Posted on 07/10/2013 5:17:13 AM PDT by Kaslin
Wyoming Senator Mike Enzi is a loyal Republican, a decent guy, and generally a good senator. He also needs to retire from the Senate because he is not good enough, and I don’t care if that makes him sad.
The New York Times probably thought it was helping him recently when it ran an article about how Dick Cheney’s daughter Liz is planning to challenge him in the 2014 Republican primary. The Times hailed him as “a studious, low-key legislator who worked well with Senator Edward M. Kennedy,” and Enzi probably thinks that’s a compliment.
For that reason alone he needs to go.
He needs to go because we can do better. It’s not about Mike Enzi or any other Republican politician. It’s about winning this war against progressivism, and if you aren’t leading the fight then bow out and make room for someone who will.
Liz Cheney will. The seat would hardly be at risk – the Wyoming GOP primary is better known as the Wyoming general election – so we can take the chance to do better. After all, Liz Cheney has something Enzi doesn’t – a taste for political combat.
She wants to win. Not to “compromise,” not to “work together,” not sit around singing “Kumbayah” with the liberals. She wants to win.
Enzi wants to be a sober, serious legislator working with his liberal friends across the aisle to make a better country. Except there are no friends across the aisle, and the liberals do not want to make this a better country. Liberals want to ruthlessly acquire and maintain power and control over every aspect of our lives, and anyone who does not see and understand that and who can’t commit to destroying their hideous plans for our country needs to get out the way for a true conservative warrior.
The Times, perhaps again thinking it was helping, noted that Enzi “avoids political talk shows because, he says, their goal is to get guests to ‘beat up on their colleagues.’”
Except we need GOP Senators to be willing to “beat up on their colleagues.” It’s not about collegiality in the cloakroom. We want you hated, despised, and targeted because that will mean you are getting something conservative done.
We want Ted Cruzes and Rand Pauls, not Lindsey Grahams (By the way, South Carolina, somebody needs to get busy primarying Chuck Schumer’s best buddy).
Worse, Enzi has started to forget about what conservatives do and do not do. He was a prime mover behind the internet sales tax folly. Here’s a hint: Republicans don’t collect taxes for liberal states.
Now, I expect Enzi and the other GOP Senators who should be primaried for failing to perform at a maximum level of effectiveness to feel hurt, upset and even angry. After all, they’ve generally been reliable votes for conservative policies – incomprehensible apostasies like the internet sales tax notwithstanding. Enzi will no doubt take it personally.
It’s not personal.
It has nothing to do with Enzi and everything to do with making a clear-eyed assessment of who will be the most powerful advocate for conservatism in the Senate. A “low-key,” “studious” backbencher with a passion for bipartisan consensus who won’t make the case for conservatism in the media because it might offend some of his liberal pals is not it.
We conservatives owe Enzi nothing. Nothing. Serving three terms in the Senate was reward enough for services rendered to the cause – in fact, that he’s served three should probably disqualify him by itself.
For too long the GOP has given nominations to the next old dude in line because he was a nice guy who hung around longest. For every Tea Party-linked former witch or half-witted would-be obstetrician, there are many more nice guys who ended up finishing last.
Remember President McCain? Me neither. Nominating McCain gave us President Obama and, arguably worse, Meghan McCain.
This needs to stop. We need to ruthlessly identify and select the strongest conservative voice who can win in every election even if good men like Enzi have to move aside. It’s not about their hurt feelings. I don’t care about their feelings, not even a little. Nor should you.
If Liz Cheney fails to win the nomination, I’ll eagerly support Enzi because it’s not about Cheney either. If and when she stops being useful to conservatism, I’ll support someone else.
Call it the “Rubio Effect.”
Mike Enzi is a good senator, but not a great one. We can do better, and when the future of our country is at stake, a “good enough” conservative is nowhere near good enough. He can leave with his head held high, with our respect despite some minor disagreements. Or he can choose to fight a bruising primary battle against Cheney that his pal Alan Simpson says could cause “the destruction of the Republican Party of Wyoming.”
And for what? For the chance to spend six more years checking the boxes, but not making any waves?
It’s time to go, Senator, preferably at the top of your game and with dignity. But, one way or another, it is time to go. To quote Abe Vigoda in The Godfather, “Mike, it was only business.” Now get in the car, Senator.
What are her positions on gun control, gay marriage, and immigration?
And since you are from Nebraska why don't you concern yourself about one your senators who is running for reelection like Mike Johanns whose ACU rating in Congress is only 80% compared to Mitch McConnel whose ACU rating in Congress is 100%
Here are the ratings of Mitch McConnell my neighboring state senator
Mitch McConnel
100% pro life 100%
ACU rating (Congress) 90%
lifetime Gun owners of America 100%
NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Illegal Immigration at the Border 100%
NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Illegal Jobs and Presence 100%
NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Positions - Reduce Amnesty Enticements 100%
Yes Johanns has also a 100% pro life ratings like most republicans
Take Back (from Dem incumbent)
Alaska – Begich
Arkansas – Pryor
Colorado – Udall
Louisiana – Landrieu
Montana – Baucus
North Carolina – Hagan
South Dakota - Johnson
West Virginia - Rockefeller
Upgrade (from lesser conservative)
Georgia – Chambliss
South Carolina – Graham
Tennessee – Alexander
Texas – Cornyn
Wyoming - Enzi
Your thoughts, edits or additions? With the exception of Colorado (should be GOP), every state went Romney in 2012.
Oh ... wait ...
She is not "from Wyoming". She may have been born there but she lived the majority of her life in Virgnia. She got her undergrad degree in Colorado and her law school degree in Chicago, which means she has spent more time in both those states than in Wyoming, and her kids were born, raised, and educated in Virginia. She has much stronger ties to Virginia so she should have challenged Warner. Her ties to Wyoming are tenuous at best, and if you want to use the carpetbagger label then yeah, she's carpetbagging the Wyoming seat. So if she wants to do that then why not knock off a Senator who deserves it more than Enzi. And if that includes coming here and taking a crack at Johanns then more power to her. Enzi has him beat, too.
There is much to like in this article. Mike Enzi may be dulitous but he voted to save the party from Amnesty and Durbin and Schumer. He was with it when it was needed. Could we count on Dick Cheneys daughter doing the same? So I agree with you.
Now who was it who said ... Peace through Strength ...?
Really?
Good grief, did you do too much LSD or crack when you were young?
Really?
How does someone post that kind of sentence with a straight face?
Really?
Liberaltarian ... drunk on the LRon koolaid ...
Sure it is.
It's 0bama who has gone where no other president has or would, and only to support the MB. Cheney would not be doing this.
Occasionally he gets things right, but believing the guy on most things just makes you stupid.
I can't believe the dude said that.
“I don’t think it’s been well handled,” Cheney said. “I will be the first to admit it’s a complex, difficult situation. I frankly think John McCain has it just about right. John and I don’t always agree on everything. We have had our debates over the years but I think John has pretty well nailed it. Now we are to the point where it’s hard to understand that it’s the use of chemical weapons that triggered this result. As John said the other day, well, there were 93,000 people killed not affected by chemical weapons. Where was the concern then? It’s not clear to me what the mission is here, or they understand the mission.”
Sounds to me like Cheney is with McCain in wanting to use the US military to help the Muslim Brotherhood's friends in Syria.
A move back towards traditional American conservative isolation is twenty years overdue. The New World Order is not a concept George Washington would approve.
Her feeling about illegal immigration is that we need a sane policy to stop illegal immigration. One that finally closes our borders, enforces the laws already on our books, and restores the rule of law.
In short she is a conservative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.