Good news.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: CivilWarBrewing
It’s all a ruse. It was planned that way. The prosecution asked for that charge simply for judge pain in the face to throw it out making her look fair. There was nothing fair about this judge or this trial.
115 posted on
07/11/2013 11:10:31 AM PDT by
Wiggins
To: CivilWarBrewing
That daft femcow was only will to whore her judicial duties so much
121 posted on
07/11/2013 11:24:10 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(the next Dark Ages are coming as Western Civilization crumbles with nary a whimper)
To: CivilWarBrewing
Why not? I'm always told that he was a little boy hunted down and murdered by a rogue thug. Would the media lie to us? /s
122 posted on
07/11/2013 11:24:12 AM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: CivilWarBrewing
Nelson has made it obvious the she is an affirmative action hack. Bob
128 posted on
07/11/2013 11:40:00 AM PDT by
alstewartfan
("You have the most appealing surface I have seen. Bring it over here. Lay it down by me." Al Stewart)
To: CivilWarBrewing
Do any freepers know what the dialectic is? The judge of this kangaroo court just pulled the dialectic. It is a marxian move wherein you move two steps forward and then one step back. The naive observer thinks the marxist has had a change of heart. Nothing could be farther from the truth! Zimmerman was charged with 2nd degree murder. This so-called judged threw out the prosecutions post-trial charge of ‘child abuse’ and instead informed the jury they could convict on the basis of a manslaughter charge instead - a clear example of the dialectic! I think she is working for the prosecution who knows their original charge is baseless!
To: CivilWarBrewing
135 posted on
07/11/2013 11:52:58 AM PDT by
Lucky9teen
(Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.~Thomas Jeffer)
To: CivilWarBrewing
But they got it out in the news one more time. Trayvon was merely a child.
143 posted on
07/11/2013 12:42:11 PM PDT by
informavoracious
(We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby. Obamacare: shovel-ready healthcare.)
To: CivilWarBrewing
146 posted on
07/11/2013 1:11:43 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: CivilWarBrewing
I was pleasantly surprised by this ruling. This judge has been so hostile to Zimmerman and his attorneys I thought she had become a de facto member of the prosecution.
158 posted on
07/11/2013 5:53:13 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Revolting cat!
To: Revolting cat!
To: CivilWarBrewing
I am glad that the judge has ruled out this (downright silly) option.
What I continue to fear, however, is that the jury may decide upon a "compromise" verdict; and find Zimmerman guilty of manslaughter, rather than second-degree murder.
And this, I believe, would be a travesty. For either he is guilty of second-degree murder or he is entirely innocent (depending upon whom one believes).
I tend to think the latter is more likely. And I certainly cannot imagine that one might believe that Zimmerman is guilty of murder beyond all reasonable doubt.
But I would very much dislike any attempt to split the baby here...
165 posted on
07/11/2013 9:54:34 PM PDT by
AmericanExceptionalist
(Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
To: CivilWarBrewing
This judge needs to be investigated by the Florida Judicial Qualification Commission for incompetence at the very least. Her malfeasance in this case is beyond the pale, even for Flori-DUH and I'm a lifelong born and raised citizen of this fair state. She makes me ashamed to say that, a little.
167 posted on
07/12/2013 1:32:27 AM PDT by
ExSoldier
(Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
To: CivilWarBrewing
Where did Jebbie find this judge? Where did Ford find John Paul Stevens, who according to Ford was his greatest achievement in office. Is Nelson Jebbie’s biggest achievement? Will he put her on the Supreme Court in 2017?
171 posted on
07/12/2013 6:37:32 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson