[Gay State Conservative]

Saint Trayvon’s DC “Dad” is pulling the strings (behind the scenes) as we so convincingly learned just yesterday.

[DonaldC]

Can’t blame them for trying to turn horse crap into a hershey bar.

[TurboZamboni]

charge him for littering the sidewalk with blood from his head!

[FlingWingFlyer]

Just another example proving that the so called “justice system” in this country is a farce. I thought the OJ circus was messed up but this circus has that one beat. IMHO.

[PLD]

That prosecutor is boring I wonder if the jury is still awake.He is putting me to sleep..

[molson209]

Is the Court of appeal also in Obama/Holders pockets ?

[sappy]

sharpton getting fitted for a new riot inciting suit

[DoughtyOne]

He’s looking at the wall, desperately hoping to see something that didn’t fall off after he threw stuff at it.

[CrazyIvan]

This is a method that is taught in any sales seminar. You shift the decision from “should I buy” to “which one do I buy” by introducing another possibility to the customer.

[nothingnew]

Where's Hamilton Burger when you need him?

What a joke that closing argument is.

FMCDH(BITS)

[wideawake]

Again, this case is a reverse of normal procedure.

The assumption of this trial is that Trayvon Martin in the defendant, George Zimmerman is the prosecutor, and all the pro-Martin camp has to do is prove that there is reasonable doubt that Trayvon Martin was a bad actor in order to convict Zimmerman.

It's inside out and upside down.

[miss marmelstein]

I also was questioning the “you decide” angle. This is not Ripley’s Believe It or Not comic strip - it’s a real person’s life at stake. I hope the jury is savvy enough to see through this - but I doubt it.

[kenmcg]

The judge in that case is a most incompetent shill for the prosecution. She should be disbarred. If she could charge Zimmermann for being out after dark she would. After some of these high profile cases, one can assume that the Fl. judicial system needs an overhaul, but it won’t happen.

[Pollster1]

The prosecutor, in his closing, is presenting possibilities of theories, multiple, and asking the jury to choose from some weird buffet of the circumstances.

This is a classic "reasonable doubt" tactic - lawyers do it all the time. The prosecution is simply throwing out a whole bunch of implausible speculations in the hope that the collection of ideas as a whole might seem plausible. The total package of evidence clearly proves that George Zimmerman lawfully defended himself, and the prosecution is trying to introduce some doubt into that conclusion. Fortunately for Obama's side, federal pressure has flipped the trial, and Zimmerman's side is required to prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.

[SampleMan]

I’m surprised that the judge hasn’t decided to force the defense to give their summation before the prosecution.

[Sopater]

The prosecutor, in his closing, is presenting possibilities of theories, multiple, and asking the jury to choose from some weird buffet of the circumstances.

Doesn't he just have to show that there is some reasonable doubt as to his innocence? /sarc