6 posted on 07/14/2013 8:52:21 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Obama’s trinity church is holding a seance to allow Trayvon to speak about the trial outcome.


7 posted on 07/14/2013 8:55:37 AM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Should we have the mod delete/lock this thread?

I think it is significant enough to warrant its own (with appropriate kudos to you for getting there first).


8 posted on 07/14/2013 8:55:39 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Zimmerman could live at a Russian airport.


9 posted on 07/14/2013 8:56:49 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Not Guilty by reason of sanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Thanks for posting that info. It doesn’t shield Zimmerman from the Dept of Injustice but it does derail the Crump gravy train that Tryvon’s parents have been riding.


10 posted on 07/14/2013 8:59:38 AM PDT by meatloaf (3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

oh no, I think it is appropriate.


11 posted on 07/14/2013 9:00:48 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Civil suits can be brought against anyone representing/acting as an agent of the government(local, state, federal). I was party to such a suit as a civilian agent for the State of California.


12 posted on 07/14/2013 9:01:12 AM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yadent

I should have said Civil Rights violation suits...


13 posted on 07/14/2013 9:02:39 AM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
First question...is he literally *immune*,meaning that any attempt to bring a civil action against him will be met with an immediate,and automatic,refusal to accept it by the court? Secondly,if the answer to the previous question is "yes" is he also immune from a *Federal* civil suit?

I think that it's understood that this nation's race pimp industry,with the full support of the parents,will try to milk this for all it's worth...both in the Florida *and* Federal courts.

14 posted on 07/14/2013 9:02:41 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
IMHO, pursuing a "violation of civil rights" case (ala Rodney King) after exoneration in a criminal trial is just another cynical and corrupt government manufactured loophole to violate and bypass the US Constitution.

It clearly violates the word and spirit of the 5th amendment constitutional restriction on double jeopardy, regardless of what self-serving government officials, politicians and judges might say.

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


15 posted on 07/14/2013 9:06:03 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Correct.

Zimmerman = a White Hispanic.

Obama = a White Black.


16 posted on 07/14/2013 9:06:34 AM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rey

If it’s federal, then it’s the entire country’s tax payer money that will be used.


17 posted on 07/14/2013 9:08:35 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

>> is he literally *immune*,meaning that any attempt to bring a civil action against him will be met with an immediate,and automatic,refusal to accept it by the court?

You could read what Florida law says... if you could read.

http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/776.032


18 posted on 07/14/2013 9:10:51 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yadent

Watch ‘em argue that Block Watch is sufficient “color of authority” to constitute state action. This DOJ can concoct any reality it can imagine.


19 posted on 07/14/2013 9:24:27 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Of that I have no doubt.


20 posted on 07/14/2013 9:27:45 AM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson