Posted on 07/06/2013 1:48:17 AM PDT by Olog-hai
“What’s the American interest to support the Muslim Brotherhood?” I asked. “Look,” explained one distinguished, older gentleman. "The West says one thing and does another. The Americans and Europeans speak so highly for democracy, freedom and human rights, but in the Middle East they support the most autocratic regimes, which object to all these principles. The Americans have three main interests in the area: Defending Israel, the oil in the Persian Gulf and control over the Suez Canal. They’ll do everything to maintain these interests, and therefore are in favor of the status quo. Mubarak guaranteed Israel’s security. Morsi did nothing against Israel. Instead, he let Palestinians move from the Gaza Strip to Sinai. So, we deposed him.” …
Another man at the café shows me the newspaper he is reading: “Here is the proof that the Americans and Israelis are behind the Muslim Brotherhood,” he said pointing to a headline that read “Israel regrets Morsi’s ouster,” and underneath, in small letters, the analysis is attributed to an op-ed published in the Haaretz paper, explaining why Morsi is “good for Israel.”
The article was quoted in nearly all of Egypt’s paper’s Friday as proof of Israel antagonistic position in regards to Egypt and its secret pact with Morsi and the Brotherhood in a bid to dominate the area. …
(Excerpt) Read more at ynetnews.com ...
0bamaCAIR.
Right answer, wrong reasons. the IMF wants to deploy $4.8 billion in Egypt and USA 1.5 billion for military. Morsi was not in agreement with conditions of austerity or was stealing too much or both. Now he is gone (but its not a military coup). Follow the $.
The daily paper El Dostor, which is closely affiliated with the liberal opposition Wafd party, has conducted a fierce battle against the Muslim Brotherhood’s regime. It took its battle one step further and its headline read: “Egypt has crushed the Zionist, American and Muslim Brotherhood's lobby with the ouster of Morsi.”Incidentally, Ynet makes a fatal mistake calling Hizbalwafd (Wafd party) “liberal”—they are anything but. They are strongly National Socialist and also Holocaust deniers.
According the lively imagination of the paper's editors, the three groups were in cahoots in a bid to bring about a division in Egypt, allow radicals to take over Sinai and use such a situation to justify an Israeli reoccupation of the peninsula, where an alternative Palestinian homeland would be formed. …
Right answer?
Read some of the Wafd Party propaganda. It’s as far from reality as one can get.
Well it might help if we drive Grover Norquist from Washington.
Let’s see, the British were being propped up by the Zionists in 1917.
King Farouk was a puppert of the Zionists.
Nasser, after ‘67 was a tool of the Zionists.
Sadat after the Yom Kippur War (they call it the Ramadan War)was a Zionist because he made peace with Begin.
Mubarak was in cahoots with the Zionists so, he had to go.
Morsi the extreme anti-semite, is controlled by the Zionists.
Who’s next? Wow, those Zionists really control their enemies, eh?
Funny, ususally at this time of the year when it is very hot in the Arab world and they “celebrate” Ramadan they go even more insane than they already are. Maybe we should ban Ramadan?
The difference between the two semitic groups is put two Jews together and you’ll get four solutions put two of their cousins together and you’ll get six different conspiracies.
Not just the Middle East -- didn't 51.1% vote for the Autocratic Regime here last November?
No big surprise that the Muslim Brotherhood was supported by our big-eared Muslim bro.
A country needs to have a civil society to foster and cultivate democracy. Most countries in the ME are far from civil. They need dictators. I’m not saying they need to put people through wood chippers, but giving Egypt, Iraq, Iran and the others democracy is like giving a monkey a typewriter. They’re gonna bang on it then take a dump on it.
51.1 percent cannot include the dead, I think.
This is just another example of “my enemies enemy is my friend” policy went wrong. The US made this kind of mistake in foreign policies way too often in the last 50 years.
a) Supporting the sha of Persia (a dictator) to threaten the USSR. Result: The Islamic Revolution in Iran, iran was now joining russia against the US.
b) Supporting Saddam Hussein cause he was at war with the Islamic Morons of Iran. Result: Saddam thought he could do what ever he wants to with the support of the US, even against other US allies (Kuwait)
c) Supporting the islamic Mujahideen in Afghanistan against the USSR. One of the most important Persons the US gov supported: OBL, you know how that story turned out on 9/11 ...
The last POTUS who knew how to deal on the international stage was Eisenhower. All the other morons that followed him made the mistake to think military power supersedes morals and values. With military power you might win a war, but without morals and values you will loose peace.
If the US government would simply quit meddling into other nation’s affairs, the US might regain some international friends. But, this wishful thinking shall never happen again; the CIA has a purpose far beyond US security matters.
Time is a factor. Morsi did not hurry to end the agreements and commence anti Israel action. He was thus in collusion with Israel and the USA. He was not stupid.
Would he have eventually attempted to destroy Israel? Can’t say but the pressure would be increasingly strong to do so.
This isn’t such a surprise, Obama’s advocacy of the MB was all over those convenient English-language signs the spontaneous crowds of millions carried all over for the photo-ops.
Thanks Olog-hai.
Muslim Brotherhood site says Egypt’s new president is secretly Jewish [LOL!]
Washington Post | 7/5/13 | Max Fisher
Posted on 07/05/2013 8:49:59 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3039425/posts
‘Arab Spring is not over yet’: Israel watches Egypt warily
nbcnews.com | July 04, 2013 | Paul Goldman
Posted on 07/04/2013 1:00:44 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3039175/posts
False conclusions. Just because Morsi wasn’t moving as fast as the Egyptians wanted to go to war with Israel does not mean he was in collusion with both Israel and the USA—that is like concluding that Hitler was in collusion with the British and USA because he took X amount of years to invade Poland.
And this particular perception proves just how radical the majority of the Egyptian public is.
There are Soviets nowadays?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.