Posted on 07/06/2013 12:02:24 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
Currently just Tweets and locals talking about this, nothing on news sites yet. Lots of stuff in the Twitter feed, including links to uploaded videos of the smoking mess.
Some of the injured are said to have severe road rash as if they skid on pavement. And one of the girls killed was found on the runway and the other a mile(?) away. So it appears passengers were being ejected from the plane as it skid down the run away.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-plane-crash-hospitals-20130707,0,3410271.story
The pilots may have been confused about their speed.
“The target speed for the approach of Asiana Flight 214 was 137 knots, and the crew can be heard on the cockpit voice recorder acknowledging the speed, Hersman said.”
“But the speed was significantly below 137 knots, and “we are not talking about a few knots,” she said.”
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/07/us/plane-crash-main/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Will the cause of this air speed differential ( readout via pilot HUD, against actual physical speed) be defined in this:
http://www.davi.ws/avionics/TheAvionicsHandbook_Cap_11.pdf
Did the pilots know this 777 aircraft speed was well below the requirement for a landing, perhaps I have the facts wrong?!
QUOTE
A failure which results in some particular component remaining active, but the functionality it provides is in error. An example of this failure would be a Low Range Radio Altimeter whose output is indicating the airplane is at an altitude 500 ft above the ground when the airplane is actually 200 ft above the ground.
Fire Truck May Have Run Over Asiana Plane Crash Victim
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Fire-Truck-May-Have-Run-Over-Asiana-Plane-Crash-Victim-214546021.html?_osource=SocialFlowFB_BAYBrand
How horrible.
Bit of a career misjudgment, that. Oopsie!
Interesting that this was a veteran pilot but was considered to be in-training for the for the 777. This was his first time landing a 777 at SFO. There was an experienced 777 pilot with him.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-usa-crash-asiana-20130706,0,54068.story
Maybe a confluence of things contributed to the crash.
“Fuel slushy” problem was with Rolls Royce engines, not Pratt and Whitney engines. This plane had PW engines.
After seeing a picture of the approach end of the runway, maybe he was trying a little too hard to touch down on the numbers...??
Two hotshots went VFR in an an amateurish attempt to touch down on the runway threshold. If the aircraft's equipment is found faultless, these two cowboys should be stripped of their airman's certificates and criminally prosecuted, followed by a civil suit to recover all the assets they possess.
If that’s the case, they weren’t very good at it. The rock wall they whacked was 600 feet before the threshold according to other comments.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-officials-passengers-described-chaos-after-crash-20130706,0,7930406.story
A “BFO @ SFO”? Big F¥|<|n@ Oopsie?
Nah...touchdown zone’s about 500 feet past the threshold.
L. A. Times amended the article -— now it says (near the end):
“...officials later said, TSA conducted standard security checks in an expedited line, but the additional screenings were conducted by United Airlines workers and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents.”
LOL, I like it!
You dream on as well. I’ve had to clean up similar mistakes from men. I don’t know what your problem with women is, but I hope you get over it at some point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.