Posted on 07/08/2013 9:04:48 AM PDT by mandaladon
SANFORD, Fla. A series of witnesses testified Monday morning that George Zimmerman was the voice screaming in the background during a crucial 911 recording that contained the sound of the gunshot that killed Trayvon Martin.
Yes, definitely, its Georgie I hear him screaming, testified Sondra Osterman, one of several witnesses called by the defense on Monday. Osterman worked with Zimmerman at a mortgage firm and said she was best friends with Zimmermans wife. State prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda focused on a non-emergency phone call recording in which Zimmerman said these f****** punks, they always get away, playing it four times during Ostermans testimony.
Osterman identified Zimmermans voice in that recording but said she didnt believe he sounded angry. Zimmermans anger leading up to the shooting is a key component of the second-degree murder charge against him. In Florida, second-degree murder requires ill-will, hatred, and spite.
Ostermans husband, Mark, said that the voice just sounded like George. He noted that he spoke on the phone to Zimmerman as often as he spoke to him in person. Mark Osterman testified last week as a state witness.
Mark Osterman also taught Zimmerman how to shoot firearms. Asked if he thought hed taught Zimmerman how to shoot properly, Osterman said I hope so.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Scott should be out front, as he is the coward who appointed Angela Corey.
The vast Majority will understand, it is the small minority that will use
it as an excuse to loot and steal.
Why $ould $aint Tray’$ mom want to lie$
That's been my prediction all along. The prosecution did such a terrible job, nobody's even going to be able to muster up phoney outrage at the inevitable acquittal.
The "riots" will amount to a few broken windows and disturbing the peace arrests.
The shaptonistas will just move on to the next case, having learned the lesson that they need to be sure the next guy they railroad is definitely all-the-way white. This whole case was fuzzy as a white hispanic.
The mother always says the son is innocent.
There’s plenty of cowardice to go around in this one.
That’s pretty much all Hollywood nonsense. If you have extremely clear audio sources that have not gone through “lossy” compression (cell phones, etc.) then you might be able to scientifically point to two sets of wave data “correlating” (preferably two audio sources saying the same thing, same tone, etc.). This is actually something people do much better than computers.
Most of the time you only have audio that is “altered” due to the microphone and transmission systems (audio compression), if you then add background noise or reduced amplitude (faint audio) it becomes impossible to determine this scientifically.
” I wonder how many people are going to be disappointed if there aren’t any riots...?”
Well the “two reverends” will sure to be, along with the “racebaters” on the MSM networks. Look for Obama to stoke the fires of racism if Z is acquitted. He needs a distraction right now and race riots are just the ticket.
Guarantee that Barry ‘No limits Prezzy’ Obama will use the upcoming not guilty verdict as his moment in the sun. He will hit the airwaves right away, being dismissive of the jury’s decision, claiming that we still have a long way to go in race relations, blah blah blah, tragedy of losing a young man’s life, blah blah blah, and then call for (wink wink to Al and Jesse) peaceful time of reflection over the outcome of this case...
Once a community organizer, always a community organizer!
Can’t they do a voice analysis to determine whose voice it is? Do they have Trayvon’s voice on record after he was shot?
Yes, you should.
The experts have said no, there’s no voice analysis that can give an accurate result, and the best way of telling is asking people who know the individuals personally, preferably if they have heard their voices under similar circumstances.
The most advanced technology available is the technology God made.
I doubt Standing Wolf will take a scenic drive to the minority part
of town in which he lives on the day Z is aquited to test his no riot theory.
Thanks for clear explanation of voice prints. Clearly, I’m no techie.
“I havent followed the trial. That said, a sound recording can be analyzed for voice prints, I believe. So why doesnt the defense team have that done? Is a voice print admissible?”
“Voice prints” don’t work on screams, as a whole slew of pre-trial experts testified.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.