We're not hearing much from all the men (and women) who made negative comments about emotional and intellectually inferior women and their inability to make a rational decision.
How about some apologies from you folks?
I never said anything like that, but on behalf of my dim-witted brethren, I do apologize.
We’re not hearing much from all the men (and women) who made negative comments about emotional and intellectually inferior women and their inability to make a rational decision.
How about some apologies from you folks?
...sigh...you’ve heard several responses from me on this matter, and if you need another, here it is...
...I made no comment about female intellect, so I can’t respond to that; what I did pontificate upon was the conflict resolution avoidance that women, by their less aggressive natures, tend to adopt...avoidance of conflict yields an attitude of compromise and conciliation, which in this case might translate into an empathic desire to satisfy each party, at least to the degree possible(think ‘manslaughter’...)however, as we know, such a conciliation was in fact impossible...
...if you disagree with this, then tell me why the prosecution made such naked and blatant emotional appeals, referring incessantly to Trayvon as a child, and tugging at traditional maternal heartstrings, in order to try and sway the case...which was so obvious that even the obtuse punditry on TV remarked on it often...
...Bernie and his bunch knew what their best shot was with this particular jury, and they took it...
Any comments I made were based on what I was hearing from female “friends.”
I thank God for answering our prayers and giving GZ his freedom!